Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titan Sports Plus

Titan Sports Plus

Titan Sports Plus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This may be notable, but if it is, there's absolutely nothing in the English language to indicate that this is the case. TimothyJosephWood 17:06, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:16, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:16, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:16, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

• Delete its spam Legacypac (talk) 18:18, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
• Redirect to Titan Sports (newspaper) as a plausible redirect; a whole lot of words to tell us 'this is the paper's mobile app'. Nate • (chatter) 20:08, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

User:Mrschimpf, that is one of a half dozen other articles of dubious notability created by this apparent COI SPA. TimothyJosephWood 00:29, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for flagging me to the SPA issues; looking at that article closer, I would have to switch to a delete based on that. Nate • (chatter) 01:21, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

• Delete I've been trying to combat this spam article for a while now. Had the original deleted before. Nothing has changed since then.★Trekker (talk) 01:24, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 30 May 2017 (UTC)