User talk:Quinton Feldberg

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Bryan Fuller

I have recently been restoring what I firmly believe to be wrongful deletions to the article; such as: the seemingly blatant removal of all mentioning of Star Trek: Discovery based solely on the fact that he had to leave due to other commitments. He is still forever credited as co-creator, exec producer, and writer; no reason for removal; period. Also, my deletions of multiple article links in the awards and nominations section seems to be an issue; although I can't see why that is a problem; common sense would indicate that we don't need multiple links to same article in one section, no? I truly apologize if I have enraged you for any reason, but I can't understand why this is such a problem. I have reached out to you using my actual account, so before you revert again, please message me to discuss this. If nothing else: keep ST: D in; please. - Cartoon Boy (talk) 04:10, 31 April 2017 (UTC)

Undid edits

Any particular reason why you undid my edits? Should you and user:Cyberpower678 be reported for vandalism? 37.157.106.116 (talk) 17:12, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Edits like this one are not constructive. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:19, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

From Aononvfnakw

please see the reasoning for my edit to the lgbt rights page here is what I wrote

(please don't add the table back in without an explanation (a key for the table explaining what it means) ---- need a key to explain how this table of checks and X's work (check vs check/X vs X/check vs X meaning)) 

The table doesn't currently make any sense and I've left notes on the talk page, etc and no one has explained it the table should not be included on the page without a key — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aononvfnakw (talk • contribs) 20:32, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

النظام الاجتماعي

Hi, you recently tagged the page النظام الاجتماعي for deletion with the A2 tag, but didn't specify which page it was a duplicate of. So could you add in which page in a foreign WP it is a duplicate of? Thanks  Seagull123  Φ  21:21, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Actually, it is almost an exact copy of social system just translated to Arabic. Maybe he meant to create this in the Arabic wiki since they don't have a social system article over there. Adamtt9 (talk) 21:32, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Copying over. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:33, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Actually, they already have an article. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:38, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

hispid hare changes

I have recently made some changes to the hispid hare page that is true and can be proven by the Natural History Museum in London. please could you add the information back, and if you do not believe me, you can contact the Natural History Museum to prove that the information is correct, and then add it.

thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freddien03 (talk • contribs) 21:22, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

I reverted you because you inserted comments into the article, not because of your correction. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:40, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

well can I put the correction into the article if it is the comment you removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freddien03 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead! Please do! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:44, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Nope! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:42, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Please check these edits : this new user changed unit of measurement from mm to km, and g to kg for body size, thus making the hispid hare a monster. And now s/he even claims you permitted him to do so on my talk page! -- BhagyaMani (talk) 23:37, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, my mistake! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:39, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

NBA Playgrounds

I am fixing the vandalization done to the Wikipedia page by some individuals that insist on censoring vital information. The game requires a constant internet connection even for offline and local play. Victims would buy this game and lose $20 as this information is actively being hidden and now these vandals are aiding the developer in censorship. Please help make Wikipedia a proper place for important information and stop helping vandals & censors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.26.72.4 (talk) 11:14, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

RE: Richard Cheese

Sorry, I was making a swipe at the fact I added a link to what Richard Cheese's name was a pun off of, which was possibly overly anal. 2602:30A:2E7F:2170:9509:E23F:8C98:E497 (talk) 17:51, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Something serious

This is Gibberish eaters. I noticed you had given me a warning about vandalism for The Lorax. I just want to say, why is this wrong. I mean, I can't be blocked for putting true information, right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gibberish eaters (talk • contribs) 18:01, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Ahem?

How was that vandalism that I did on the Jeopardy page? And you still didn't answer my question about The Lorax. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gibberish eaters (talk • contribs) 18:04, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Regarding reversion of Emotion

Good day, Feldberg. I came to my attension that my previous contribution regarding Wikipedia:Peer review/Emotion (Carly Rae Jepsen album)/archive1 has been reversed because "it did not appear constructive". May you kindly explain why the edit was not constructive please. User DIPLOMAT'S SON wanted his editing of Emotion to be reviewed, stating that he needed help with neutrality. I gave my advice regarding why the article is class B and not class GA and what changes need to be made, eg phrasing and word choices. Been new to Wikipedia, I am confused as to why my advice was unconstructive. May you kindly explain your reversion please? Thank you very much -张雨涵 (talk) 18:17, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

A pie

Why am I giving out a pie? --- Just 张雨涵 (talk) 18:18, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

AIV reports

Hi Quinton Feldberg,

You appear to have made a large number of AIV reports recently via Huggle that either aren't vandalism or are being reported after a Level 4IM warning when its not appropriate to do so. Can you double check to ensure that when using Huggle level appropriate warnings are issued before reporting someone to AIV so as to keep the backlog of reports to a minimum. If you need guidance on advice on the specifics of using Huggle there are plenty of operators of it who would be willing to help.

Amortias (T)(C) 20:39, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Ok, you don't appear to have read the above notification so please:

* Desist from issuing 4IM warnings for low level vandalism

• Respond to peoples queries about why you have reverted their edits when they ask for more information otherwise its likely to just continue
• Stop reporting IP's to AIV after a single bad edit.

If not its likely someone will pull the rollback right and prevent you from being able to use Huggle at all.

Amortias (T)(C) 21:05, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

This editor was never given a 4im warning and I do not recall issuing any 4im warnings today, nor can I find any in my contributions history. Can you provide diffs for any 4im warnings I may have issued? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:17, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Ok, have re-reviewed and the 4IM warnings look like they were issued by others prior to you reporting them to AIV, there are declined AIV reports because of this and several unanswered questions above (and below) that need responding to. Anti-vandalism work is not just about reverting vandalism (though most of it is) but explaining to those who you reverted why it was done when asked to explain it as the templates are about as useful as a chocolate teapot when advising people exactly what's wrong. If someone's questioning why you reverted them in a calm and appropriate manner its less likely its vandalism and more likely that its lack of knowledge of the editing policies and more can be gained from discussing this with the users in question. The fact taht youve started replying does allay some of the concern I had earlier but it would be beneficial to respond to the other queries on your talk page about reverts you've actioned. Amortias (T)(C) 21:40, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Ok. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:44, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

I'm done

Alright Quinton, this is it. You haven't been responding. I don't see why my edits and only MY edits are vandalism. I think it's because you hate me. And only ME. So please give me a reason that was vandalism (please check your talk page) or else I will have you BLOCKED. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gibberish eaters (talk • contribs) 20:40, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

I don't hate you. Can you explain why this edit isn't vandalism? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:28, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Yes, Quinton, I did admit on my talk page that the Alvin edit and the Harvey Beaks edit were vandalism. I was asking about the Lorax and Jeopardy. --Gibberish eaters (talk) 18:01, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

 Restored Quinton Feldberg (talk) 18:09, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

GTA gang

Please, read the news from Russia first: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/01/world/europe/russia-moscow-gta-gang-dead.html before accusing me wrongly in vandalism of GTA gang article! If you will not stop, your action will be reported to the admins! KOT-TOK (talk) 00:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

 Edit restored! Warnings removed. Thank you for contacting me! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 00:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Mandela effect

I don't think my edits were that helpful to the larger article on collective false memory, but they were helpful to the smaller topic that redirects there on the Mandela Effect. If you are going to redirect it there, then that section, which is currently only 2 paragraphs, should include an explanation of why many people believe the origin of the effect is George W. Bush. Bush made many inaccurate statements over the years, but here we have a collective false memory of Bush having a false memory that people falsely remember having given rise to a popular name for collective false memories. That seems pretty helpful at least to the collective false memory portion of the larger article. If you want to take out the part about Bush Sr. and the funeral, well, that I have no problem with. Those are just interesting tidbits that are not really important to the point. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18F:902:8D90:94E4:43E3:5391:60C5 (talk) 16:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

 Restored! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 16:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

From ThatOhioGuy

Hey, Quinton Feldberg thanks for welcoming me to the wiki community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThatOhioGuy (talk • contribs) 17:44, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

How did you even find me on wiki anyway? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThatOhioGuy (talk • contribs) 17:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Hey I just created a wiki go to the American Arena League wiki the click on the Rochester Kings I think it worked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThatOhioGuy (talk • contribs) 19:20, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Cool Quinton Feldberg (talk) 19:21, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Hey Just another question what type of wikis do you edit. and I also wanted to know if you wanted to help me create a wiki.

Wiki:the Central Penn Chargers or Savannah Coastal Outlaws — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThatOhioGuy (talk • contribs) 18:58, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Sure! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:38, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

we need to build a wall

               _ _ 
              | | |
__      ____ _| | |
\ \ /\ / / _` | | |
 \ V  V / (_| | | |
  \_/\_/ \__,_|_|_|

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.178.100.135 (talk) 20:01, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

From Hieucd97

No worries, mistakes happen to everyone. Have a good one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hieucd97 (talk • contribs) 08:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

From Wikieditor3567

Hello Quinton,

I am a representative from Lorraine Schwartz who just updated the necessary information with SOURCING. I do not understand why the current information that I have provided reasoning for it being out of dater and inaccurate is constantly being change back even after I have updated it to the proper information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikieditor3567 (talk • contribs) 16:05, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Block on MacTheSlayer

Hi, Quinton Feldberg. I see you recently blocked a user called MacTheSlayer. It appears they are still making a lot of unsouced edits to political pages and they seem to be changing sourced material to represent other ideologies / claims that the citations do not support (as seen on their 'user contributions' page). Not sure if they have got past the block, or maybe a new one should be issued, as they seem to be doing similar stuff to what got them blocked in the first place. Helper201 (talk) 22:49, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

I'm not an admin. I don't block people. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 22:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Oh right, apologies. Helper201 (talk) 22:53, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome!

Thanks for the welcome you left on my talk page. I signed-up in 2005 and so it has been ~13 years before my first welcome message! :) Davidljung (talk) 01:20, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Wow! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 01:21, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

new

thanks for the welcome108.75.79.57 (talk) 07:30, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Hi QF... thank you for the welcome message.... Cheers! Manuone (talk) 17:10, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

AIV reports and inappropriate use of rollback

Hi Quinton. You recently reported 188.29.164.172 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) at AIV for vandalism. When I looked at the anonymous user's edits from today, it was absolutely clear to me that they were not vandalism. This is another instance in a recent pattern of you reverting good faith edits and reporting editors to AIV that are not vandalizing (see Special:Permalink/793603954). In addition, you used Huggle and rollback to revert these good faith edits without an edit summary and have done this several times recently.

I ask that first, you pay more attention when on vandalism patrol. Reverting good faith edits, warning users who did not vandalize, and reporting users to AIV who are not vandals drives people away from Wikipedia and wastes time of administrators. Second, you must not use Huggle and rollback to revert good faith edits. If you continue to misuse rollback, your rollback right will be revoked. I will note that on other occasions you have been doing a good job at fighting vandalism—the main issue is you need to be more conscientious when editing. Thank you, Malinaccier (talk) 21:17, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

This IP was blocked 2 weeks by @Widr: for block evasion. The edit you restored was valid, though. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:28, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks—chatting with Widr. Malinaccier (talk) 21:36, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Any other erroneous AIV reports today? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:39, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Looks like Materialscientist declined your report of User:Hollywoodream, but otherwise looks good. Malinaccier (talk) 21:48, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Yes, Malinaccier, I agree with you so much. Quinton Feldberg is, to me, the rudest wikipedia user on here. Quinton Feldberg always says I'm vandalising pages, and when I ask why, Quinton doesn't even respond. I even threatened Quinton I would get an administrator, a role model like you, Malinaccier, to block Quinton, but Quinton still doesn't respond. --Gibberish eaters (talk) 00:17, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Not true. I responded. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 00:19, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

There won't be a block here (not by a long shot), but a little more care will go a long way :). Malinaccier (talk) 00:35, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Ok. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 00:36, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Yes, but, Quinton, you still did not answer about how I vandalised the pages on The Lorax and Jeopardy. Why, you think you rule the world! No you don't. How did I vandalise the pages? I did admit on Alvin and the Chipmunks and Harvey Beaks. --Gibberish eaters (talk) 13:25, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Gabby

It's not even worth it to warn her on whatever account/IP she's using. She knows full well what's going on and and this point we should just WP:DENY her attention. Thanks for your help reverting. Home Lander (talk) 22:49, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Gender?

By the way, Quinton, are you a boy or a girl? I don't want to offend you, but I'm kinda getting tired of calling you Quinton instead of he or she. But I don't want to assume genders. Also, what's your race and skin color? No offense! --Gibberish eaters (talk) 13:28, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Changing wiki page name

Hi Quinton Feldberg! Thanks for your message.

In creating the living personalities page for "Ko Sesha", a tamil language writer from India, I missed to add the "_" in the link (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KoSesha), hence the page title is displayed as "KoSesha" as against "Ko Sesha". I created an alternate wiki page, this time with the correct page name (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ko_Sesha).

How do I now delete the originally create page?

Need your advice, thanks! Meghasridhar (talk) 08:33, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome message

I've been editing from time to time for a long time, and registered back in 2012 - but I appreciate the first welcome message a lot! Take care, Dominik — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberdom-pl (talk • contribs) 11:56, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

And the exact opposite for me lol. I do not need a welcome message every time my ip changes. While i do not want to complain but... well maybe i do want to complain a little haha, i apreciate the notion, it is just a bit pointless. Can't ever please everyone obviously, so... whatever. Like the "endured days" userbox by the way. Let us hope that number does not grow too high lol. Carry on anway, but thought it humerous, feeling a little annoyed by the welcome to see someone apreciate it. So, cheers for the two slight chuckles. Have a good day anyway. 91.49.70.65 (talk) 13:35, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you

Good to be here! Looking forward to becoming an admin and eventually bureaucrat someday. Think I might start making some bots after I get rollback privileges. --PotentialPotential (talk) 13:37, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the invitation.

85.193.218.178 (talk) 16:05, 8 August 2017 (UTC)