Jump to content

Talk:The Fifth Element: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.6beta3) (FA RotBot)
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:The Fifth Element/Archive 1) (bot
Line 36: Line 36:
}}
}}
{{archives|auto=long|search=yes|bot=MiszaBot I|age=100|units=days}}
{{archives|auto=long|search=yes|bot=MiszaBot I|age=100|units=days}}

== Awards ==

This website provides a comprehensive list of every award this film was nominated for [http://www.movie-collection.com/movie/the-fifth-element/awards]. I'm not sure if it meets [[WP:RS]], but if for nothing else i've found it very handy as a way of knowing what awards to search for better references for. [[User:Freikorp|Freikorp]] ([[User talk:Freikorp|talk]]) 06:27, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
:I've since used the above reference, along with the reference mentioned below that is used to back up that the film won a Bogey award, an inline citations that the film was nominated for an additional 4 Cesar awards (the article had good references for the 3 Cesar awards it won, just no other references for the other 4 nominations). If both of these sources are deemed to be unreliable I will simply remove both of them and the mentions that the film received the additional 4 Cesar nominations. [[User:Freikorp|Freikorp]] ([[User talk:Freikorp|talk]]) 01:07, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
:The Cesar Awards now list all their previous nomination and winners on their official website - so i've ditched the old, questionable reference and cited their official website instead. [[User:Freikorp|Freikorp]] ([[User talk:Freikorp|talk]]) 10:26, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

This reliable reference states the film won a [[Lumière Award]]: [http://movies.msn.com/movies/movie-awards-and-nominations/the-fifth-element/?ipp=15], I'm just in the process or determining whether this award itself meets notability guidelines. [[User:Freikorp|Freikorp]] ([[User talk:Freikorp|talk]]) 02:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
:I'm almost certain the Lumière Award and the [[Prix Lumière]] are in fact, the same award, and until I am told otherwise I am linking the award in the article to Prix Lumière. [[User:Freikorp|Freikorp]] ([[User talk:Freikorp|talk]]) 01:55, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
:They were the same award. Someone else has merged the articles. [[User:Freikorp|Freikorp]] ([[User talk:Freikorp|talk]]) 10:22, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Awards this film supposedly was nominated for or won currently not mentioned in the article:
*Nominated for the [[Italian National Syndicate of Film Journalists]] Silver Ribbon award for Best Foreign Director (according to IMDb [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119116/awards?ref_=tt_awd])
*<strike>Nominated for the [[Blockbuster Entertainment Award]] for Favorite Female Newcomer (Milla Jovovich)</strike> Found reference.
*It won the [[Bogey Award]] in Silver - According to IMDb and these not so reliable sources [http://cinedat.org/filme/das_fuenfte_element][http://okino.ru/film/awards/8062][http://www.eofftv.com/c/cin/cinquieme_element%20_main.htm]. [[User:Freikorp|Freikorp]] ([[User talk:Freikorp|talk]]) 01:55, 19 May 2013 (UTC) The award itself is also of debated notability.
*The film received 12 nominations at the 1997 [[Online Film & Television Association]] awards, 2 of which it won. [http://ofta.oscarguy.com/Awards/Film/1997.html]. Once again, the award itself is not tremendously notable. [[User:Freikorp|Freikorp]] ([[User talk:Freikorp|talk]]) 10:22, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

== Themes (Gender) ==

I gather from this section that this film is bad and stuff, because it "erases" women and reinforces gender stereotypes, through the nefarious means of ''featuring men and women in various roles, some of whom are competent or interesting, and some who are not''. Sheesh. These opinions are referenced, but are they notable? Because if not, then this section is devoting a lot of text to saying stuff that is not only absurd (in my opinion), but fringe. [[User:Wardog|Iapetus]] ([[User talk:Wardog|talk]]) 12:49, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

:I had trouble finding information on themes for this film; this is pretty much all I could come up with. That being said, I don't think there's anything wrong with the gender comments. It's only one paragraph and it contains two sources; one from a notable feminist journal and one from a notable academic publisher. Perhaps the feminist journal could be considered fringe, but I don't think they are given undue weight, and they make observations similar to a book from a mainstream academic publisher. I don't think the take home message from this film paragraph is that it's 'bad', I just accept that it plays into some gender stereotypes. Knowing that doesn't make me enjoy the film any less. If anyone else can find reliable sources on other themes in the film I would be more than happy to write new paragraphs based on the sources myself, so that the gender paragraph has less prominence in the themes section. I would like to hear more opinions on this though. [[User:Freikorp|Freikorp]] ([[User talk:Freikorp|talk]]) 13:10, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

::I agree that the critique is unfair and invalid, but if there aren't any other scholarly analyses, what are you gonna do? [[User:Brutannica|Brutannica]] ([[User talk:Brutannica|talk]]) 15:19, 2 April 2015 (UTC)


== Image: ==
== Image: ==

Revision as of 01:22, 28 October 2017

Featured articleThe Fifth Element is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 22, 2013Good article nomineeListed
September 5, 2014Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 28, 2014Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Image:

Is there a better image to use in the intro? The current poster is a floating head poster, which is kind of bland looking. --Harizotoh9 (talk) 19:03, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Now a FA in Chinese Wikipedia

I have translated this article to Chinese Wikipedia here and promoted to FA status, and I want to thank User:Freikorp for his effort to write this amazing article. --Jarodalien (talk) 16:11, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on The Fifth Element. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:47, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Fifth Element. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:58, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]