User talk:Omicronpersei8

This is a Wikipedia user talk page. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Omicronpersei8.

Wikimedia Foundation

This is the User talk page for Omicronpersei8

Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page by starting a new thread. If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia and frequently asked questions.

Talk page guidelines Please respect Wikiquette, assume good faith and be nice, and bear in mind what Wikipedia is not.

If you received a vandalism warning from me and don't know why, you are probably browsing with an IP address used by many different people. You should not be concerned, as the warning was probably not meant for you. If you are blocked and feel you should not be, you are welcome to put {{unblock|Reason why you should be unblocked}} on your talk page. Thank you. Further reading: Wikipedia:Advice to AOL users, Wikipedia:Blocking policy, Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies

Archives index
May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 (175 KB) August 2006 (244 KB) September 2006 (126 KB) October 2006 (135 KB) November 2006 (82 KB)

October 2006

Fair deal.

I had no idea. Fair deal. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.116.19.211 (talk • contribs) 05:38, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Remark

Thank you for your work on reverting of vandalism. It is, as I know myself, easy to get carried away when doing it. Please note that your edit summary here [1] might be construed as not being in the spirit of WP:BITE. Hornplease 08:22, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, you're probably right. Sorry. The person in question had added that twice before and was persisting, which began to get frustrating. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:24, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

I'll keep an eye out. A lot of new users in India first discover WP when looking for their local politicians, so there's a lot of that sort of thing happening at first. Thanks for all your work! Hornplease 08:25, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

There also seems to be a sizable bit of vanity entries coming from India as well, although this is just a personal observation/opinion, so that probably also fueled the frustrated edit summary mentioned above. Thanks for your kind comments; I'll try to tone it down. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:27, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

User:Popeye Doyle

Thank you for the welcome.Popeye Doyle 10:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Hello

Right... More questions! (Since you are the only person yet to help, you are the target of my annoyance for this short period of time till I find someone else as patient.) How do you get a new page to pop up (ie: "Talk" or "Archives"...)? Da.Tomato.Dude 01:15, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Reg: Popping Up

By popping up i meant like having new websites/pages connected to the original. --*SMILYS FOR ALL!* 02:53, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Hello

THANKS! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 4.18GB (talk • contribs) 03:09, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting my user page. (Sorry about this edit btw - I didn't read it properly!) --Casper2k3 03:26, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

No problem, it happens. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:26, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Get This

Thanks for picking up vandalism on Get This - keep up the good work :) --Mikecraig 02:06, 13 October 2006 (UTC) (p.s - I feel sorry for all the stupid people out there who are vanadalising your wiki's)

Ed Kavalee

And also good work on keeping an eye on this wiki also...I am always trying to keep it clean --Mikecraig 02:32, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Flavor Flav

I just figured I'd let you know that I'm on the situation. I've blocked the blanking, goatsing IP. Such conduct will not be tolerated, and thanks for reporting. I've placed a stern warning on the page (I called their behavior "idiotic") and it has been watchlisted. The issue stems from whether they can include their CS clan (called Flava Flav) in the article. Alphachimp 03:21, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

They're going great. Oh yeah, I've decided to start corresponding normally (like you do) on talk pages. It just seemed quite a bit more logical. Have you given any thought to the offer from before? Alphachimp 03:24, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Looks like you caught me in one of those rare times where I don't do that! Good to hear the first thing, hope you're not being overwhelmed or anything. And about the offer, I'm not sure if I would have the time lately, and I don't really have the desire for a few different reasons. But I certainly appreciate it. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:28, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Haha. I'll just keep making it every month or so. Someday you'll just be bored or something and you'll take it (you can add it to your resume...). Alphachimp 03:49, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

About your reverted edit about Maurice Clarett

he is a dumb criminal and i think he should have a negative wikipedia page about him. Dont you agree —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.18.171.127 (talk • contribs) 05:08, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

WikiCookie

WikiCookie

Seeing that you have been working tirelessly on various wiki's relating to Triple M radio shows/personality - I thought you deserve a WikiCookie snack! --Mikecraig 05:31, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

How do i Copyrate my photo?

HEllo, you deleted the photo of marius moga that i'm the photgrapher of. I own the pic. How do i proove that, i didn't understand much from the step by step how to copyright a picture. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.210.127.209 (talk • contribs) 13:47, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

... for watching my back last night; that was one of the most unpleasant and illogical bunches of trolls in recent memory. Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 15:26, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

EXCUSE ME

excuse me, are you racist? then stop reverting my correction of Borat's encyclopedic defination please —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.47.145.79 (talk • contribs) 20:09, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, clearly this person is a racist! --24.77.216.252 20:52, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

I did not vandalize the Mars page

Clearly you're crazy. My sentence was sourced and everything! Yes, you are quite obviously a fool if you do not think Men Live on Mars while Women live on Venus. Where have you been, dude?? --24.77.216.252 20:55, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Please

I am reverting vandalims on User:Illythr, back to the version written by User:Illythr himself. Please understand this, you aspiring admin, and look into things carefully before passing judgement. Blurb sock 21:20, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Blurb sock (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is Khoikhoi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) --125.248.244.131 21:21, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

CheckUser please

Blurb sock (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is Khoikhoi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)-please post a checkUser request in order to find the right vandal...--125.248.244.131 21:21, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism

http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Economy_of_Romania&diff=81284730&oldid=81283467 don't you think?Blurb sock (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is Khoikhoi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)-125.248.244.131 21:24, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Please stop preventing Blurb Sock from reverting vandalism on my user page. Chisinau hasn't been part of Romania since WWII. --Illythr 21:30, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Just to clarify this, the anon 125.248.244.131 is an obvious sock of permabanned User:Bonaparte, who has been on a private vendetta against User:Khoikhoi for a while and is now desperately trying to attack his RFA. Scabbers the Rat 21:34, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Hey, Thanks

For the double revert of my userpage. A couple angry annon vandals (obvious from the diffs). Keep it up! -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk) 22:51, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

apologies

I was trying to rvv the other vandalism on Reagan, and accidentally reverted back to the wrong version. Gotyear 01:58, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

No problem, I'm sure that's one very minor whoops out of many great RC edits. Thanks for helping out. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 01:59, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

My first whoops. I pressed Edit this page before I even saw the page, which must've been the wrong page. Gotyear 02:02, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

may 16 page

I am attempting to learn about wiki, though I would do something harmless and nice for practice. However, if you are going to remove my harmless notation of a teacher, please also remove the birth dated 1993 that says: 1993 - Sinead, who is really rad, was born. It's sorta useless too.
Wes —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ai4px (talk • contribs) 02:03, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey, just want to say thanks. I'm a new user who primarily reverts vandalism, nonsense etc. Half the time you manage to revert it before I do :) Pursey 03:21, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Page protection

Hi Omnicron, I'd suggest a temporary semi-protection of your user and talk pages until the vandal gets bored. let me know if you'd like me to do this. Best, 03:34, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

User:69.180.102.202

Hi,

I've just received an automatic message I think is from you. I edited the Franklin D. Roosevelt article, specifically the link "[Historical rankings of United States Presidents scholarly surveys]" because it's not actually a link, it doesn't take you to any page. I put "[Historical rankings of United States Presidents]", which is an actual link.

Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.180.102.202 (talk • contribs) 03:54, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Sure, you're more than welcome to make that change. The revert/warning was over this, though: [2]
If that was a mistake, don't worry about it, it's been fixed. Thanks -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:55, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Really?

Yes, lets clall a truce while I look for a source. =) -68.202.16.122 04:16, 14 October 2006 (UTC) I'm finding it alot on fan sites, but I'd rather cite it on a sports news site.

reason for change

Hi,
My history teacher gave us homework to make a minor but random and incorrect change to Wikipedia because my class has been trying to convince him to let us use this site, which he believes is inaccurate. We challenged him that all the edits go away within 5 minutes.
I would never purposely spread false information. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.19.48.213 (talk • contribs) 04:10, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Could you please tell your teacher that he is an irresponsible enemy of knowledge for encouraging people to vandalize Wikipedia and should recommend for people to make improvements to the community pool of knowledge rather than damage it? -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:12, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

not sure how to answer that last one and keep it in the same box...

yes, i will be sure to pass on the message. i felt badly, so i went back and added something that is possibly of use about what happened to the Tories after the war was over. it's not terribly important, but it's kind of interesting. and it's true. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.19.48.213 (talk • contribs) 04:19, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

I responded to this on your talk page. Sorry if I was preachy, I was kind of half-joking above anyway. Thanks for making amends like that, it's admirable. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:22, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

i have no idea if this is the right way to answer this...and i got your message on my talk page. didn't even know what that was or how to use it. maybe i should invest in a wikipedia account. you weren't preachy, i can see where you are coming from. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.19.48.213 (talk • contribs) 04:24, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

We'd love to have you here. Here's where you can sign up: link

Feel free to message me if and when you make an account, and I'll be happy to help you (and without the mouthiness this time!). -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:26, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

cool, i just signed up. don't worry about the "mouthiness". frustration is understandable. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Puravida06 (talk • contribs) 04:31, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

thanks!

thanks so much for all your help. if it's ok, i imagine i will be asking you for advice on how to set up my account and what not, now that i have made one.
as of now, however, i am going to head off to bed. it's getting late and i have to take the SATs in the morning.
thanks again for everything, imagine i'll hear from you again. ~maria 04:50, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Nate Stein, Pro Wrestling Unplugged

I'm so confused how people who are starting a deletion war against two entities, despite statements from those people that were hateful in message & support from other saying to not delete it due to being valid, yet those articles will still get deleted. It's absolutely insane. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 199.111.68.154 (talk • contribs) 04:25, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Franklin D. Roosevelt

I was not experimenting with the Franklin D. Roosevelt page; someone had deleted roughly half of the article, from 1932 or so onwards, and I was restoring the original page. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me again. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.116.64.166 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

I see what happened -- you were beaten to it by a slim margin and you actually reverted back to vandalized version: [3]
No big deal, though, it's all good now. Thanks for trying to help out. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 16:54, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Billy Meier

Okay, I see how that works. I agree ENTIRELY that the adding of 'fraudulent' under Billy Meier is a violation of neutrality. Seeing as how there's no conclusive proof either way, the photos may be real and they may be fake. This makes me wonder, however, if the same is not true for Al Qaeda? Al Qaeda and September 11....no CONCLUSIVE proof either way. Not a single shred of evidence on either side that hasn't been subjected not only to debate, but to EXTENSIVE debate. So, in just the way that Billy Meier's article can not be stated either way, Al Qaeda should not be either. It seems to me that pointing the finger at Al Qaeda without conclusive proof violates neutrality because it expresses YOUR opinion (which is just as much a violation of neturality as my opinion is.) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by All5Horizons (talk • contribs) 18:31, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

hi

WHAT A NERD! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ninjafrog123 (talk • contribs) 19:40, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

chess links

Hello,

You removed my link from the chess page of this site. At one point my link was posted on this page and removed for the following reason... Since it showed up in the review of correspondence chess servers it was stated that it did not need to be listed. Since then Red Hot Pawn and Schemingmind have added their links however they also show up in this review. If the Chess Maniac link is not allowed than these two links should also be removed.

Thanks for you help,

DennisChessmaniac 20:25, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

User:Angleoflove2

hi i'm sorry to i somtome just get carred away and i'm really bord so i do it i'll try not to do it more and well i have to do a projeck on paleo indians and i was bord so sorryangleoflove2 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Angleoflove2 (talk • contribs) 22:34, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Irrelevant?

Not at all, especially if the person has no relation to Judaism, what makes him Jewish if one of his parent's weren't? 141.211.251.69 18:40, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

I think I misread you. Sorry, my fault. I'll put your edits back. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 18:41, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

No prob. 141.211.251.69 18:45, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

bigot

This user changes anything disagree with, even if it is truthful. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Betterer87 (talk • contribs) 19:43, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Elephant

But Colbert said that it did. I believe Colbert. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.163.65.156 (talk • contribs) 20:13, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Umm...

I was editting something completely POV... it said "a word used by homophobic men to make themselves feel more manly" that isn't even accurate and is vandalism itself. Revert it yourself or I will. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.83.1.185 (talk • contribs) 20:13, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

R.e:Thanks

It's no problem! Hopefully you'll get some peace after AiV has taken care of him/her --Casper2k3 21:00, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

I've never given a Barnstar before. If it doesn't go there pls put it where it's supposed to. Just figured you deserved one. --Home Computer 21:38, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Invest Sign on deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Invest Sign. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aferistas (talk • contribs) 22:56, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Smile

Alphachimp has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Thanks for the nice note on my talk. I responded there, but I figured it'd be dumb to smile on my own talk page. Alphachimp 00:53, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Hello

You can move any UserBox You want to User:Menasim/Userboxes/User X Your Friend --Menasim( discuss | ) 01:09, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

User:205.188.116.70

I made an honest edit on the history of Baluchistan. I took out a line that was redundant and added some clarification. I think you should revert the edit that I made.

Moin Ansari —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.188.116.70 (talk • contribs) 03:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

I can't find the edit in question. Sorry, you're going to have to present a link to it if I am to do this for you. Otherwise, if I have reverted you in error, please accept my apologies and know that if you are making a good faith modification to Wikipedia, you are more than welcome to. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:28, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

No worries

Its ok mate, we all have to work together to make wikipedia a better place, thanks for the welcome!

--Suicidal tendancies 17:15, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Infobox

Trying to reach an infobox consensus here: [4]. Please can you weigh-in with your opinion?129.127.28.3 11:46, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

my brother

my brother was screwing with my computer so thats why all that crap was there —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.17.67.83 (talk

So call attack on yamila

This so called person threatened me, so I would remind you to warn her before you single me out

Many thanks

Thanks for the revert on my talk page. More typical infantile vandalism... what would a day at Wikipedia be like without it? :-) Heimstern Läufer 00:45, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Ann Coulter

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Devilmaycares (talk • contribs) 01:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Wow

Don't blame me for something I didn't do. I'm not into politics, so really, I wouldn't change the George Bush page. Check who it is your yelling at before you yell. Oh, and by the way, I'm NEW, I don't know what the heck a sandbox is. Bye.--Tishii 01:07, 18 October 2006 (UTC)