Talk:Cloverfield: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:48, 6 February 2018

Cloverfield was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 9, 2016). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cloverfield article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 30 days

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Science Fiction Mid‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Horror Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about the film. Fan sites, forums, personal theories, and speculation are unverifiable and/or original research. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about the film. Fan sites, forums, personal theories, and speculation are unverifiable and/or original research at the Reference desk.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Cloverfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Space station crash

"Unnoticed by the characters, an indiscernible object falls from the sky into the ocean"

This links to the space station, but do we know for sure that's what it was in the first film? The viral marketing of the first one claimed it was a satellite, and i didn't hear anything in the 3rd film saying it was the space station. Also, didn't the station only crash in the other dimension (Jensen's)? Is there anything to support the idea that it also occurred in the main reality, and if so, how does one account for the time anomaly of the creature (now multiple ones) being awoken prior to the space station coming back to that reality? I'm going to remove the link for now; unless someone knows of some evidence (or perhaps viral marketing) that said the object in the first film was the space station, it seems like speculation. --Stevehim (talk) 07:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To me, the scene's pacing looks a lot like the reentry of the capsule at the end of Paradox. --uKER (talk) 13:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

:: But the monster(s) are already there before the space station even gets back, and we never see anything to suggest that happened in the main reality, afaik.  --Stevehim (talk) 23:48, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 13:02, 6 February 2018 edit UKER (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 19,772 edits →Space station crash ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:48, 6 February 2018 edit undo Stevehim (talk \| contribs) 185 edits →Space station crash Next edit →
Line 49:		Line 49:

	:To me, the scene's pacing looks a lot like the reentry of the capsule at the end of Paradox. --[[User:UKER\|uKER]] ([[User talk:UKER\|talk]]) 13:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)		:To me, the scene's pacing looks a lot like the reentry of the capsule at the end of Paradox. --[[User:UKER\|uKER]] ([[User talk:UKER\|talk]]) 13:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

			:: But the monster(s) are already there before the space station even gets back, and we never see anything to suggest that happened in the main reality, afaik. --[[User:Stevehim\|Stevehim]] ([[User talk:Stevehim\|talk]]) 23:48, 6 February 2018 (UTC)