Jump to content

User talk:NYMetro96: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Luca M (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:

[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] This is your '''only warning'''; if you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia again, as you did at [[:Hassan Ndam]], you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im -->


== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] ==
== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] ==



Revision as of 00:15, 21 February 2019

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Hassan Ndam, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.


Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (2016 New York Red Bulls season) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 2016 New York Red Bulls season, DBonino!

Wikipedia editor MB298 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good start, various cleanup tasks may need to be performed (for example, categories).

To reply, leave a comment on MB298's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Category:New York Red Bulls II players

Hey mate, first off, I have seen your work when it comes to pages pertaining to the New York Red Bulls and the New York Red Bulls II and I really do appreciate the work and love it. However, I noticed that you removed the Category:New York Red Bulls II players from one of the players who were not on the team anymore. That should not happen. The category is for current and past players, not just the current. Just thought I tell you for future purposes. Cheers. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 16:33, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 3 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:JuniorFlemmings-2016.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:JuniorFlemmings-2016.jpg, which you've attributed to Alena Schuckmann. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Majora (talk) 03:34, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 Major League Soccer season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emmanuel Boateng. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 21 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Invite to the African Destubathon

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, NYMetro96. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Royer

The clubs where he was only there for a season don't need a totals line. You also deleted the line for Hannover 96 II. Reserve teams in Germany play in regular men leagues in Germany. Kingjeff (talk) 01:49, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RE: MLS Roster

Hey,

I was amended the coloring so there's a border for some clubs, meaning clubs with 3 primary colors it looks marginally better.

As for changing to the European layout - don't do that! There was a huge Wikipedia debate/discussion and it was settled on the current format for various reasons. It is better - it looks better, works on mobile, is sortable, etc.

Cheers! UncleTupelo1 (talk) 16:15, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 26 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2017 Major League Soccer season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orlando City. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Atlantic Cup (Major League Soccer), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rodney Wallace and Galin Ivanov. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, NYMetro96. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 CONCACAF Champions League, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Santa Tecla and San José (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

re:New York Red Bulls 17/18

 Done but what about shorts and socks?--Luca•M 15:49, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I don't know, in the webshop there are only the 2016-17 kits and there aren't any news about a 2018 home kit...--Luca•M 20:23, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
we have a problem.--Luca•M 20:24, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Done you need to refresh the page, there aren't any crests, sponsors, bulls and so on. i've drawn the 2017 kits.--Luca•M 15:43, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
away 2018
away 2017
home 2017

The article Brian White (soccer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 01:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tom Barlow (soccer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 01:19, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brian White (soccer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brian White (soccer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian White (soccer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mikemor92 (talk) 07:02, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kevin Politz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:06, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Niko De Vera for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Niko De Vera is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niko De Vera until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:13, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tom Barlow (soccer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Barlow (soccer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Barlow (soccer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PriceDL (talk) 00:36, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kevin Politz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Politz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Politz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:17, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018 New York Red Bulls season

Hey, bringing this here since we are in danger of getting caught out on WP:3RR. The "standard" for season articles is that pre-season is what it is, pre-season. There is no reason to include a separate scorers table for matches that pretty much mean nothing in grand scheme of things. We can definitely add WP:Prose about pre-season but that is as much. We should be keeping up to the standard set from articles in GA. I love your work on here and I see you all the time for Red Bulls articles, it is amazing. I work for the team and I love it but we still need to keep to the standard set here. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 13:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just wanted to message you to say sorry if my tone came across as harsh. Like I said, I do appreciate the work you do on Red Bulls articles and I hope to see you continue your contributions. Cheers. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 21:48, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This page was moved to draft week last week after the deletion discussion. Until he gets his first start, we should update it in it's draft state. Then move to main space when he gets his first start in a regular season game. WikiVirusC(talk) 23:00, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You probably already know this because you've been editing for a while, but please avoid cut-and-paste moves. They re undesirable because they split the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history. You should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Jack N. Stock (talk) 14:01, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, NYMetro96. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2019 New York Red Bulls season moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2019 New York Red Bulls season, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 18:09, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2019 New York Red Bulls season has been accepted

2019 New York Red Bulls season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:12, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of János Löbe

==  Proposed deletion of János Löbe ==
Notice

The article János Löbe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG, as the player has never made an appearance in a fully professional league, has never made a senior international appearance, and has no solid independent notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GPL93 (talk) 02:24, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@GPL93: Hello, I have moved the page to the Draftspace. NYMetro96 (talk) 03:40, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Even though I am a proud Fordham alum I think that that's best for now until he appears in his first professional match. I don't have a particularly strong take on the article and I believe it could still possibly pass GNG, I was just letting you know it had been PRODed after I realized that the editor had failed to notify you. Best, GPL93 (talk) 17:34, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Christian Ramirez (soccer, born 1991) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Glendale
Djordje Mihailovic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Glendale

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

re:New York Red Bulls 2019 Kit

 Done what about shorts and socks?--Luca•M 13:52, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Home 2019

Awesome, you're the best! All the pictures I saw seem to be with the standard red shorts and red socks.

can you link me them? PS if you don't sign after the {{reply to}}, I don't receive any notice.--Luca•M 10:20, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Luca M: Sorry about that! The only thing I can find that somewhat shows the shorts, but not socks is on Twitter. https://twitter.com/NewYorkRedBulls/status/1091071173985746945 NYMetro96 (talk) 00:06, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done the shorts are red with grey stripes, I haven't seen the socks so they're completely red.--Luca•M 09:29, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Luca M: Thanks so much! NYMetro96 (talk) 22:58, 10 February 2019 (UTC) @Luca M: Could you help me post the socks to this page? 2019 New York Red Bulls season. They keep showing as white when I paste the code in. NYMetro96 (talk) 23:45, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done--Luca•M 09:19, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]