User talk:OberRanks

Beware! This user's talk page is patrolled by talk page stalkers.

TALK PAGE RULES

1) All posts left here must conform to WP:AGF, WP:CIV, and WP:NPA. Violation talk page posts will be removed without comment.	2) If you have come here to discuss matters on a specific article, please take your concerns to the article talk page. I will transcribe all talk page posts here about articles to the appropriate article talk page.	3) I have been on Wikipedia for over a decade. Please don't template a regular.

The talk page for my former account "Husnock" also redirects here

Trivial awards

Hi OberRanks!

Sorry to pester you, I see you added content to the Golden Party Badge article. I'm having some trouble with one editor about what is allowed to be added and what isn't, regarding linking to an existing stand-alone article. I'm not asking for you to take sides, I'm trying to get some guidance here. I added to the content of the article by creating an Awards and Decorations section. I then added some awards and decorations and provided links to their own stand-alone pages on wiki. One editor in particular has now decided that some of them are "trivial" and I, and presumably anyone, is not allowed to refer to these stand-alone articles. This includes the Golden Party Badge and the Blood Order. I have had several sections of added content on the Röhm page, and others, deleted because of this so-called trivial/menial business, yet when I've asked for a hard and fast list of all the articles I'm not allowed to refer to via links, I've not been given one. I'm not sure why a stand-alone article exists if you're not allowed to link to it? What do you think I should do here? Just never refer to an existing article via a link or persevere and hope for the best. As it stands now I just add links and wait and see if they are deleted under this new totally ambiguous decision by this editor, and then wait for the inevitable aggressive warning. Not sure what to do! Could use your input on the Röhm talk page re this in general and the Golden Party Badge in particular. Sorry for bothering you mate Troy von Tempest (talk) 03:05, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

This a long running battle and, sadly, those of us who wish to include all Nazi awards in articles have been giving ground for about five years now. I answered on the talk page about using service record articles, which is at least a type of compromise, although even those types of articles may come under attack. I have actually given up this fight, and have taken my ranks and awards lists now to professional publications out in the real world. -O.R.^Comms 03:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Leipold appears to be correct

Check out the image at nl:Josef Leipold. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:01, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

They spelled it "Liepold" in the credits. I'm looking right at on Netflik :-) -O.R.^Comms 23:03, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Josef Leipold (credited as Josef Liepold) then. Or the explanatory note you just added, that works perfectly as well. Cheers, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:09, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for keeping such a close watch on that article. Please change the citation method if I didn't do it correctly. A woman I know sent me a link to a screenshot she uploaded from the credits as well. I tried to incorporate it. -O.R.^Comms 23:12, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Pages requested for citations

Hello, I have added {{Page needed}} tags to two citations at Service record of Karl Wolff and at Herbert Kappler [1][2], which were once added by you. Please be so kind and add the page numbers. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:05, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is OberRanks and fabricated sources. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:46, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely

You have been indefinitely blocked per community consensus. This has occurred per the very serious concerns about you presented at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents § OberRanks and fabricated sources and at User:Future Perfect at Sunrise/OberRanks, and as per clear and strong consensus at the ANI discussion for the block. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:40, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Hans Dobek for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hans Dobek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans Dobek until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:43, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Site banned

You are indefinitely banned from editing the English Wikipedia, by community consensus - ANI discussion. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:18, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Spa Lady

The article Spa Lady has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, no evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:31, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of SS Personnel Main Office

The article SS Personnel Main Office has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable administrative unit, largely or completely unsourced. Article created by User:OberRanks, known for systematically falsifying sources; what little sourcing there is is dubious.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:35, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Werner Pusch

The article Werner Pusch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced, no sign of notability. Article by User:OberRanks, known for systematic falsifications.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:36, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Germanic Proficiency Runes

The article Germanic Proficiency Runes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, dubious notability, created by User:OberRanks, known for systematic falsifications

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:38, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Deutsche Uniformen

The article Deutsche Uniformen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, no sign of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:41, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rolf Czurda

The article Rolf Czurda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable nazi officer. Article created by User:OberRanks, known for systematically falsifying sources. Sources are unverifiable primary sources and/or dubious; contents largely WP:OR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:10, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:KarlWolffLateWar.jpg

The file File:KarlWolffLateWar.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unknown provenance and copyright status. Dubious source claim by User:OberRanks, now banned for serial source falsifications. Source claim too vague to be verifiable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:42, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:AHWWII.jpg

The file File:AHWWII.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unknown provenance and copyright status. Dubious source claim by User:OberRanks, now banned for serial source falsifications. Source claim too vague to be verifiable. OberRanks has been known to lie about image sources repeatedly, so his claim that this is a free item from the National Archives cannot be believed without further proof.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:31, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Hans Peter Dengel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hans Peter Dengel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans Peter Dengel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:05, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Werner Herrmann for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Werner Herrmann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Werner Herrmann until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:34, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Deadline (1984 film)

The article Deadline (1984 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM. The reference states that film was released directly to video in the US. No secondary coverage except for fan sites.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 22:20, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Bolko von Schweinichen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bolko von Schweinichen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bolko von Schweinichen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:45, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Duniform.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Duniform.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Alfred Radermacher for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alfred Radermacher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Radermacher until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:12, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ReinhardHeydrichFutureSelf.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ReinhardHeydrichFutureSelf.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:RockwellMedals.jpg

The file File:RockwellMedals.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned, 0% chance these were drawn in paint.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. B (talk) 21:33, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

File:NPRCFrontFacingBuilding.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NPRCFrontFacingBuilding.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 21:45, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:KMSeniorChiefInsignia.jpg

The file File:KMSeniorChiefInsignia.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The "larger PD Image" from which this is said to be cropped was deleted per this request. The creator of this one, OberRanks, is site banned for chronic fabrication of sources including repeated copyright violations.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:47, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:CarpenterChiefKM.jpg

The file File:CarpenterChiefKM.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Based on File:KMSeniorChiefInsignia.jpg, which in turn was said to be cropped from File:Uffz Marine Portepee.jpg, which was deleted per this request. The uploader, OberRanks, is site banned for chronic fabrication of sources including repeated copyright violations.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:51, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LionGuardEmblem.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LionGuardEmblem.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:RockwellUSNRFOIANPRC.jpg

The file File:RockwellUSNRFOIANPRC.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, uploaded by User:OberRanks, dubious source information

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:28, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Ranks and insignia of the Hitler Youth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ranks and insignia of the Hitler Youth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranks and insignia of the Hitler Youth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Oberrottenführer

The article Oberrottenführer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable; Ranks and insignia of the Hitler Youth has been nominated for deletion. My BEFORE is just turning up passing mentions.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. buidhe 06:40, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

The person who operates this account in real life suffered some type of serious family loss last year and I believe he also had a mild heart attack. It is doubtful he has seen any of this. I can't speak to what he did on this website, but I would hope people do not wish him ill in real life. I just thought people should know. /Dee — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.36.37.43 (talk) 16:01, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Oberrottenführer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oberrottenführer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oberrottenführer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. buidhe 18:17, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sector admiral

The article Sector admiral has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned and unsourced article on a minor, largely made up, fictional element. While searches come up with a few pieces of fiction that use the phrase, there are no reliable sources discussing it in any substantial manner.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of File:FlakGunKMRate.jpg

The file File:FlakGunKMRate.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:FlyersRetiredBadge.jpg

The file File:FlyersRetiredBadge.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:KMVetChrvon.jpg

The file File:KMVetChrvon.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:KmChevron1.jpg

The file File:KmChevron1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:KMChevron3.jpg

The file File:KMChevron3.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 21 July 2019 (UTC)