Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→19:49:54, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Fizzylytics: Who is "we" Wikipedia accounts are strictly for single person use
Trubadur (talk | contribs)
22 edits
No edit summary
Line 589: Line 589:
[[User:Fizzylytics|Fizzylytics]] ([[User talk:Fizzylytics|talk]]) 19:49, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
[[User:Fizzylytics|Fizzylytics]] ([[User talk:Fizzylytics|talk]]) 19:49, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
:Who is "we" Wikipedia accounts are strictly for single person use. Please be sure to declare any conflict of interest. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 19:58, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
:Who is "we" Wikipedia accounts are strictly for single person use. Please be sure to declare any conflict of interest. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 19:58, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

== 20:53:47, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Trubadur ==
{{Lafc|username=Trubadur|ts=20:53:47, 12 September 2019|declined=Draft:Törzs}}

[[User:Trubadur|Trubadur]] ([[User talk:Trubadur|talk]]) 20:53, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
I have added a lot of reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject.

Revision as of 20:53, 12 September 2019

Main pageTalk pageSubmissions
Category, List, Sorting, Feed		ShowcaseParticipants
Apply, By subject		Reviewing instructions
Help deskBacklog
drives
Shortcuts
Welcome to the Articles for Creation help desk

  • This page is only for questions about article submissions—are you in the right place?
  • Do not provide your email address or other contact details. Answers will be provided on this page.
  • Watch out for scammers! If someone contacts you saying that they can get your draft published for payment, they are trying to scam you. Report such attempts here.
Ask a new question
Please check back often for answers.
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions


September 6

Request on 06:27:23, 6 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Markusandraos


I need help writing an article and making it not sound like an advertisement please.

Wiise Software Pty Ltd [Introduction] Wiise is an end-to-end, integrated, cloud-based business management platform created by KPMG Australia, built on Microsoft, and supported by the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA). Wiise is built on Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (BC) and tailored for small and medium-sized businesses in the Australian market.

[History] Wiise was created by KPMG Australia after acquiring Microsoft systems implementer, Hands-on Systems in 2015. Hands-on Systems was founded in 1985 and is one of Microsoft’s top global partners and is a complete Dynamics enterprise resource planning (AX, NAV) and CRM provider. Financials for Office 365 was spun out from Hands-On Systems in 2014 as a competitor to the likes of Xero and based on Microsoft Dynamics. The independent software vendor (ISV) was a finalist in the 2018 CRN Impact Awards and the 2014 World Wide Microsoft Dynamics Cloud Partner of the Year Awards. In July 2014, Financials for Office 365 won Microsoft’s Global Core Financials Award. After the acquisition, KPMG, CBA, and Microsoft formed a strategic partnership to co-develop Wiise, launching in the Australian market as of July 2018.

[Product] Wiise is an end-to-end business software with banking integration and built-in analytics and reporting, alongside accounting, HR, payroll, inventory and manufacturing functionality. Wiise is available on a subscription basis, as software-as-a-service. The three different packages available are Lite, Business, and Premium. All packages offer accounting, finance management and reporting, basic inventory management, receivables and payables, auto-reconciliation, HR and payroll. The more advanced packages offering more complex functionality for larger or more complicated business through advanced additional operational modules like distribution and warehousing, service management, and manufacturing.

[Awards and recognition] Wiise has been awarded Finalist for Microsoft’s 2019 Dynamics 365 Business Central Partner of the Year Award. The Microsoft Partner of the Year Awards goes to partners who demonstrate excellence in innovation and outstanding success implementing customer solutions based on Microsoft technology.

Markusandraos (talk) 06:27, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06:58:14, 6 September 2019 review of submission by Tommylagestam


Hi. I am requesting a re-review of this as it's a misinterpretation that B-Reel is the "parent company" of B-Reel Films. B-Reel Films (BRF) is an independent film and production studio. B-Reel is a creative (advertising) agency. B-Reel is in no way involved in B-Reel Film's notable work like the film Midsommar, the documentary about Greta Thunberg and the Alicia Vikander feature film Euphoria. Those are B-Reel Films (BRF) productions.

Wikipedia allows separate articles for advertising agency Saatchi & Saatchi and M&C Saatchi, even though they are intricately linked. B-Reel and B-Reel Films (BRF) are similarly separate entities. With world famous productions like those aforementioned, it is surprising why B-Reel Films (BRF) would not be considered notable.

Tommylagestam (talk) 06:58, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


07:01:19, 6 September 2019 review of submission by Sajacz


May i ask you why you decide that page is advertisement? I want only inform about company here based on other services here like: monday.com trello etc. what is difference ? and why monday and trello are ok ?

Sajacz (talk) 07:01, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sajacz: - so it was rejected on notability grounds because the only source it had came from the company itself. It also has a marketing tone, "Thanks to this overview", "saving you both time and work" etc. Normally I'd refer you to WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, which explains why you can't use one source being allowed/disallowed to justify another. However, Trello has over a dozen sources and is laid out neutrally. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:58, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Sajacz: I've tagged the page for Speedy deletion. You may want to review WP:INDEPENDENT WP:RS and WP:PUFFERY. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 05:27, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

07:27:21, 6 September 2019 review of submission by Maria Sitkina

I added additional references, please check it and approve Maria Sitkina (talk) 07:27, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


07:44:39, 6 September 2019 review of submission by Purple anka

Hi! My draft is declined due to being "not properly referenced by independent sources". I did add references, but they're all in the Ukrainian language. Am I only allowed to reference English-language sources when the Wiki article is in English? I was just trying to create an English copy of the existing article about a music band in Ukraine. Thanks for any tips! Purple anka (talk) 07:44, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Purple anka: - hi there. Ukrainian (or Russia etc) sources are fine - google translate does a reasonable job these days. Running through the sources, they generally aren't sufficient to prove notability for two reasons. Some aren't independent, as they are either directly from the band, or are interviews (where all the answers come from the band). Others aren't really in depth, with only a couple of lines on Karna. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:04, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:29:09, 6 September 2019 review of draft by Indigenus~enwiki


Hello, I have been advised that the multiple references for the draft article do not meet the criteria for notability. This is quite confusing, as the following references are multiple, and apparently meet the defined criteria for significant coverage in independent, reliable and secondary sources. Please see below:

1. Coverage in BloombergQuint.com, a prominent financial news portal formed as partnership between Bloomberg and Quintillion media (reference: https://www.bloomberg.com/company/press/bloomberg-forms-new-partnership-with-quintillion-media-in-india/). Coverage link: https://www.bloombergquint.com/business/startup-street-this-startup-says-it-can-nearly-wipe-out-your-electricity-bill

2. Coverage in ETEnergyworld.com, a part of The Economic Times, India's largest English financial daily, that focuses on energy news. Coverage link: https://energy.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/renewable/we-will-achieve-rs-100-cr-annual-revenue-this-financial-year-pranesh-chaudhary-founder-zunroof/70024921

3. Coverage in The Hindu Businessline, a leading, highly-credible financial daily in India. Coverage link: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/specials/clean-tech/lighting-up-your-home-right-from-the-roof/article27198508.ece

4. Coverage in CNBC-TV18, a leading financial news channel (an India-specific venture of CNBC), link: https://www.cnbctv18.com/young-turks/young-turks-troubled-with-high-electricity-bills-heres-how-zunroof-can-solve-your-problems-3828671.htm

5. Coverage in Moneycontrol.com, a prominent financial and business news portal owned by Network 18, a leading media company of India. Link: https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/this-startups-solar-power-solutions-is-making-indian-homes-green-and-future-ready-3971841.html

I feel that Zunroof meets the criteria for notability - however I am happy to take feedback from other editors.

Indigenus~enwiki (talk) 08:29, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have not received a response. Could someone please get back. Indigenus~enwiki (talk) 05:43, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10:54:05, 6 September 2019 review of submission by Swansonnery


I believe the topic could now be relevant to be included on Wikipedia. If you believe it still is not, I would really appreciate the reasons why, or even the criteria which needs to be met. Thanks!

Swansonnery (talk) 10:54, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:43:22, 6 September 2019 review of draft by 27.4.251.134


Hi there, it has been more than 50 days since Draft:Foundation Holdings is not yet reviewed. I requested some time back to review it and I am requesting again to kindly review the same. Thanks in advance!


27.4.251.134 (talk) 14:43, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was reviewed and rejected in the meantime for WP:UPE violations. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 05:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 7

02:39:12, 7 September 2019 review of submission by AlvinDaKin1342


AlvinDaKin1342 (talk) 02:39, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


02:44:52, 7 September 2019 review of submission by Amg seyiace


Amg seyiace (talk) 02:44, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seyiace biography?

Balogun Oluwaseyi Temitope (born February 7) better known by his stage name Seyi Ace is a Nigerian rapper, performer and songwriter. Seyi Ace is an Indigene of Ondo State but was raised and lives in Lagos. . He was signed to a Record Label (not mentioned) where he released he’s first few songs like Igboro. . Seyi Ace started commercial music in 2015 and has been releasing different jams ever since. . Seyi Ace has records like Weed and Dow which recorded over 100k streams on spotify. He released Waka On Stage in 2019 featuring Payper Boi produced by Seriki Poly . Seyi Ace has left he’s former Record Label and is currently with AMG (Ace Music Gang) where he released Record Label featuring Oladips and Davolee which was produced by Seriki Poly. . Seyi Ace has performed in different stages and shut down shows across Nigeria. He has performed alongside DMW signee Idowest and many others.

.

He was on University tour with Cowbell and performed to thousands of people at the Cowbell show. He performed at Obafemi Awolowo University and many others. . Some of the artists he has worked with includes Magneto, Oladips, Davolee, Seriki Poly, Paper Boi and many others. Unreleased records are yet to be produced too.

.

INSTAGRAM ACCOUNT OF SEYI ACE instagram.com/seyiace

06:16:28, 7 September 2019 review of submission by SUJIT KUMAR BISWAL


SUJIT KUMAR BISWAL (talk) 06:16, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 07:51:57, 7 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Zee2019


Hello,

I am trying to write article about zeeyarah since long time this is my 4th attempt that i got deleted this page. i don't where i am writing something wrong. If you need something for proof just let me know i am just writing about a company which will help people to know more about that company. this company is having all the genuine websites. if you have any doubt you can check the website and contact the company and know more about them. there is nothing wrong which i am writing about that company. please check the article again and please do let me know where do i need to make a change. i will be very thankfull to you.

08:14:02, 7 September 2019 review of submission by SUJIT KUMAR BISWAL


SUJIT KUMAR BISWAL (talk) 08:14, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@SUJIT KUMAR BISWAL: - you seem to have submitted this for review after it was accepted and converted to being an article. Is there a particular issue? Nosebagbear (talk) 22:17, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:15:43, 7 September 2019 review of draft by KeitaStudio


KeitaStudio (talk) 14:15, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Thsmi002, Thank You for feedback. Please can You tell me how can I do to resolve this problem that You wrote me? I would like to know how can I do to give significant coverage in the submitted content. The actress is present in the Internet Movie Database and in the cast of the tv series: Commissioner Manara (2011, Davide Marengo, Luca Ribuoli), The Young Montalbano (2015, Gianluca Maria Tavarelli). Let me know, thank You

Hi KeitaStudio. IMDb is user-generated, so it is not a reliable source. Mymovies.it is reliable, but indiscriminate. It aims to cover all of Italian cinema, so it doesn't help demonstrate notability. Google searches don't return independent, reliable, secondary sources containing significant coverage of Rogati, only primary source interviews with little or no analysis by the interviewer, tabloid and blog coverage, and trivial mentions. Revisit the topic in a few years, by which time more may have been written about Rogati in independent reliable sources. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:59, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:53:06, 7 September 2019 review of submission by RobHewes

I am a first time publisher, and although my page seems to have plenty of references, it has been declined for not being adequately supported by reliable sources. I'm unsure what more I need to do. RobHewes (talk) 16:53, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@RobHewes: - hi there. Sources showing notability need to be secondary, independent, reliable and in-depth. The large majority of your sources come from the club itself and so aren't secondary. The other big group are from southern athletic and only contain a league table - which isn't sufficient for Significant Coverage. Sources don't "stack", so 10 league tables in different sources don't show in-depth coverage. Nosebagbear (talk) 22:21, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


September 8

00:17:01, 8 September 2019 review of submission by Benjamin Quintela Saldanha Aguiam


3enjamin.A (talk) 00:17, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


COMBO 1,2 MYSQL-PASSWORD WIKIPEDIA EDIT MORE ALL OWNER MY NAME BENJAMIN QUINTELA SALDANHA AGUIAM

00:56:28, 8 September 2019 review of submission by Benjamin Quintela Saldanha Aguiam


3enjamin.A (talk) 00:56, 8 September 2019 (UTC) {{SAFESUBST:Void|[reply]

I lost memory so like know what is mine? maybe

Combo 1,2 mysql-password more a few things

no know


if have logins passwords is prove

i no know

need a big help

thanks

01:05:42, 8 September 2019 review of submission by Benjamin Quintela Saldanha Aguiam


3enjamin.A (talk) 01:05, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia i have any edit position ?

This is still not even suitable to be a draft, let alone an article as it has no content. I'm not sure what you are wanting to ask. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:29, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

05:16:45, 8 September 2019 review of submission by Chintan Rishabh Jain


Chintan Rishabh Jain (talk) 05:16, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Chintan Rishabh Jain: - you need to say what you want or are asking about. I confirmed the initial review 3 days ago (Sept 5th), if it's not about that, then please clarify. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:31, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10:48:44, 8 September 2019 review of submission by Kalpatru


Kalpatru (talk) 10:48, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kalpatru: - I'm not sure what you're asking about. This isn't currently submitted to become an article (see article wizard for that). However, it also has no reliable secondary sources, so it will automatically be rejected if submitted before being improved. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:16:48, 8 September 2019 review of submission by Aghiadhokan

I have noted that other software published wikipedia pages cite the official website as a reference, I have also put some additional references and the official Youtube channel of this application in order to directly refer to its features. The information is also generic and can be tested and proved by anyone who visits the official website, and download and test the application. Aghiadhokan (talk) 13:16, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Aghiadhokan:, while a link to the company's site should generally be included, it doesn't provide anything to showing notability. All the sources here are either non-independent (they're linked to vimert) and/or non-reliable (such as a wiki or youtube). As a product, it needs to meet the same higher notability guidelines as a company. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:22, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 9

08:45:05, 9 September 2019 review of submission by Timon Stathakis


Dear

Pls could you let me know how many more references i require to upload the article ? thank you

Timon Stathakis (talk) 08:45, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Timon Stathakis: - I rejected this draft as no independent/reliable sources contained any info on him, and a look elsewhere didn't indicate that any other such sources existed. I don't believe any degree of editing can fix this - he just doesn't appear notable, by wiki standards (yet) Nosebagbear (talk) 10:18, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:48:11, 9 September 2019 review of submission by Timon Stathakis


Dear Good day ,

pls could give me some advise in order to upload the article.

thank you

Timon Stathakis (talk) 08:48, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Answered above Nosebagbear (talk) 10:18, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks you update some further info for this to be notable. Hopefully this will improve the article.
@Timon Stathakis: - your sources are still all about the company (or written by the company), so tell us nothing about reliable/independent about the individual. Nosebagbear (talk) 12:58, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear i will to get some more reference reliable about the individual thanks for your feed back . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timon Stathakis (talk • contribs) 13:15, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:19:30, 9 September 2019 review of submission by CJLewis1990


Good Afternoon,

I understand & accept you have certain criteria for English football clubs however I would like to appeal for a re-review in this instance.

I am a senior volunteer for the club and everything about the way the club is set up and is being run is professional. There are some key personnel involved with Wakefield AFC which is owned by FBT Sports. As you will see from the references provided, former Manchester United player Chris Turner is currently the Coach & Director of Football. Having a Wikipedia page is seen by all involved as a key part of our plans going forward. The page I have set up initially may lack in depth information however this will be frequently updated as the club progresses.

If you could re-review this I would be highly appreciative.

CJLewis1990 (talk) 11:19, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that in Wikipedia terms the club is not notable and Wikipedia has no interest in your "plans going forward" it is not a venue for promotion of any kind. Theroadislong (talk) 12:22, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:54:18, 9 September 2019 review of submission by JamesRodir


Hello helpers, could you please describe why do you think the company is not notable enough or where the sources are weak and nonreliable? I have read WP:NCORP and I found that the sources I added are independent of the subject and the company has more than 1 million customers which I believe is a lot. They have been mentioned by the NY times, business insider, mastercard newsroom and a bunch of other press. They have a important partnership with Mastercard and even the Canada Revenue Agency allowed canadians to use Plastiq to pay taxes. And there is for example Cash App a mobile payment service with the same type of sources and I do not see how are they more notable. I appreciate your reply

JamesRodir (talk) 15:54, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The sources need to cover the company in-depth as far as I can see you have a lot of passing mentions, press releases and blogs none of which are sufficient to establish notability. The fact that other stuff exists is irrelevant. Theroadislong (talk) 16:39, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Theroadislong: I know its irrelevant but what I meant is that if they are live we as editors can use it as example. thats my logic there. Most of the articles are about plastiq and its services there are some that just mention the company but they help stablish notability I think. Take for example this one https://www.businessinsider.com/is-plastiq-app-worth-it-safe-2018-6 or https://www.pymnts.com/news/b2b-payments/2018/plastiq-commercial-cards-electronic/ aren't these reliable sources? I need a little more insight because I still do not get why wouldn't Plastiq be notable enough for the encyclopedia. Its a company with many clients, press, great partnerships, and there are more than 70 results of Plastiq in google news, this has to count for something. JamesRodir (talk) 21:31, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:35:25, 9 September 2019 review of submission by Dancemaven


Hi there, I am requesting assistance because eight weeks have now passed since the Draft was submitted. Is there any way to expedite a review, or, at least to request that this draft receive some attention? Many thanks.

Dancemaven (talk) 17:35, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dancemaven: - due to the major backlog, the oldest of our drafts have been in the queue for twice that length. Most reviewers don't specifically target requested drafts, so a degree of patience will be required.
It's not required, but it might be worth seeing if you can get hyperlinks to the online versions of some of your more recent sources.
Particularly focus (sources and content) on the individual himself - it's not a combained Hollander/company article, so while obviously it will include content on that, it doesn't need a detailed run through of the company/studio's actions Nosebagbear (talk) 18:28, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:26:01, 9 September 2019 review of submission by Bibliograf


Colleagues, good afternoon. As per your suggestions, I've added three solid references, and I hope this will now suffice. Thank you.

Bibliograf (talk) 18:26, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've submitted it for review again on your behalf as a good case has been made for notability now being possible to show. Nosebagbear (talk) 18:34, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:44:25, 9 September 2019 review of draft by Fitwithjan

I just worked for 3 hours adding 27 references to Let It Be Art! new page and I pushed Publish these changes, but when I did, it disappeared on me. I wasn't thinking, I should have copied it. Where did it go, I am very upset, then when I tried to find out where it went, all I had was a blank page and of course you turned it down. Where did all my changes and original revisions and new references go to Let It Be Art! Why wasn't I given enough time to add all the references. I took three hours to do it, but I don't know where it is, PLEASE HELPPPP!!!Fitwithjan (talk) 18:44, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 19:33:04, 9 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by SKSVMACET19


We have a non profit making Engg college in a remote village in India. Wanted to give a small article on this college.


SKSVMACET19 (talk) 19:33, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 10

02:18:55, 10 September 2019 review of draft by Chamberednautilus


Check neutral point of view and notability for draft article titled "Adam S. Weinberg". Chamberednautilus (talk) 02:18, 10 September 2019 (UTC) I am requesting an opinion about whether or not the current draft article for "Adam S. Weinberg" meets the Wikipedia standard for 'neutral point of view'. Also, I would appreciate confirmation if the subject of this draft article meets the Wikipedia standard for 'notability'. This draft article was first submitted for review on 9 May 2019. I've made changes to the text in response to a reviewer's comment to create a more neutral point of view. Are any further changes recommended? Thank-you, Chamberednautilus[reply]

Hi Chamberednautilus. The draft has been in the pool to be reviewed since 16 May. The backlog stands at 5 months, so you can anticipate a review, which will consider the issues you raised, around the middle of October. --Worldbruce (talk) 10:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

04:27:28, 10 September 2019 review of draft by Farzanfa007

please review Draft:Manjappada Kerala Blasters Fan Club  it's urgent please..

Farzan F A 04:27, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

The page reads like an advertisement. Will require fundamental rewrite. This community is driven by volunteers, nothing is "urgent". Please do not act entitled. Coderzombie (talk) 09:04, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:50:54, 10 September 2019 review of submission by 167.98.1.141


167.98.1.141 (talk) 08:50, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:47:41, 10 September 2019 review of submission by Chirag-Behre

Hello,

There was a grammatical error in the sentence which we have rectified and replaced it with the old one.

Kindly review the same.

Regards, Chirag-Behre (talk) 09:47, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chirag-Behre. Rejection is intended to be final, to convey that the subject is not notable, so no amount of editing will make the draft acceptable here. You may wish to consider alternative outlets that have different inclusion criteria. --Worldbruce (talk) 10:05, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10:26:20, 10 September 2019 review of submission by Chirag-Behre


Amit Ramani (born April 15, 1974) is an Indian entrepreneur who started Awfis Space Solutions (co-working spaces) in 2015 with 8 centers. Currently Awfis space solutions has centers in 8 cities across India with a total of 34 spaces. Amit Ramani is also the President and Managing Director of NELSON Asia, a leading group in Asia providing design and real estate consulting services.

Education

Amit Ramani graduated in B. Arch in the year 1994 from School of Planning & Architecture, New Delhi, India. He holds a Master’s degree in Architecture (Year 1999) from Kansas University, Manhattan Kansas. Additionally, he also holds a Master’s degree in Science (Year 2001) from Cornell University, Ithaca New York.

Career In the early years of his career, Amit worked as a Business partner with Bank of America. In April 2015, Amit Ramani established Awfis Space Solutions, with investment from The Three Sisters: Institutional Office, a family-run investment firm managed by Yes Bank founder Rana Kapoor’s daughters.

Chirag-Behre (talk) 10:26, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


10:30:38, 10 September 2019 review of submission by Chirag-Behre


May I know why it has not been approved by the Wikipedia team? What are the further steps I need to take further. Chirag-Behre (talk) 10:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


12:35:36, 10 September 2019 review of submission by Ahmedpgp75


Ahmedpgp75 (talk) 12:35, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ahmedpgp75: - as the reviewer said, we aren't a CV-listing service. They gave some helpful links (in blue) which if you click to them will explain in more detail Nosebagbear (talk) 15:06, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:02:56, 10 September 2019 review of submission by Rbiddis1


I'd like to be able to edit my wiki page and have it reviewed again. I have re-written the article to focus solely on Troublemaker (Band). I have also added several more references and items to show notability of the band. Please advise on how to move forward with my project. Thanks for your time and your help.

Rbiddis1 (talk) 13:02, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rbiddis1. Rejection is intended to be final, to convey that the topic (not just the current draft) is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). No amount of editing can fix that problem, so volunteers do not intend to review the draft again. If you have no conflict of interest with regard to the subject, then Articles for creation is an optional process for you, you may write directly at Troublemaker (band).
The reviewer's expert opinion is that if you do, the article will be deleted, and I concur. Sound Bites News, Houston Music News (which is a copy of Sound Bites News, so there's no point citing it), and Metal Maidens are primary source interviews where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves, a type of source explicitly excluded from those that can demonstrate notabiliy. The Bash is a capsule history provided by the band. Like the interviews, it is not independent. CDbaby.com is a reliable source for the existence of a recording, but existence of a recording doesn't make a band notable. And Reverbnation is a marketing platform, not a reliable source. Novice editors are commonly advised to cite at least three indpendent, reliable, secondary sources that contain significant coverage of their topic. The draft cites no such sources. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:07, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:40:57, 10 September 2019 review of draft by Laura.vepraskas


Hi! I believe it has been 8 weeks since my last submission. Is there anything my team can do to help move the review process forward. Happy to help in any way I can. Thanl you! Laura.vepraskas (talk) 13:40, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold pending paid editing disclosure, see User talk:Laura.vepraskas#Declare any connection. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:33, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Laura.vepraskas: Thank you for your declaration. Most businesses, including Syncfusion, are not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:09, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:06:23, 10 September 2019 review of draft by Parinthacker


The page that I have requested for creation was rejected. I have since then made appropriate changes to bring it in line with Wikipedia policies and standards. The submission is pending for more than 2 months now. Can I please get some help in this matter?

Parinthacker (talk) 14:06, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Parinthacker. When you posted your question, you were presented with a large pink box that said, among other things: "If you are waiting for a reviewer to review your draft, please be patient, as drafts are reviewed in no specific order. The reviewing process currently has a 2+ months backlog, with 4,469 pending submissions waiting for review. Please do not ask for a reviewer to tell you the status of your draft or to review it faster." One part of that might be unclear. "2+ months" is currently "5 months". So you can anticipate a review around the first week of December. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:40, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:32:16, 10 September 2019 review of draft by 68.103.78.155


68.103.78.155 (talk) 16:32, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We Will Have To Wait About Three Weeks For This Article So We Will Have To Find Out. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 16:32, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:35:12, 10 September 2019 review of draft by 68.103.78.155


68.103.78.155 (talk) 16:35, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's A little Bit Too Soon But Hopefully it will be an article because the postseason Begins in About Three Weeks. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 16:35, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:59:00, 10 September 2019 review of submission by 41.215.173.71


41.215.173.71 (talk) 18:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@41.215.173.71: - the draft didn't have any references and s otherwise doesn't appear notable (in the sense that there might be non-included reliable sources) Nosebagbear (talk) 20:27, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

20:15:21, 10 September 2019 review of submission by Ashley198299


Ashley198299 (talk) 20:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G11ed for overt advertising Nosebagbear (talk) 20:28, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
To expand a little, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not free ad space. A company's "about us" page dripping in superlatives is not an encyclopedia article, even if copy-pasting it to Wikipedia wouldn't be a copyright violation. Huon (talk) 20:42, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 11

10:17:13, 11 September 2019 review of submission by UseTheWiki


Hey, Any tips for making this article better? I believe I have found enough citations. I am still learning the ropes of writing new articles. UseTheWiki (talk) 10:17, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has been rejected, he is not notable in Wikipedia terms, IMDb and Soundcloud are not reliable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 15:08, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:49:17, 11 September 2019 review of draft by Tonyswan18


Hi, I tried to post the article "DoULike", but it was declined because it looks like an advertisement. So now, I would like to know what exactly seems in my text like advertisement. I'd like to improve it, but don't know in what way. I tried to use only facts and all reference sources that I have. Maybe you could help me and focus on what I need to change or in what parts I need to use additional references. Thanks, Tony

Tonyswan18 (talk) 14:49, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"ALL aspects of the draft read like an advert, "targeting the needs of a multi-national audience" "the platform became more popular" "model is dependent on several essentials: advertisement featured on the website and premium subscriptions on top of the free usage model." "present in social media: Facebook, Twitter and Instagram"etc,etc. etc. Theroadislong (talk) 15:05, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:29:50, 11 September 2019 review of submission by Abhayjaxen73


Abhayjaxen73 (talk) 16:29, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Abhayjaxen73: Assuming this formatted properly, it still wouldn't be a suitable encyclopedic article. If nothing else, because it doesn't assert a reason as to why you are notable (by wiki standards, that is). It would also need multiple reliable, independent, secondary sources. Please have a read of why we discourage autobiographies. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:40, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:21:51, 11 September 2019 review of submission by Neelpurohit19


Hey,

I think my page should be allowed to be on wikipedia as I am a very notable person (not famous) but notable in Dubai, especially amongst all the schools. I have 1400 instagram followers which doesn't sound like alot but all of them are mainly from Dubai and the school students all know me. I think I should have this page even if it is for a short amount of time as I am doing it for a school project + personal interest.

Please do allow it.

Neelpurohit19 (talk) 17:21, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


17:23:22, 11 September 2019 review of submission by Akpodeyoh


Akpodeyoh (talk) 17:23, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

22:40, 11 September 2019 SuperMarioMan talk contribs deleted page Draft:Isaiah O. (G5: Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban) (thank) - go on, nothing more to see here. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 14:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have written up a draft for artist Laurent Dareau and have submitted it under the article wizard. My question is what is my next step to get the post approved and published? Thank you

draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Laurent_Dareau

18:42:57, 11 September 2019 review of submission by Dareaujulia

Draft:Laurent Dareau

JD 18:42, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

@Dareaujulia: - hi there. What in particular can we help you with? Nosebagbear (talk) 21:43, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Dareaujulia: On your behalf I've submitted the draft for review. There is a huge backlog, so it may be five months before it is reviewed. You may continue improving it while you wait, or see Wikipedia:Community portal for other ways to help improve Wikipedia. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:41, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:59:14, 11 September 2019 review of draft by Wcg98


The page created provides more detail on the product CodeSonar mentioned on the GrammaTech page. Other static analysis products such as Polyspace, Coverity, Klocwork have similar pages. In fact, the page List of tools for static code analysis includes CodeSonar yet the link to the product is conspicuous by its absence.

What else is needed to prove this product is "notable."

Wcg98 (talk) 18:59, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wcg98: - currently there is only one reliable, independent, secondary source - it needs at least 2 and preferably 3. While it's worth reading WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS which shows why the existence of one article doesn't support another, however those articles do include more suitable sources. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:40, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

21:46:23, 11 September 2019 review of submission by Namrathacivil

Hi recently my article civil engineering systems was declined saying the content matched civil engineering, although it is a lesser known fact that civil engineering systems is different. Namrathacivil (talk) 21:46, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


September 12

00:28:36, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Oneonta1776


Thank you for the feedback. I understand the comment to include this information in the entry on Yohanan Petrovsky Shtern. However, when I originally did that, several weeks ago, my efforts were repeatedly erased by someone who I think must be a troll of some sorts because no credible answer was given for erasing the information, which is well substantiated by independent sources. Can you help please? Yes, I'd like to enter this information in that entry for Yohanan Petrovsky Shtern. Thank you.

Oneonta1776 (talk) 00:28, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold pending disclosure of use of multiple accounts, see User talk:Oneonta1776#One person, one account. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:19, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06:26:43, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Chirag-Behre

We have made minor tweaks in the content. Kindly please review the same. Chirag-Behre (talk) 06:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Chirag-Behre: - the article was rejected for not showing notability - just editing the content will never demonstrate it. It's only worth asking if you find at least 2 good reliable, independent, in-depth secondary sources. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06:44:00, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Ken9991032

Hi I am a new editor of Wiki. For this case, I would like to know how to improve the skills of editing Wiki. Would you mind to give me some suggestion on it. Thank you very much.

Ken9991032 (talk) 06:44, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ken9991032: - The wikipedia adventure is an interactive tutorial that's quite good at getting the basics along. You should also read WP:NOTPROMO, as your draft would need a major rewrite to be more suitable. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:23, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:17:30, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Ahmedpgp75


Ahmedpgp75 (talk) 08:17, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ahmedpgp75: - I answered what I felt was your most likely issue several days ago (about half a page up) Nosebagbear (talk) 10:25, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:24:34, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Bethany m m


Hi, I have removed links that did not comply, please can I re-submit for publication? Thanks

Bethany m m (talk) 11:24, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold pending paid editing disclosure, see User talk:Bethany m m#Violation of terms of use. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:14, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:04:56, 12 September 2019 review of draft by Mj4841


I need to address my reasons for writing a blog entry, specifically to clarify that I am unpaid. Where can I make such a statement? By the way, here's what I plan to state: "I'm a writer involved in the health insurance industry, but am not being paid for my Wiki article and I am not affiliated with healthinsurance.org or their partners. Is there somewhere I can note this formally?"

Mj4841 (talk) 13:04, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mj4841: The best place to state this is on your user page. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:14, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:48:53, 12 September 2019 review of submission by JuntasCambiamos


Hi, my question actually is just about asking if there is a way for the article draft that I submitted to not be up for revision by AcF anymore, since I already discovered that it will be denied due to like of notability that i can find to use as references.

JuntasCambiamos (talk) 14:48, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JuntasCambiamos. If you would like Draft:Goleadoras to be deleted, add {{db-g7}} to the top of it. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:30, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:43:58, 12 September 2019 review of submission by MacOS Master


Because International has developed several notable, unique technologies used in products like The Shoe That Grows and Bednet Buddy. I believe that (especially with my revisions) this page meets notability standards due to heavy coverage of the company by media and deserves to be added to Wikipedia. Thank you!

MacOS Master (talk) 15:43, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:50:46, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Lullabying


I would like to get assistance in improving this article and bringing it up to Wikipedia standards. The topic received coverage over multiple news sources and has become a (morally questionable) Internet meme similar to the Sasebo slashing. lullabying (talk) 15:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

lullabying (talk) 15:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


15:56:17, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Mjl2012


Mjl2012 (talk) 15:56, 12 September 2019 (UTC) Hi, I'm just trying to understand why edits I made to a page of an author were't accepted. I got the information from the website and from reading their books and hearing them speak. The answer I received was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.[reply]

16:25:43, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Farzanfa007

we are fan club of kerala blasters FC from Kerala, India . what we want to do to get approval Farzan F A 16:25, 12 September 2019 (UTC)


17:15:03, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Mdmisri


Mdmisri (talk) 17:15, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:02:27, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Rbiddis1


Not sure if my previous request got lost? I don't see it on my page at all. Anyway, I have re-written the article to be specifically about Troublemaker (band). I have also found several more references for notability. How should I go about resubmitting my Wiki Article for review?

Thanks for all the help. I know you guys work hard on here.

Rbiddis1 (talk) 18:02, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


19:49:54, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Fizzylytics

We have submitted the page with necessary changes after our first attempt. It would be helpful if you guys can review the page as soon as possible. Fizzylytics (talk) 19:49, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Who is "we" Wikipedia accounts are strictly for single person use. Please be sure to declare any conflict of interest. Theroadislong (talk) 19:58, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

20:53:47, 12 September 2019 review of submission by Trubadur


Trubadur (talk) 20:53, 12 September 2019 (UTC) I have added a lot of reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject.[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&oldid=915369318"