Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
EFarda (talk | contribs)
6 edits
No edit summary
Line 490: Line 490:
Hello, This is Anwaar from Marooonfrog. I would like to ask for some help and guidance to get the article to be published.
Hello, This is Anwaar from Marooonfrog. I would like to ask for some help and guidance to get the article to be published.
[[User:MaroonFrogbh|MaroonFrogbh]] ([[User talk:MaroonFrogbh|talk]]) 05:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
[[User:MaroonFrogbh|MaroonFrogbh]] ([[User talk:MaroonFrogbh|talk]]) 05:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

== 09:54:47, 24 September 2019 review of submission by EFarda ==
{{Lafc|username=EFarda|ts=09:54:47, 24 September 2019|page=
Draft:EFard,_Banking_%26_Financial_Solutions
}}
I am told that "This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia". I am not sure what is the problem and how I can fix it
[[User:EFarda|EFarda]] ([[User talk:EFarda|talk]]) 09:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:54, 24 September 2019

Main pageTalk pageSubmissions
Category, List, Sorting, Feed		ShowcaseParticipants
Apply, By subject		Reviewing instructions
Help deskBacklog
drives
Shortcuts
Welcome to the Articles for Creation help desk

  • This page is only for questions about article submissions—are you in the right place?
  • Do not provide your email address or other contact details. Answers will be provided on this page.
  • Watch out for scammers! If someone contacts you saying that they can get your draft published for payment, they are trying to scam you. Report such attempts here.
Ask a new question
Please check back often for answers.
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions


September 18

03:29:12, 18 September 2019 review of submission by Lifelonglearning1

{{Lafc|username=Lifelonglearning1|ts=03:29:12, 18 September 2019|page= — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lifelonglearning1 (talk • contribs)

Request on 04:42:45, 18 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Ada Wan


Hi Wiki, I do not understand why this article is being rejected because it is not significant enough. As I see Wikipedia is a platform to share knowledge and information and there always will be some topics or articles that are not interesting or significant for others. Please assist me. Thank you.


Ada Wan (talk) 04:42, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold pending paid editing disclosure, see User talk:Ada Wan#Declare any connection. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:11, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

05:52:13, 18 September 2019 review of submission by Ka1591915

I would like to request assistance with this page because the topic covers a prominent cultural practitioner of the Hawaiian community who deserves to have his story told. Could I please receive some additional information as to why this was rejected? Ka1591915 (talk) 05:52, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ka1591915: - it was rejected because the sources weren't suitable. To prove notability you need sources that are: in-depth, reliable, independent (which also rules out interviews) and secondary (newspapers, books etc). The Genealogy documents, the census and kaananiau's site are all primary, and also aren't in-depth (on Nunes himself) or fail independent (in the case of the site). The interview is also not independent because most of the content would come from a non-independent source. The obituary causes warnings to crop up all over my laptop so I've not seen that, but even as a good source, it wouldn't be enough on its own. Have a look at WP:GNG for a good summary of what you need. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:06, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06:12:57, 18 September 2019 review of draft by MaroonFrogbh


The following article is an introduction to readers to know about Al Salam Bank in Bahrain. and all the information in the article are informative and does not advertise anything related to Al Salam Bank. Could you kindly advice me on how can I improve the article pleas. Thank you! MaroonFrogbh (talk) 06:12, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MaroonFrogbh Greetings. May I know what is your connection with the bank? CASSIOPEIA(talk) 14:07, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is Anwaar from www.maroonfrog.com. We are a Marketing Agency based in Bahrain. Our client Alsalam Bank Bahrain has asked us to create online content on Wikipedia & the top online directories and other websites. This is the first time we create a Wikipedia page and we are not sure how we can do it right to get accepted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaroonFrogbh (talk • contribs) 05:48, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MaroonFrogbh: Post the mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MaroonFrogbh. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=MaroonFrogbh|employer=Maroon Frog|client=Alsalam Bank Bahrain}}. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:22, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06:31:34, 18 September 2019 review of submission by Chirag-Behre

Hello,

Thank you for your feedback. We have added a few reliable links for the content as reference.

Regards, Chirag-Behre (talk) 06:31, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:38:18, 18 September 2019 review of submission by Briannaburns123

Here is the code I submitted that was denied, can anyone give me any advice?

[copy of draft removed, the link above is sufficient --Worldbruce (talk) 14:21, 18 September 2019 (UTC)][reply]

Briannaburns123 (talk) 13:38, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Briannaburns123: Please read the declination reason at the top of your draft, as it contains helpful links for you to improve your draft. JTP (talk • contribs) 18:21, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:12:11, 18 September 2019 review of submission by Shaikh7977741665


@Shaikh7977741665: - Wikipedia isn't a "how-to" guide (WikiHow might work), but also the tone isn't correct - we don't use "We" or "our". There's also a concern that this would be a US-centric article: documents would range heavily region to region. Finally the article doesn't have any references. Nosebagbear (talk) 19:55, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Nosebagbear and Shaikh7977741665: and I don't think anyone will accept Copyright violations. 09:08, 19 September 2019 RHaworth talk contribs deleted page User:Shaikh7977741665/sandbox (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.compareclosing.com/blog/documents-for-refinance/) (thank) Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 09:40, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed! Nosebagbear (talk)

19:12:11, 18 September 2019 review of draft by Shaikh7977741665

Shaikh7977741665 (talk) 19:12, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the above Nosebagbear (talk)

20:43:01, 18 September 2019 review of submission by Shaikh7977741665


Shaikh7977741665 (talk) 20:43, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


23:19:38, 18 September 2019 review of draft by SamanGorilla


I think this article is being denied unfairly and the reason for denial is totally personal. I need a second eye for it.

SamanGorilla (talk) 23:19, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SamanGorilla. Most companies, including Elago, are not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:32, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]




Briannaburns123 (talk) 00:25, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

00:35:20, 19 September 2019 review of submission by Briannaburns123


I don't understand the "declination reason" for my article submission denial, can someone actually give me some help in the help desk? Help that I can actually understand so that I can correct it? Can anyone help me? Briannaburns123 (talk) 00:35, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Briannaburns123: - of course. Inline citations are the little blue numbers that appear at the end of sentences in many articles (e.g. Fairness Project). In most articles, they are only needed for potentially controversial or disputable statements or quotes. However, for biographies of living persons, stricter rules apply. Any potentially contentious material, at all, needs to have an inline citation.
Conveniently, you've already written your sources in a suitable format. I've cut the first one from the bottom and used it as an inline ref.
It's worth knowing you can name references. For example, I've named the example inline reference so it reads <ref name="De La Soul"> at the start of the citation. If you want to use that reference again, elsewhere in the article, you just need to write <ref name="De La Soul"/> instead of writing out the whole citation again. Nosebagbear (talk) 08:49, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 19

01:47:11, 19 September 2019 review of submission by MikeyMikeyMike


MikeyMikeyMike (talk) 01:47, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Hi,

I was provided this reason why the article I submitted wasn't approved:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability

Is it purely a judgement call if a topic is notable?

What tips can you provide in order for the article to be published?

If the topic isn't notable, which article should I incorporate my article into?

@MikeyMikeyMike: - notability is a general policy that applies to Wikipedia. There are specific guidelines for various topics. Companies and organisations use corporate notability.
If a draft/article is on the edge of notability it can be a judgement call, but a clearcut rejection that this received (and supported by me) is fully in line with the rules.
Firstly, you've used external links, whereas references should be one of the various methods you can see at referencing for beginners
I did however look at all of them. And all the sources/links failed on 1 of the 4 requirements for any source designed to show notability: reliable (generally reliable publication with editorial control); independent (no reason to be biased, such as an involved writer, or interviews); significant coverage about Engin itself (roughly 10+ lines that aren't quotes); secondary (newspapers, books etc). The corporate notability link above has a good explanation of each.
I'm not sure there is enough sourcing available to be found to demonstrate corporate notability Nosebagbear (talk) 08:57, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 03:01:02, 19 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Ada Wan


I wrote an article on Wikipedia and it got rejected. The reason is because the article is not significant enough for inclusion on wikipedia. However, Wikipedia is a platform for many topics and articles, there will always be articles that will not be significant or important, if my article get rejected because it is not significant to the person who reject it, then I think its sort of unreasonable to do. Ada Wan (talk) 03:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold pending paid editing disclosure, see User talk:Ada Wan#Declare any connection. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:13, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ada Wan: Thank you for your declaration. Most businesses, including APM Monaco, are not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:21, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

05:50:21, 19 September 2019 review of submission by LoLo0732


I request to edit draft:Johann_Brieger since he is a notable Austrian diplomat. The creator of the original topic did not offer major citations of media coverage besides primary sources and a shortened CV. Nevertheless, there is more than enough international media coverage that justifies an English wikipedia article.

Therefore, I want to reopen the article and add further sources, for example - by the government of Mauritius about Dr. Briegers recent visit: http://m.govmu.org/English/News/pages/NewsDetails.aspx?ItemId=5893 - by an independent Mauritius newspaper about Dr. Briegers recent visit: http://www.mauriceactu.mu/2019/07/30/maurice-et-lautriche-renforcent-leurs-relations-bilaterales/ - an article by The Diplomatic Society about one of his hosted events: http://www.thediplomaticsociety.co.za/archive/archive/2568-austrian-leadership-programs-alps - an article by the South African Development Community: https://www.sadc.int/news-events/news/sadc-and-austria-agree-areas-collaboration/ - an article by greentech.at: https://www.greentech.at/en/largest-solar-thermal-systems-south-of-the-sahara/

Thank you & best regards


LoLo0732 (talk) 05:50, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


06:10:48, 19 September 2019 review of submission by 182.72.99.58

This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. what kind of citation needed

182.72.99.58 (talk) 06:10, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10:43:33, 19 September 2019 review of submission by Juanestebanp94


After the notice of rejection of the contribution, I did a complete review of the content, structure and references. It pretends to tell what is the history and contributions of software to the world.

I am asking for a revision in order to get the necessary approval to appear on Wikipedia, thank you.

Juanestebanp94 (talk) 10:43, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to be blatant advertising. Theroadislong (talk) 11:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:48:43, 19 September 2019 review of draft by Oilisgood


We have a page for the Barjeel Art Foundation in the UAE and it has been denied publishing. I am trying to figure out what is wrong with the submission. The guidelines say to make sure it uses sources from multiple sources outside of the foundation. It appears we have and I do not know what is wrong on this front. Some references to name a few in the page are: - The National - The Guardian - New York Times - Whitechapel Gallery - Myart Guides - MORI Art Museum - Sharjha Museums - Casa Arabe - NYU Abu Dhabi

I am also trying to figure out what the difference that delineates something being an advertisement and it being a wikipedia page. The page should contain information about the foundation and what they do. The page contains facts and no opinions. So, I am unsure what the issue is.

Is it structure? Should we break things up into more list and categories? I am really at a dead end on where to go from here. :(

Thanks for your time and consideration on this issue.

Oilisgood (talk) 17:48, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Oilisgood. Please clarify what you mean by "we". Do you have a connection to the foundation that you have not disclosed? --Worldbruce (talk) 19:25, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Worldbruce. My connection to the foundation is that I took a class from Sultan Al-Qassim a few years ago at NYU and I do see him at events in the art world from time to time. But, I do not work with nor collaborate with him. I meant the we in the sense of people like me who are passionate about Modern Arab Art. (I'm a Cloud DevOps Manager at my day job) I am unsure how this content is going to get populated and out there if not by people who carry interest in the subject matter at hand. I would not want all of my Modern Arab Art information to come from someone who has zero connection to the Arab Art world. I can understand your concern about me being paid to do this. But, I promise you it strictly comes from a passion in the field. And the Barjeel is a very important piece of the puzzle that is the Arab Art World in general. It is a central hub for many people who navigate this area of the art world. I'd like to see it have a page so that it can be referenced when linking up different artists and their work. No compensation, no kickbacks. Just passion and interest. I don't know how else to say it.

September 20

00:06:30, 20 September 2019 review of submission by Talkfir


hi, i wanted to know, why u declined my page psybient, and psychill? lot of people dont know this, so i want that it will be exist, so they can learn more... thanks tal

Talkfir (talk) 00:06, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Talkfir. Draft:Psybient was declined because it is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The encyclopedia is not the place to "get the word out" about anything. --Worldbruce (talk) 03:41, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06:15:14, 20 September 2019 review of draft by Tonysy191



Hi! Good day!

I would like to ask for more information or help, so that I can publish this draft of mine? Your feedback will be gladly appreciated.

Thank you!

Tonysy191 (talk) 06:15, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

07:48:50, 20 September 2019 review of submission by Dickel1


I want to make edits on the article in order to respect Wikipedia terms and conditions. This was my first time posting an article and I was still not comfortable with the referencing part. I want to try again.

Could you please let me do the required edits?

Thank you Dickel1 (talk) 07:48, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


10:32:28, 20 September 2019 review of submission by Chirag-Behre

Hello Team,

As suggested by the team, we have made a few changes by adding some strong and reliable source of reference articles in the draft. I request the team to go through the updated draft and let us know your view on it.

Thank You! Chirag-Behre (talk) 10:32, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Who is "we', Wikipedia accounts are strictly for single person use, please declare any conflict of interest. Theroadislong (talk) 10:42, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:58:03, 20 September 2019 review of submission by MS KHAN K


MS KHAN K (talk) 14:58, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a venue for hosting your CV I'm afraid (like most of us) you are not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 15:48, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:11:46, 20 September 2019 review of submission by Bharat1


On what basis we have this article created: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lumbini_Gardens

Bharat1 (talk) 16:11, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:42:05, 20 September 2019 review of draft by Francis schichtel


Dear Wikipedia:

This wikipedia entry has been waiting to be posted for many more than 8 weeks. Is there some problem? Is there anything I can do to speed up this process?

Thank you Francis

Francis schichtel (talk) 16:42, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:47:36, 20 September 2019 review of draft by Kenpj


My project has been reviewed once. When will it be approved?


Kenpj (talk) 18:47, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kenpj: - this specific draft doesn't seem to have been reviewed before. In any case, it was submitted at the beginning of july - about 11 weeks ago. There are drafts 6 weeks older, as the submission rate is so much higher than it was last year. Nosebagbear (talk) 19:41, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:44:38, 20 September 2019 review of draft by Harrylangham


I want to know whether my article on Jean Jones has been submitted for review. Harrylangham (talk) 19:44, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No it hasn't... you need to click the blue box that says "Submit your draft for review". Theroadislong (talk) 21:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

23:31:25, 20 September 2019 review of submission by Wikicraigbez

Hi, I made changes to address all of the reviewer comments and thought I resubmitted for a re-review. This is my first article so I'm not familiar with the system. It's not clear to me what state the article is in. Is it in the queue to re-review or do I need to do something else to get that to happen? Thanks. - Craig Wikicraigbez (talk) 23:31, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikicraigbez: No, it's not in any queue right now. I could tell you how to resubmit it, but first I want to ask @Dan arndt: on what he thinks and if his plan was really to reject the draft, because this looks rather like a decline reason. @Dan arndt if your intention was indeed to decline, it looks like an odd bug in the script for me. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 05:08, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Victor Schmidt mobil, you are correct in your assumption- it wasn’t my intention to reject the draft but simply to decline it. Unfortunately there is/was a bug in the assessment script. Happy for the draft to be resubmitted if the issues about notability have been addressed. Dan arndt (talk) 05:15, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have changed the template so that it looks and works like it was intended. @Wikicraigbez If you think the draft is ready for re-review, there is a blue "Resubmit" button. Yust click it. The rest you should already know. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 05:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 21

03:38:03, 21 September 2019 review of submission by Bewithstartup


Bewithstartup (talk) 03:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bewithstartup: - you don't actually state what your question is. For the moment I've assumed it's a query about why the draft was rejected.
The draft was rejected correctly - the sources given are either not independent/reliable or, in the case of a discography, don't cover the subject in enough detail.
Musicians have specific criteria they need to satisfy to show their notability (any criterion is sufficient). They can be seen at musician notability. I don't believe Mr AJ currently meets these, though he may in the future. As such, tweaking the content wouldn't fix that issue. Nosebagbear (talk) 12:18, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06:36:28, 21 September 2019 review of submission by MS KHAN K

I want to re review my work becuase this is my own work and please guide me what can i change. MS KHAN K (talk) 06:36, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You (like most of us) are not notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Theroadislong (talk) 07:29, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06:50:43, 21 September 2019 review of submission by Ansh6007


Ansh6007 (talk) 06:50, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


06:54:51, 21 September 2019 review of submission by Ansh6007

please re review bec ause i have added the required information Ansh6007 (talk) 06:54, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but like most of us, you are not notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Theroadislong (talk) 07:31, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 10:49:59, 21 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Subrata Sarker (ENGR)


why my account is not publishing .?

Subrata Sarker (ENGR) (talk) 10:49, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Subrata Sarker (ENGR): - none of the sources in the article are suitable for proving notability. Either they aren't independent or they don't cover the subject (presumably yourself) in anywhere near enough detail. Nosebagbear (talk) 12:16, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:57:23, 21 September 2019 review of submission by Publicgujarat


Publicgujarat (talk) 19:57, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:57:23, 21 September 2019 review of submission by Publicgujarat

20:09:54, 21 September 2019 review of submission by Publicgujarat


Publicgujarat (talk) 20:09, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


21:48:34, 21 September 2019 review of submission by Kikiramomobami


Kikiramomobami (talk) 21:48, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


TAKE ME HOME.

September 22

07:24:35, 22 September 2019 review of submission by Ahmedpgp75

iam new to wikipedia.I want to learn and publish my article on wikipedia page.So please help me. Ahmedpgp75 (talk) 07:24, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ahmedpgp75. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Unlike websites such as Facebook or LinkedIn, it is not a place to write about yourself. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:56, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:04:24, 22 September 2019 review of submission by Publicgujarat


Publicgujarat (talk) 09:04, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


09:13:30, 22 September 2019 review of submission by Bholayadavmla

09:13:30, 22 September 2019 review of submission by Bholayadavmla

The article is about the current member of legislative assembly of bihar, india. He is one of the prominent and famous leader of Bihar. I think this article should be reviewed and published for public to know about him and his work for the beeterment of country. Bholayadavmla (talk) 09:13, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bholayadavmla: 13:08, 22 September 2019 DGG (talk | contribs) moved page Draft:Bhola Yadav to Bhola Yadav (Publishing accepted Articles for creation submission (AFCH 0.9.1)) (revert) (thank) - Wer'e done here. Congratiulations to your first article! If you have further questions regarding that article, you can ask at the Help desk. Victor Schmidt (talk) 12:32, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:26:50, 22 September 2019 review of submission by Sophisticatedcheese


Sophisticatedcheese (talk) 16:26, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sophisticatedcheese: As you have been told repeatedly, no reliable sources have been provided. I don't believe it is possible for you to do so. Please be advised that another submission without suitable sources may lead to it be submitted for deletion. Nosebagbear (talk) 18:14, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:27:22, 22 September 2019 review of submission by Sophisticatedcheese


Sophisticatedcheese (talk) 16:27, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Answered both above and below. Please do not make multiple submissions. Nosebagbear (talk) 18:15, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:31:40, 22 September 2019 review of submission by Sophisticatedcheese

Hi. I need help submitting this article. Thanks. Sophisticatedcheese (talk) 16:31, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You need to find sources for the draft first, it is pointless to re-submit with no sources it has zero chance of being accepted. Theroadislong (talk) 16:35, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:45:17, 22 September 2019 review of submission by Haushinka96


22:04:56, 22 September 2019 review of submission by Sophisticatedcheese


My apologies for resubmitting 3x before. This time around I've added a large number of reliable sources that I hope allows this article to finally be submitted. Thank you for reviewing.

Sophisticatedcheese (talk) 22:04, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb and YouTube are not reliable sources they need to be replaced. Theroadislong (talk) 22:10, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

22:16:22, 22 September 2019 review of submission by Sophisticatedcheese

Hello again and thanks once more. I've removed the Imdb and Youtube from the article. Sophisticatedcheese (talk) 22:16, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


22:31:28, 22 September 2019 review of submission by Sophisticatedcheese

Hi once more. Wikipedia as a reference was removed. Sophisticatedcheese (talk) 22:31, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


22:38:15, 22 September 2019 review of submission by Gettechy


Gettechy (talk) 22:38, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I was just wondering why the page was rejected because I submitted other sources besides Instagram. If I get rid of Instagram and the information cited from Instagram that I included, would that make it more reliable?Gettechy (talk) 22:38, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gettechy. It was rejected because the subject is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). No amount of editing can fix that problem. Wikipedia is not for advertising, promotion, or public relations. --Worldbruce (talk) 22:45, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

22:59:05, 22 September 2019 review of draft by Rupal246


Rupal246 (talk) 22:59, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 23

01:54:24, 23 September 2019 review of submission by Sophisticatedcheese

Hi, and thank you for taking your time in addressing my concern. How do I submit an article after making the recommended changes? On my article there's a STOP sign. I'm not finding a submit button like once before. Thank you. Sophisticatedcheese (talk) 01:54, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


04:18:12, 23 September 2019 review of submission by Willow2145


Willow2145 (talk) 04:18, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 06:38:47, 23 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Floyd1965


Hello Wikipedians,

I had created a draft which I wanted to publish but was declined because according to the reviewer the submission read more like an advertisement. Can anyone go through the link and suggest me what all is required to make the page more credible and neutral?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sameer_Sain

Floyd1965 (talk) 06:38, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:09:44, 23 September 2019 review of submission by Ahmedpgp75

I changed my username.Please review my sandbox--Ahmedpgp75 (talk) 08:09, 23 September 2019 (UTC) Ahmedpgp75 (talk) 08:09, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:32:40, 23 September 2019 review of submission by Wikiodia09


SubhraKant Sahoo is an Indian short films actor but people when search on wiki SubhraKant Sahoo then he not found him . So Add SubhraKant Sahoo's article to Wikipedia


Wikiodia09 (talk) 11:32, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As repeatedly pointed out to you, he is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia, you have provided zero reliable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 11:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:40:33, 23 September 2019 review of submission by NikhilKundra


NikhilKundra (talk) 11:40, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Request on 11:44:49, 23 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Sophisticatedcheese


Hello and thank you for taking your time reading my request. I'm looking to submit my article after finally making the recommended changes. The article was rejected in July, but I believe that it is an article worthy to be submitted to Wikipedia. Quality sources were eventually found and again, I made the recommended changes. Thank you.

Sophisticatedcheese (talk) 11:44, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:00:11, 23 September 2019 review of submission by 192.176.203.10


192.176.203.10 (talk) 13:00, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


13:08:25, 23 September 2019 review of submission by 223.29.222.176


223.29.222.176 (talk) 13:08, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


16:01:52, 23 September 2019 review of draft by FunctionalDuck


Hi, my first couple of submissions for an article (TITAN Sensor) were reviewed relatively quickly (within 24hrs), but it has been 6 weeks since my last submission and I have not heard back. I have made some changes since then to try to improve the article. I would like to move forward with the goal of ultimately getting the article approved. ANy help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!


FunctionalDuck (talk) 16:01, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Subsequently declined by Theroadislong. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:58:16, 23 September 2019 review of submission by 75.102.139.38

There are a lot of college players on wikipedia why not him as well? 75.102.139.38 (talk) 17:58, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because he fails WP:NHOOPS: to be deemed notable, a basketball player must have appeared in one game as either a player or head coach in the original American Basketball Association, Liga ACB, EuroLeague, National Basketball Association, National Basketball League (Australia), National Basketball League (United States), Lega Basket Serie A, Women's National Basketball Association, Greek Basket League and Israeli Basketball Premier League, have been selected in the first two rounds of the NBA draft, or have won an award, or led the league in a major statistical category of the Continental Basketball Association or NBA G League. JTP (talk • contribs) 21:53, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:27:48, 23 September 2019 review of submission by Smehra2801

Hello Wikipedia and Team, I have submitted all the notable proofs and news / media resources that I am having and assure about the personality - Goldy Hunjan or Goldy Hunjan Makeup Studio to be authentic. As I have got services from him and he is really an awesome personality known for his artistry skills. Done various events at government colleges and institutions. I just wanted to know with your permission, what more / exact notable proofs (as wiki declines with a message about more notability) are required to get my very first article on wikipedia as a contributor. I seriously wanted to contribute for the potential worthy person Goldy Hunjan as he is truly the best.

Please help me... Smehra2801 (talk) 18:27, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:20:17, 23 September 2019 review of draft by Paitken99


I'm trying to publish an entry and I've been asked to cite more published sources. Many of these sources are not available online. How do I verify sources that are not online? I can send PDFs. Is that permissible? If so how do I do this?

Also I've been asked to provided more newspaper articles. Should I provide multiple citations for the same fact?

Paitken99 (talk) 19:20, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


September 24

03:01:38, 24 September 2019 review of submission by Gameofdrones967

Hello, could this be reviewed? I believe it should be included on Wikipedia Gameofdrones967 (talk) 03:01, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gameofdrones967. Rejection is meant to be final, to convey that the topic is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). No amount of editing can fix that problem. There is no option to re-submit the draft because volunteers do not intend to review it again. You may wish to explore alternative outlets, with different inclusion criteria, for your writing. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:07, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

05:28:29, 24 September 2019 review of draft by MaroonFrogbh


Hello, This is Anwaar from Marooonfrog. I would like to ask for some help and guidance to get the article to be published. MaroonFrogbh (talk) 05:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:54:47, 24 September 2019 review of submission by EFarda

I am told that "This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia". I am not sure what is the problem and how I can fix it EFarda (talk) 09:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&oldid=917548017"