Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Tippy115 (talk | contribs)
51 edits
No edit summary
Tippy115 (talk | contribs)
51 edits
No edit summary
Line 503: Line 503:


Ashley Dennis 17:03, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Ashley Dennis 17:03, 27 September 2019 (UTC)


== 17:04:01, 27 September 2019 review of submission by Tippy115 ==
{{Lafc|username=Tippy115|ts=17:04:01, 27 September 2019|page=

}}

Ashley Dennis 17:04, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

why???

Revision as of 17:04, 27 September 2019

Main pageTalk pageSubmissions
Category, Sorting, Feed		ShowcaseParticipants
Apply, By subject		Reviewing instructions
Help deskBacklog
drives
Shortcuts
Welcome to the Articles for Creation help desk

  • This page is only for questions about article submissions—are you in the right place?
  • Do not provide your email address or other contact details. Answers will be provided on this page.
  • Watch out for scammers! If someone contacts you saying that they can get your draft published for payment, they are trying to scam you. Report such attempts here.
Ask a new question
Please check back often for answers.
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions


September 21

03:38:03, 21 September 2019 review of submission by Bewithstartup


Bewithstartup (talk) 03:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bewithstartup: - you don't actually state what your question is. For the moment I've assumed it's a query about why the draft was rejected.
The draft was rejected correctly - the sources given are either not independent/reliable or, in the case of a discography, don't cover the subject in enough detail.
Musicians have specific criteria they need to satisfy to show their notability (any criterion is sufficient). They can be seen at musician notability. I don't believe Mr AJ currently meets these, though he may in the future. As such, tweaking the content wouldn't fix that issue. Nosebagbear (talk) 12:18, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06:36:28, 21 September 2019 review of submission by MS KHAN K

I want to re review my work becuase this is my own work and please guide me what can i change. MS KHAN K (talk) 06:36, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You (like most of us) are not notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Theroadislong (talk) 07:29, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06:50:43, 21 September 2019 review of submission by Ansh6007


Ansh6007 (talk) 06:50, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


06:54:51, 21 September 2019 review of submission by Ansh6007

please re review bec ause i have added the required information Ansh6007 (talk) 06:54, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but like most of us, you are not notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Theroadislong (talk) 07:31, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 10:49:59, 21 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Subrata Sarker (ENGR)


why my account is not publishing .?

Subrata Sarker (ENGR) (talk) 10:49, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Subrata Sarker (ENGR): - none of the sources in the article are suitable for proving notability. Either they aren't independent or they don't cover the subject (presumably yourself) in anywhere near enough detail. Nosebagbear (talk) 12:16, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:57:23, 21 September 2019 review of submission by Publicgujarat


Publicgujarat (talk) 19:57, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:57:23, 21 September 2019 review of submission by Publicgujarat

20:09:54, 21 September 2019 review of submission by Publicgujarat


Publicgujarat (talk) 20:09, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


21:48:34, 21 September 2019 review of submission by Kikiramomobami


Kikiramomobami (talk) 21:48, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


TAKE ME HOME.

September 22

07:24:35, 22 September 2019 review of submission by Ahmedpgp75

iam new to wikipedia.I want to learn and publish my article on wikipedia page.So please help me. Ahmedpgp75 (talk) 07:24, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ahmedpgp75. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Unlike websites such as Facebook or LinkedIn, it is not a place to write about yourself. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:56, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:04:24, 22 September 2019 review of submission by Publicgujarat


Publicgujarat (talk) 09:04, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


09:13:30, 22 September 2019 review of submission by Bholayadavmla

09:13:30, 22 September 2019 review of submission by Bholayadavmla

The article is about the current member of legislative assembly of bihar, india. He is one of the prominent and famous leader of Bihar. I think this article should be reviewed and published for public to know about him and his work for the beeterment of country. Bholayadavmla (talk) 09:13, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bholayadavmla: 13:08, 22 September 2019 DGG (talk | contribs) moved page Draft:Bhola Yadav to Bhola Yadav (Publishing accepted Articles for creation submission (AFCH 0.9.1)) (revert) (thank) - Wer'e done here. Congratiulations to your first article! If you have further questions regarding that article, you can ask at the Help desk. Victor Schmidt (talk) 12:32, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:26:50, 22 September 2019 review of submission by Sophisticatedcheese


Sophisticatedcheese (talk) 16:26, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sophisticatedcheese: As you have been told repeatedly, no reliable sources have been provided. I don't believe it is possible for you to do so. Please be advised that another submission without suitable sources may lead to it be submitted for deletion. Nosebagbear (talk) 18:14, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:27:22, 22 September 2019 review of submission by Sophisticatedcheese


Sophisticatedcheese (talk) 16:27, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Answered both above and below. Please do not make multiple submissions. Nosebagbear (talk) 18:15, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:31:40, 22 September 2019 review of submission by Sophisticatedcheese

Hi. I need help submitting this article. Thanks. Sophisticatedcheese (talk) 16:31, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You need to find sources for the draft first, it is pointless to re-submit with no sources it has zero chance of being accepted. Theroadislong (talk) 16:35, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:45:17, 22 September 2019 review of submission by Haushinka96


22:04:56, 22 September 2019 review of submission by Sophisticatedcheese


My apologies for resubmitting 3x before. This time around I've added a large number of reliable sources that I hope allows this article to finally be submitted. Thank you for reviewing.

Sophisticatedcheese (talk) 22:04, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb and YouTube are not reliable sources they need to be replaced. Theroadislong (talk) 22:10, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

22:16:22, 22 September 2019 review of submission by Sophisticatedcheese

Hello again and thanks once more. I've removed the Imdb and Youtube from the article. Sophisticatedcheese (talk) 22:16, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


22:31:28, 22 September 2019 review of submission by Sophisticatedcheese

Hi once more. Wikipedia as a reference was removed. Sophisticatedcheese (talk) 22:31, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


22:38:15, 22 September 2019 review of submission by Gettechy


Gettechy (talk) 22:38, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I was just wondering why the page was rejected because I submitted other sources besides Instagram. If I get rid of Instagram and the information cited from Instagram that I included, would that make it more reliable?Gettechy (talk) 22:38, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gettechy. It was rejected because the subject is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). No amount of editing can fix that problem. Wikipedia is not for advertising, promotion, or public relations. --Worldbruce (talk) 22:45, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

22:59:05, 22 September 2019 review of draft by Rupal246


Rupal246 (talk) 22:59, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 23

01:54:24, 23 September 2019 review of submission by Sophisticatedcheese

Hi, and thank you for taking your time in addressing my concern. How do I submit an article after making the recommended changes? On my article there's a STOP sign. I'm not finding a submit button like once before. Thank you. Sophisticatedcheese (talk) 01:54, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sophisticatedcheese, that would be because the article was rejected as not being suitable vs just declined previously. Rejection is meant to be final, to convey that the topic is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). No amount of editing can fix that problem, only reliable, independent, sources can. Please ensure that you have read WP:YFA, WP:BIO, WP:RS, and WP:COI. Please do be careful and ensure that submitted drafts satisfy the criteria first, but you are certainly welcome to ask questions here. There is no option to re-submit the draft because volunteers do not intend to review it again. You may wish to explore alternative outlets, with different inclusion criteria, for your writing. --TheSandDoctor Talk 15:56, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

04:18:12, 23 September 2019 review of submission by Willow2145


Willow2145 (talk) 04:18, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Willow2145, I noticed that you did not make a comment or pose a question. How may we assist you? --TheSandDoctor Talk 15:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 06:38:47, 23 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Floyd1965


Hello Wikipedians,

I had created a draft which I wanted to publish but was declined because according to the reviewer the submission read more like an advertisement. Can anyone go through the link and suggest me what all is required to make the page more credible and neutral?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sameer_Sain

Floyd1965 (talk) 06:38, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:09:44, 23 September 2019 review of submission by Ahmedpgp75

I changed my username.Please review my sandbox--Ahmedpgp75 (talk) 08:09, 23 September 2019 (UTC) Ahmedpgp75 (talk) 08:09, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:32:40, 23 September 2019 review of submission by Wikiodia09


SubhraKant Sahoo is an Indian short films actor but people when search on wiki SubhraKant Sahoo then he not found him . So Add SubhraKant Sahoo's article to Wikipedia


Wikiodia09 (talk) 11:32, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As repeatedly pointed out to you, he is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia, you have provided zero reliable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 11:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:40:33, 23 September 2019 review of submission by NikhilKundra


NikhilKundra (talk) 11:40, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Request on 11:44:49, 23 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Sophisticatedcheese


Hello and thank you for taking your time reading my request. I'm looking to submit my article after finally making the recommended changes. The article was rejected in July, but I believe that it is an article worthy to be submitted to Wikipedia. Quality sources were eventually found and again, I made the recommended changes. Thank you.

Sophisticatedcheese (talk) 11:44, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:00:11, 23 September 2019 review of submission by 192.176.203.10


192.176.203.10 (talk) 13:00, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


13:08:25, 23 September 2019 review of submission by 223.29.222.176


223.29.222.176 (talk) 13:08, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


16:01:52, 23 September 2019 review of draft by FunctionalDuck


Hi, my first couple of submissions for an article (TITAN Sensor) were reviewed relatively quickly (within 24hrs), but it has been 6 weeks since my last submission and I have not heard back. I have made some changes since then to try to improve the article. I would like to move forward with the goal of ultimately getting the article approved. ANy help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!


FunctionalDuck (talk) 16:01, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Subsequently declined by Theroadislong. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:58:16, 23 September 2019 review of submission by 75.102.139.38

There are a lot of college players on wikipedia why not him as well? 75.102.139.38 (talk) 17:58, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because he fails WP:NHOOPS: to be deemed notable, a basketball player must have appeared in one game as either a player or head coach in the original American Basketball Association, Liga ACB, EuroLeague, National Basketball Association, National Basketball League (Australia), National Basketball League (United States), Lega Basket Serie A, Women's National Basketball Association, Greek Basket League and Israeli Basketball Premier League, have been selected in the first two rounds of the NBA draft, or have won an award, or led the league in a major statistical category of the Continental Basketball Association or NBA G League. JTP (talk • contribs) 21:53, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:27:48, 23 September 2019 review of submission by Smehra2801

Hello Wikipedia and Team, I have submitted all the notable proofs and news / media resources that I am having and assure about the personality - Goldy Hunjan or Goldy Hunjan Makeup Studio to be authentic. As I have got services from him and he is really an awesome personality known for his artistry skills. Done various events at government colleges and institutions. I just wanted to know with your permission, what more / exact notable proofs (as wiki declines with a message about more notability) are required to get my very first article on wikipedia as a contributor. I seriously wanted to contribute for the potential worthy person Goldy Hunjan as he is truly the best.

Please help me... Smehra2801 (talk) 18:27, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:20:17, 23 September 2019 review of draft by Paitken99


I'm trying to publish an entry and I've been asked to cite more published sources. Many of these sources are not available online. How do I verify sources that are not online? I can send PDFs. Is that permissible? If so how do I do this?

Also I've been asked to provided more newspaper articles. Should I provide multiple citations for the same fact?

Paitken99 (talk) 19:20, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


September 24

03:01:38, 24 September 2019 review of submission by Gameofdrones967

Hello, could this be reviewed? I believe it should be included on Wikipedia Gameofdrones967 (talk) 03:01, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gameofdrones967. Rejection is meant to be final, to convey that the topic is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). No amount of editing can fix that problem. There is no option to re-submit the draft because volunteers do not intend to review it again. You may wish to explore alternative outlets, with different inclusion criteria, for your writing. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:07, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

05:28:29, 24 September 2019 review of draft by MaroonFrogbh


Hello, This is Anwaar from Marooonfrog. I would like to ask for some help and guidance to get the article to be published. MaroonFrogbh (talk) 05:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:54:47, 24 September 2019 review of submission by EFarda

I am told that "This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia". I am not sure what is the problem and how I can fix it EFarda (talk) 09:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Filer was indeffed for promoting with an inappropriate username. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 07:41, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12:29:12, 24 September 2019 review of submission by Ketki R


a] I have 2 main queries: a] Why are following links not reliable? 1. ^ "Conatct Us - Kogta Financial". www.kogta.in. 2. ^ Jump up to:a b c Gooptu, Biswarup (November 29, 2018). "Finance company, Kogta Financial, raises Rs 154 crore" – via The Economic Times. 3. ^ "Morgan Stanley PE leads funding round in Jaipur-based lender Kogta". VCCircle. November 29, 2018. 4. ^ Jump up to:a b c Sriram, M. (November 6, 2018). "Commercial vehicle financier Kogta in talks with PE funds to raise up to ₹150 crore". www.livemint.com. 5. ^ https://www.kogta.in/images/pdf/Kogta_AR_2018_19.pdf 6. ^ http://www.careratings.com/upload/CompanyFiles/PR/Kogta%20Financial%20(India)%20Limited-01-02-2019.pdf 7. ^ "Kogta Financial (india) LTD Information - Kogta Financial (india) LTD Company Profile, Kogta Financial (india) LTD News on The Economic Times". The Economic Times. 8. ^ "India's first ever covered bond issue raises Rs 25 cr". The New Indian Express. 9. ^ "Kogta Financial raises Series A from IIFL Seed Ventures Fund". VCCircle. October 24, 2016. 10. ^ "Leadership - Kogta Financial". www.kogta.in. 11. ^ Narasimhan, T. E. (November 29, 2018). "Kogta raises Rs 1.54 bn from Morgan Stanley-managed fund, IIFL arm" – via Business Standard.

b] This is the easiest way of writing, what changes are needed in writing the content? Kogta Financial (India) Limited is a retail-focused non-banking financial company. [2]. The company’s head office is in Rajasthan, India. Kogta Financial operates in six states i.e Delhi, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh through 80 different branches. [3], serving more than 50,000 customers.[4] At the end of FY 2018-19, disbursal stood at Rs. 561.29 Crores, which was 40.18% more than our previous year’s disbursals. Total Assets under Management (AUM) stood at Rs. 711.24 Crores at the end of this fiscal, an increase of 65.98% over the previous year. [5] Corporate background[edit source] Kogta Financial (India) Ltd was incorporated on 15 January, 1996. It's a Non Banking Finance Company (NBFC) and is classified as 'company limited by shares'.[7] The company offers loan for the purchase of commercial vehicles, tractors and four-wheelers, and disburses loan against property and loans to micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs). [4]

Ketki R (talk) 12:29, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ketki R. Being reliable is a necessary requirement for sources, but is not sufficient for demonstrating notability. Sources must also be independent (not the company's website, or annual report, or press releases), and must contain significant coverage. Reports of capital raising activities ("raises Rs 154 crore", "leads funding round", "to raise up to ₹150 crore", etc.) are explicitly excluded as trivial coverage. Most businesses are not notable. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:12, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:30:08, 24 September 2019 review of draft by Hannermerkedian


Hannermerkedian (talk) 13:30, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have created a subject about a new web-series. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:I_Hear_You My first draft was rejected for not having external sources. My second draft was rejected for not having enough external sources. Can you help me understand why three separate news articles from reliable secondary sources are not enough?

Thank you.

 On hold pending paid editing disclosure, see User talk:Hannermerkedian#Declare any connection. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:21, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:02:20, 24 September 2019 review of submission by MisMurphy

I addressed the reasons sited for rejecting the first entry, and am hoping it can be reviewed again.

MisMurphy (talk) 14:02, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MisMurphy. The draft is in the pool to be reviewed. The current backlog stands at 5 months, so it is likely to be a while. See Wikipedia:Community portal for ways to improve Wikipedia while you wait. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:00, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:16:01, 24 September 2019 review of submission by Godfreychuks

I want my article to be reviewed,I believe is the best article i have ever done, and will put all my effort to contribute on Wikipedia pages.

Godfreychuks (talk) 16:16, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It has been reviewed and rejected you are not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia at this time. Theroadislong (talk) 16:19, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:13:46, 24 September 2019 review of submission by Mentalhealthmatterz


Mentalhealthmatterz (talk) 18:13, 24 September 2019 (UTC) non-promotional[reply]


21:26:17, 24 September 2019 review of submission by Charlieadguerilla


Charlieadguerilla (talk) 21:26, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Charlieadguerilla! I noticed that you did not specify a draft nor left a message. How may we assist you? Is this to do with User:Charlieadguerilla/sandbox? --TheSandDoctor Talk 16:00, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 25

06:36:27, 25 September 2019 review of submission by Chirag-Behre


Hello Team,

I have made some changes in the draft by adding some strong reliable source of the referenced articles. I request the team to kindly go through the attached draft and let me know if anything else is required.

Chirag-Behre (talk) 06:36, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chirag-Behre. Rejection is meant to be final, to convey that the topic is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). No amount of editing can fix that problem. There is no option to re-submit the draft because volunteers do not intend to review it again. You may wish to explore alternative outlets, with different inclusion criteria, for your writing. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:51, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06:52:49, 25 September 2019 review of submission by 27.60.163.180


Hello, the press coverage received are of notable references. Could you guide us on what are the benchmarks for notability?

27.60.163.180 (talk) 06:52, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@27.60.163.180: - hi there, for a company to be notable it needs to meet these criteria. The first source is just a very basic summary that doesn't cover the company in depth. The second source is about Grover, not the company, and is mainly quotes from various individuals so it's not neutral/independent. Almost all of your final source is quotes or indirect quotes by Wadhwani, with relatively little told about the company by a neutral party. You need multiple in-depth sources that are from reliable secondary sources and independent (which rules out most interviews). Nosebagbear (talk) 10:07, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:19:07, 25 September 2019 review of submission by Indigenus~enwiki

Hello, this is my second post on the Help Desk, hope it get answered this time. I was advised that the multiple references for the draft article do not meet the criteria for notability. This is quite confusing, as the following references are multiple, and apparently meet the defined criteria for significant coverage in independent, reliable and secondary sources. Please see below:

1. Coverage in BloombergQuint.com, a prominent financial news portal formed as partnership between Bloomberg and Quintillion media (reference: https://www.bloomberg.com/company/press/bloomberg-forms-new-partnership-with-quintillion-media-in-india/). Coverage link: https://www.bloombergquint.com/business/startup-street-this-startup-says-it-can-nearly-wipe-out-your-electricity-bill

2. Coverage in ETEnergyworld.com, a part of The Economic Times, India's largest English financial daily, that focuses on energy news. Coverage link: https://energy.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/renewable/we-will-achieve-rs-100-cr-annual-revenue-this-financial-year-pranesh-chaudhary-founder-zunroof/70024921

3. Coverage in The Hindu Businessline, a leading, highly-credible financial daily in India. Coverage link: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/specials/clean-tech/lighting-up-your-home-right-from-the-roof/article27198508.ece

4. Coverage in CNBC-TV18, a leading financial news channel (an India-specific venture of CNBC), link: https://www.cnbctv18.com/young-turks/young-turks-troubled-with-high-electricity-bills-heres-how-zunroof-can-solve-your-problems-3828671.htm

5. Coverage in Moneycontrol.com, a prominent financial and business news portal owned by Network 18, a leading media company of India. Link: https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/this-startups-solar-power-solutions-is-making-indian-homes-green-and-future-ready-3971841.html

I feel that Zunroof meets the criteria for notability - however I am happy to take feedback from other editors.

Indigenus~enwiki (talk) 11:19, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12:41:24, 25 September 2019 review of submission by Mari Wiki SB


Hello: I don't understand why my article was rejected. All of the content comes from the company's website, which is listed as an external link. Please tell me what I should be doing in order to get this article finally published! I am an agency representing this company (Jewish Museum of Basel).

Thanks!

Mari Wiki SB (talk) 12:41, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mari Wiki SB: First, post the mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mari Wiki SB. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mari Wiki SB|employer=agency name|client=Jewish Museum of Basel}}. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:59, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Mari Wiki SB: Thank you for placing the disclosure. You are supposed to replace the "agency name" bit in the template with the name of the agency you are working for, e.g. "Fitz & Co.", or whatever.
You've added citations to some independent sources, so you may resubmit the draft (there is now a big blue "Resubmit" button within the large pink box at the top of Draft:Jewish Musem of Switzerland). --Worldbruce (talk) 14:37, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12:56:29, 25 September 2019 review of submission by Manishsinghon


Manishsinghon (talk) 12:56, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


12:58:41, 25 September 2019 review of submission by Manishsinghon


Manishsinghon (talk) 12:58, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I have shared the links of reliable and noteworthy sources. Now I can believe the article can be published.

Request on 16:04:58, 25 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Yourepartofit


Originally I started work on record labels of New Jersey focusing first on Command Records and Mint 400 Records with plans for working on other labels. My draft was denied, this was my response:

I'm requesting assistance because I am joining Wikipedia to focus on record labels in Northern New Jersey because I lived there in the 1990's. Most of the labels I wanted to focus on have already in depth Wikipedia pages some of which I am still compiling information to add to. Two labels I wanted to focus on that had very little about them was the 60's label Command Records which I have added to and the record label Mint 400 Records which is currently one of the biggest record labels in North New Jersey. It was stated they don't have enough substantial resources about them or not reputable resources? I don't quite know how to substantiate that the label has been a staple of Northern NJ for over a decade with over 250 releases and about 100 bands signed. They seemed to have been written about by every major music writer in Northern NJ, so I'm not sure what Wikipedia needs in order to approve the page.

Other labels I would like to write about in this area include: Little Dickman Records, Rhyme & Reason Records, Pyrrhic Victory Recordings, Dromedary Records and Killing Horse Records. I'm not quite sure how to substantiate their existences either to write about them. They all exist and they are very well respected and well known in the North East USA. Is this something that just is not going to be able to be on Wikipedia?

This was then the response: References are either to unreliable sources, or only mention the subject in passing. Lacking the in-depth coverage required by corporation guidelines.

However, it seems that a bunch of notable New Jersey press members like Bob Makin, Jim Testa, Gary Wein, and others who had accredited press and their own pages were all removed from Wikipedia. It's as if someone purposely is deleting much of the people, writers, bands, musicians, and information which was on Wikipedia to use it as ammo to basically erase a subsection of that states music community. Also mentioned was that the label was only mentioned in passing, which I investigated and saw that most if not all labels were represented in the press this way, there tends not to be articles written on the label but the content they provide and it's effect. If that is that case then that is fine, but I noticed for other states that their music community is represented if it was notable in the same way. Can I get a definitive answer on if the topics are too small?

Yourepartofit (talk) 16:04, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


September 26

00:10:06, 26 September 2019 review of draft by Jconwiki


Jconwiki (talk) 00:10, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:50:19, 26 September 2019 review of submission by UMESH B N



UMESH B N (talk) 08:50, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:50:19, 26 September 2019 review of draft by UMESH B N

12:32:47, 26 September 2019 review of submission by Vincek19


Hello, I fully updated the draft and rewrote it at 100% as it was asked.

Vincek19 (talk) 12:32, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Request on 16:18:47, 26 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Rasa guru


Rohith Chakravarti Vemula

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Rohith+Chakravarti+Vemula&atb=v186-2&ia=web the topic is misdirected with no Biopage but an incident page only.

the draft was rejected: saying its not notable but it has lot of Importance in India and also on web. a google search would validate it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Rohith_Chakravarti_Vemula Hi there is a wikipage which is not fair to a persons life 1. By labeling to a incident in his life 2. not even having a photo 3. not covering other aspects of his life.We created one page which is like his biography page with a dignified name but it was declined by a reviewer without considering the content. the redirection with the name is unfair the new page need to be vlalid, How can i request another reviewer with information.

Fair eg 1: Name"JIAH KHAN" WikiPAge:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jiah_Khan

Fair eg2: Name:Robin Williams" Wikipage: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Williams

unfair eg.1 Name: "Rohith Vemula": notdignified Wikipage: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_of_Rohith_Vemula

Unfair eg.2 Name: (Payal Tadvi) : Undignified page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_of_Payal_Tadvi

Have created a more biographical page compared to an event(Suicide) page Right page:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Rohith_Vemula

this page needs to be critically reviewed not as a biography page :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_of_Rohith_Vemula and the redirect needs to be updated. kindly help us to reach to a clearthinking and unbiased reviewing.

Rasa guru (talk) 09:07, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

@Rasa guru: Examples 1 & 2 you mentioned were know not only for their suicidal deaths they were well established actors and had independent and reliable coverage for their body of work. On the other hand examples 3 & 4 are only know for their manner of death and I know it sounds a bit insensitive. FitIndia Talk Mail 11:23, 26 September 2019 (UTC) Yes, It sounds insensitive and also is further proof of the Insensitivity of Indian Society towards Human Dignity. To mark & label a human by their manner of death rather than see & recognize the humanity in the person. Well we can surely learn from the Global solidarity in showing compassion and empathize with the persons Holistically. The Resoning of rejection equating "well established" with fame in media, the two examples were well established as humans in their respective communities and the recognition they deserve as Humans First. by going with your logic maybe we should rename "Bhagat singh's Bio page" as "Hanging of Bhagath singh" or "Nathuram Godse" as the "Assassin Godse".. and many more pages need to be edited going by the Rejection logic given (Person to be known by the incident he is famous for later rather than a Bio page for the person)

I Searched on the format "Suicide of X" & "x" found multiple right instances of Wikipaging. Good examples are available of BETTER LOGICAL REVIEWING where they have separate pages as it should be ethically also.. 1.IncidentPage : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_of_Kurt_Cobain 2.BioPAge: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurt_Cobain

Another point of Highlighting the suicide and not focusing on the personality may lead to Copycat Suicides & Contagion there are research on it. U may refer the Docs below also i See u unfit to review this as an Indian, plz pass it on to a neutral unbiased Reviewer who knows the sensitiveness of Suicide and caste issues. https://www.openaccessgovernment.org/the-werther-effect/42915/

I request sensitive Reviewing, if ability to empathize is less in Indian reviewers, As a Global Netizen I am requesting not to reject but pass on to unbiased neutral Non-Indian Reviewers as a third party arbitrator out of the biased Indian systems, for the sake of Wikipedias ethical freedom of expression. This Page is rightful in its asserting compliance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Article 12, 10 & 8 https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/ and a reviewer needs to be aware and in aggreement/Sensitive to the UN Directives for being fit to review the Bio Pages of Suicide & Caste Discrimination Victims the world over, is there a EmpathicIndia or a HumaneWorld Reviewer plz pass the review to them??

Thank you, Rasa guru (talk) 13:11, 26 September 2019 (UTC) Rasa guru (talk) 16:18, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:43:00, 26 September 2019 review of submission by 41.215.173.78


41.215.173.78 (talk) 17:43, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


September 27

10:01:35, 27 September 2019 review of submission by Wendygorski

I am writing a biography about a person I call a renaissance man. So far, in his 63 year old life, he has been an radio astronomer, computer designer, software engineer[wrote WORKWRITER in the 80's], journalist and my partner in Newsbytes News Network, created a TV computer news weekly newscast [The Technology Channel in 1990], author[wrote the book GJ139], a flight tracking website creator[DXFlights], one of the best known travel websites on Greece[ellada.com], a nuclear inspector and now he produces independent movies in Hollywood[first movie was "The Dark Hand" and now "Infernum"].

It was rejected in March 2019 and then again in September by ClarityFriend with the comment: Far from Satisfing (!!).

My questions are: - Can I upload and use photos of magazine covers from the pre-internet era as proof? - Can I include mentions of pre-internet events relating to his life? - Many photos of his early life (thousands were taken on Mykonos, Greece) are on Facebook group archives by other people. Can these be included? I believe these photo archives are public. - Recently the first review from a critic called his latest film, Infernum (to be released December 10 in North America), "INFERNUM manages to evoke the immediacy of the best "found footage" films, with all the breathless suspense and creeping terror but without the awkward contrivances." Can this info be used in the biography? Thank you for providing guidance to be able to submit this biography. Wendy

Wendygorski (talk) 10:01, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wendygorski. Your misquotation of Clarityfiend's review suggests you may have misunderstood it. Their complete comment was: "Far from satisfying WP:BIO". Wikipedians use shorthand links like WP:BIO to link to policies and guidelines without having to repeat pages and pages of text. Also, the reviewer's comment should be read in the context of the formal reason the draft was declined, which is in the gray box within the larger pink box at the top of the draft. There are over forty links there to explanatory information, which can be daunting. Reviewers often use comments to emphasize a particular point, in this case that the draft's references fail to demonstrate that the topic is notable (suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia).
How far are the draft's references from satisfying the requirements? Novice Wikipedians are commonly advised to cite at least three sources that are independent, reliable, secondary sources that contain significant coverage of their topic.
  • Not independent: articles.adsabs.harvard.edu, Monthly Notes of the Astronomical Society of South Africa, Barnes & Noble, and cambridge.org
  • Not reliable: revolvy.com, sigidwiki.com, imdb.com, and hkfilmnews.blogspot.com
  • Not significant coverage: naic.edu, setileague.org, cpc-power.com, w3.org, aei.pitt.edu, arrl.org, ellada.com, and nawiliwiliyachtclub.org
Many are also primary sources instead of secondary ones. In sum, the draft sites zero suitable sources. You would need to throw all of them away.
You may not upload copies of magazine covers or Facebook photos taken by other people, they are copyrighted. Photos would be primary sources, so they would not help demonstrate notability. You may cite magazine articles, even if offline. But to demonstrate notability they would need to contain a substantial depth of information about Vekinis, not be written by Vekinis, and be in a publication with a reputation for accuracy and fact checking. The film review quote says nothing about Vekinis, so it doesn't help.
Creating a new article is one of the most difficult, time consuming, and frustrating tasks a new contributor can attempt. We try hard at AfC to be upbeat and encouraging, but the kindest thing in this case may be to tell you up front that the topic doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being published here. Pick a different topic (one with which you have no connection) or consider an alternative outlet with different inclusion criteria. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:08, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:39:19, 27 September 2019 review of submission by Mojapelo Neo


Mojapelo Neo (talk) 13:39, 27 September 2019 (UTC) why was my article declined[reply]

17:03:39, 27 September 2019 review of submission by Tippy115


Ashley Dennis 17:03, 27 September 2019 (UTC)


17:04:01, 27 September 2019 review of submission by Tippy115


Ashley Dennis 17:04, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

why???

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&oldid=918231831"