User talk:Tudor.raneti

Hello, Tudor.raneti, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 03:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me against vandals

My articles are being vandalized. I already caught two vandals: Biruitorul and Yilloslime, and reverted their vandalism, but I suspect they will keep coming at it. Their vandalism is obvious by the fact it's not only unmotivated deletion of content but impossible to justify

The articles targeted by these vandals are https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_Court_of_Romania and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judiciary_of_Romania

Since I'm a new wikipedia editor I need you to help me against vandals because I don't have the experience fending them of. I believe I should obtain protection of these articles since banning the vandals one by one won't help, they will just keep coming from other accounts or make new ones

Also because I exposed a huge criminal organization and its activity, I suspect vandals will keep coming against these articles from the criminal organization's ranks, as I have the experience of being obsessively censored before on various media, the same without any justification, which is why it's lacking here

Thank you

Stop reverting right now, please, or you will be blocked for edit warring. Drmies (talk) 00:43, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Where to start. Editors aren't "vandals" because they reverted you, nor are they part of a conspiracy or whatever because they disagree with you. Reverting Giraffedata on a matter they are an expert in is silly. The text you added to the two articles is argumentative, and Wikipedia is not a forum. Your edits lack secondary sourcing, meaning they are no encyclopedic because they are not properly verified with secondary sources. You are more than welcome to expose criminal organizations, but NOT on Wikipedia. Now, I strongly encourage you to read over guidelines and policies, linked above in the welcome template. If you continue to edit as you did before, your career here will be short, I'm afraid. Drmies (talk) 00:48, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Drmies, Biruitorul and Yilloslime for proven vandalism which by definition is deleting wikipedia content without a syllogistic justification. A proper and only logical argument motivation structure to contribute to wikipedia consists of a particular premise correlated with an universal premise such as a law or regulation, and a logical inference, in other words a syllogism, which is verifiable and true according to wikipedia regulations. Since deleting wikipedia content without justification is vandalism, the users doing it must be banned Tudor.raneti (talk) 01:05, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Sorry! I am not an administrator nor an expert on the topics to give a good opinion. Looks like you have been addressed above though. Red Director (talk) 01:16, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]