User contributions for Tudor.raneti

19 March 2019

• 02:3402:34, 19 March 2019 diff hist +1,482 User talk:Tudor.raneti →{{unblock | reason=Oshwah is an actual criminal ~~~~}}: new section
• 01:5301:53, 19 March 2019 diff hist +453 m User talk:Tudor.raneti Huon is also a liar, proved his lie and will mark him for malicious editing
• 01:4101:41, 19 March 2019 diff hist +2,573 Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism →Please block Drmies, Biruitorul and Yilloslime for obvious vandalism, and protect my articles. It's guaranteed there's more in their group: new section
• 01:2801:28, 19 March 2019 diff hist +52 m User talk:Tudor.raneti added a missing link to vandalism according to wikipedia
• 01:2701:27, 19 March 2019 diff hist +1,036 m User talk:Tudor.raneti demonstrated according to wikipedia rules, that the users Drmies, Biruitorul and Yilloslime are vandals, and Drmies also lies and threatens breaking wikipedia rules on purpose
• 01:1301:13, 19 March 2019 diff hist +1,258 User talk:Red Director →{{Help me}} against a group of vandals: new section
• 01:0501:05, 19 March 2019 diff hist +646 User talk:Tudor.raneti described how Drmies, Biruitorul and Yilloslime are vandals and must be banned. Will notify administration because clearly this is mobbing harassment and vandalism and it's out of hand
• 00:5900:59, 19 March 2019 diff hist +3,906 Judiciary of Romania Undid revision 888417772 by Drmies (talk) - vandalism, lying that my article is "POV writing" when it is scientific backed up by other scientific articles, logic and law. Also lies about edit warring when in fact only vandals who delete content without justification (a.k.a. reverting) are edit warring. This user must be banned Tag: Undo
• 00:5800:58, 19 March 2019 diff hist +54,613 Constitutional Court of Romania Undid revision 888417642 by Drmies (talk) - vandalism, lying that my article is "argumentative" when it is scientific backed up by other scientific articles, logic and law. Also lies about edit warring when in fact only vandals who delete content without justification (a.k.a. reverting) are edit warring. This user must be banned Tag: Undo
• 00:4300:43, 19 March 2019 diff hist −4 m User talk:Tudor.raneti removed doubled {{Help me}} which was unhelpful and broke the message in half
• 00:4100:41, 19 March 2019 diff hist +1,096 User talk:Tudor.raneti →{{Help me}} against vandals: new section
• 00:3200:32, 19 March 2019 diff hist +1,061 User talk:Yilloslime →Yilloslime committed vandalism by deleting a significant article update without any possible justification: new section
• 00:2600:26, 19 March 2019 diff hist +3,906 Judiciary of Romania Undid revision 888402808 by Yilloslime (talk) - Yilloslime committed vandalism by deleting a significant article update without any possible justification. Yilloslime is in cahoots with the previous marked vandals such as the previous vandal user "Biruitorul". This user must also be banned Tag: Undo
• 00:2600:26, 19 March 2019 diff hist +54,613 Constitutional Court of Romania Undid revision 888402749 by Yilloslime (talk) - Yilloslime committed vandalism by deleting a significant article update without any possible justification. Yilloslime is in cahoots with the previous marked vandals such as the previous vandal user "Biruitorul". This user must also be banned Tag: Undo

18 March 2019

• 22:0222:02, 18 March 2019 diff hist +3,906 Judiciary of Romania Undid revision 887999613 by Biruitorul (talk) "(Rmv soapboxing)" - vandalism. A proper and only logical argument motivation structure to contribute to wikipedia consists of a particular premise correlated with an universal premise such as a law, and a logical inference, in other words a syllogism, which is verifiable and true according to wikipedia regulations. Since user Biruitorul is clearly a wikipedia vandal, he must be banned Tag: Undo
• 21:5921:59, 18 March 2019 diff hist +54,613 Constitutional Court of Romania Undid revision 887999666 by Biruitorul (talk) "(Yeah, no)" - vandalism. A proper and only logical argument motivation structure to contribute to wikipedia consists of a particular premise correlated with an universal premise such as a law, and a logical inference, in other words a syllogism, which is verifiable and true according to wikipedia regulations. Since user Biruitorul is clearly a wikipedia vandal, he must be banned Tag: Undo
• 21:5321:53, 18 March 2019 diff hist +1,043 User talk:Biruitorul →Wikipedia user "Biruitorul" is a wikipedia vandal. Ban him!: new section

14 March 2019

• 13:3913:39, 14 March 2019 diff hist +3,907 Judiciary of Romania introduced the real activity of the Romanian judiciary system, intrinsically its present and immediate future and past status
• 12:1812:18, 14 March 2019 diff hist +1,145 m Constitutional Court of Romania →Complicity and instigation to Crimes against humanity: fixed errors, typos, expressions, added missing references, minor logic reinforcement, incorporated an instance of user Giraffedata's obsession with "consist" :) - cannot edit online multiple fixes for lack of resources as time, internet and pc, so I'm doing it in a txt file, then copy pasting the lot of fixes over where I may accidentally overwrite any other edits which I also incorporate in my txt if possible
• 11:0811:08, 14 March 2019 diff hist +2 m Constitutional Court of Romania Undid revision 887344065 by Giraffedata (talk) 1. comprised of exists in the dictionary meaning it is already correct, as well as adding information naturally as in "is comprised as proven..., inclusively by" which isn't in accord with consists 2. comprised of is used when followed by an enumeration, not just comprised, or consists - https://www.dictionary.com/browse/comprised, meaning I'm correct. 3. potential metadata marker edit Tag: Undo

11 March 2019

• 22:1222:12, 11 March 2019 diff hist +53,468 Constitutional Court of Romania introducing the real activity of the Constitutional Court of Romania