Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhutan Times

Bhutan Times

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable news organization. I cannot find any sources to prove its notability, and again, there's not any references except two external links. Ahmetlii (talk) 05:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Ahmetlii (talk) 05:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There are two links to news coverage on the page itself. Both unfortunately suffer from link rot, though, and I'm on mobile right now so I haven't fully digged around to see if they can be retrieved. Even without those, though, I've found two sources that together meet GNG: ~~an article on the launch from Reuters~~ and an International Federation of Journalists report on a mass resignation. The latter is negative coverage that needs to be included on the page for neutrality, but that's no reason to delete. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 13:50, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, the Reuters piece was on Bhutan Today, which is a different paper, and only mentioned the Bhutan Times in passing. Here's a piece from United Press International which should work instead. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 17:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Plenty of sources can be found simply by clicking on the word "books" above. One example among many is the extensive coverage in The Dragon's Voice: How Modern Media Found Bhutan by Bunty Avieson, published by the University of Queensland Press. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]