Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhutan Times

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 08:20, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bhutan Times

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable news organization. I cannot find any sources to prove its notability, and again, there's not any references except two external links. Ahmetlii (talk) 05:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Ahmetlii (talk) 05:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There are two links to news coverage on the page itself. Both unfortunately suffer from link rot, though, and I'm on mobile right now so I haven't fully digged around to see if they can be retrieved. Even without those, though, I've found two sources that together meet GNG: ~~an article on the launch from Reuters~~ and an International Federation of Journalists report on a mass resignation. The latter is negative coverage that needs to be included on the page for neutrality, but that's no reason to delete. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 13:50, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, the Reuters piece was on Bhutan Today, which is a different paper, and only mentioned the Bhutan Times in passing. Here's a piece from United Press International which should work instead. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 17:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Plenty of sources can be found simply by clicking on the word "books" above. One example among many is the extensive coverage in The Dragon's Voice: How Modern Media Found Bhutan by Bunty Avieson, published by the University of Queensland Press. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.