User talk:Ttonyb1

---

OffshoreSoluciones‎

why aren´t you interested in free speech? and why do you want to censure the researchs in argentinian economy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrucho (talk • contribs)

This is not a matter of "Free Speech". This is simple a matter that the article fails to meet the criteria for inclusion into Wikipedia. In the case of Companies, the criteria is defined in WP:GNG and WP:COMPANY. OffshoreSoluciones‎ fails to show its Wikipedia based notability by meeting the criteria using reliable sources. Take a look at the criteria in the articles I have referenced and those referenced in the Welcome message in your talk page and let me know if you have any questions. Happy New Year! ttonyb (talk) 05:05, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Well i wanna know how is it that you know that its not an important company? maybe you lve in argentina?

before maqking a statement like that you should really do some investigation and check out how the econmy works in some countrys — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrucho (talk • contribs) 05:12, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Or is it that you work for the goverment and you dont want new ideas out there on the web? are you scared about what they will say in there new book? is that it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrucho (talk • contribs) 05:16, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

I heard a wonderful quote today, "It is possible to disagree with someone without being disagreeable." I suggest you memorize the quote. What makes you so sure I did not research the company or have little knowledge of Argentina? As I indicated above, all articles must meet certain criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia. That criteria is based on Wikipedia based notability. I also suggest you read WP:CIVIL, it is one of the pillars of Wikipedia contributions. My best to you. ttonyb (talk) 05:21, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

si tanto sabes de argentina vas a entender el español. por que no venis a vivir aca?

please explain and describe where you´ve got the information to afirm the lack of notability. if you tell me this, and you convince me i will delete myself this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrucho (talk • contribs) 05:25, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Many people speak Spanish throughout the world and are multilingual. I have many German friends that speak Spanish better than I. Regardless, I digress. It is not up to me to prove the article meets the criteria I listed above. You, as the author, have the burden of proof. The article is not notable for one reason and one reason alone, specifically, the article fails to meet the criteria in WP:COMPANY using reliable sources. I am not sure how I can be more specific than that. ttonyb (talk) 05:31, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi well i see that you didnt not even take the time to see that the external link n1 is the Subsecretaría de comercio exterio maybe thats not a reliable sources if its not the Trade Unterstaatssekretariat Äußere Deutschland... if it figured there maybe you woudl not have a problem with it.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrucho (talk • contribs) 05:42, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Again, I suggest you not assume anything. Both were read; however, if you reviewed WP:RS as I asked above you would have seen they do not meet the criteria to support the article. ttonyb (talk) 05:46, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

well then i think that and argentinan goverment source is good for what it asks as -reliable, published sources- But as its also posted The reliability of a source depends on context maybe for you and argentinan official goverment page is not a source that is valid. Maybe if this company figured in the Unterstaatssekretariat für Außenhandel in Deutschland then it would be considered a valid source and there reasearch was about the USA or Germany then we would not be having this conversation... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrucho (talk • contribs) 05:59, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

My best to you. ttonyb (talk) 06:01, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Dr. Kohl

I protected against re-creation. DGG ( talk ) 18:02, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks... ttonyb (talk) 19:03, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

David Tharckabaw

David Tharckabaw is one of the most important enemies of the military regime in Burma. He has created a alianse of more than seven hill tribes. He had get money for the war.

My Article

Hello, I'd like it to be noted that my article was not a duplication of Bodybuilding , but rather an outline of the subject. Is there any way my work can be restored? (See WP:OOK) Thanks, Tarheel95 (talk) 14:33, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Miguel Roman

Hi Tony. In the light of further developments of the article and the addition of significant sources, could you consider self-declining your CSD? You can always PROD or AfD it if you still feel the rticle does not meet our criteria, but it is no longer a CSD. Cheers, --Kudpung (talk) 03:09, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Warning tags query

Hi there. With regard to this, I agree that it's an annoying editor, but I thought that non-IP editors were allowed to edit their own Talk pages, the logic being that removing the warning is in effect an acknowledgement that they've seen it? Best wishes DBaK (talk) 18:35, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

You could very well be right. I am not sure, but I change to follow that premise. Thanks for pointing this out and my best to you. ttonyb (talk) 18:39, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! I could also very well be wrong ... but I did have a vague feeling that there was something along those lines. If I was a proper Wikiperson I suppose I could go and look it up ... Have a very good Saturday, best wishes, DBaK (talk) 18:50, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Bruno Osimo stub

Could you please explain your message? I didn't rollback any of your actions...I understand there is an issue with this article but I didn't remove your tags. --Adumoul (talk) 05:36, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

See [1]. It appears you removed my tag edits. ttonyb (talk) 05:38, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

hi, i just created the lucas abbott page and it's up for speedy termination. i apologize, i have no idea what i'm doing here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whorah (talk • contribs) 06:07, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

reference

can you please explain how i can add a reference so i don't get my page terminated?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whorah (talk • contribs) 06:12, 9 January 2011 (UTC) 

Bruno Osimo stub

Hello Ttonyb1

This author, Bruno Osimo, has written the most translated translation course in the world, his influence and notoriety are not contested at least in Europe and here are some of his books:

Manuale del traduttore guida pratica con glossario. Published 1998 by Ulrico Hoepli Editore in Milano . Written in Italian. ID Numbers Open Library OL18626532M ISBN 10 882032590X

Logos Translation course ( Translated in 10 languages) http://courses.logos.it/index_it.html

Dizionario affettivo della lingua ebraica (Gli alianti) http://www.amazon.it/Dizionario-affettivo-lingua-ebraica-alianti/dp/887168558X

Bruno Osimo - Storia della traduzione http://www.izideal.it/p8682485/bruno-osimo-storia-della-traduzione/

I don't understand why a very small article about a notable scholar in Translation science should be eliminated in English when wikipedia admits is in other languages.

I am a University Teacher, in South America, and my motivation to contribute here to this modest article is just a peer-recognition of the quality of the work of Mr. Osimo. Other notable professional of the field can also intervene in favour of this article, which need to be improved but not deleted.

--Comptrad (talk) 12:40, 9 January 2011 (UTC)--Comptrad (talk) 12:47, 9 January 2011 (UTC)