Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nsmutte

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MrSchimpf (talk | contribs) at 04:47, 21 February 2017. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Nsmutte

Nsmutte (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nsmutte/Archive.

A long-term abuse case exists at Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Nsmutte.



15 February 2017

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets


S nominated Bonadea's user page for deletion and B shows up to vote. Standard trolling by this O/C person. These accounts often come in waves so a C/U is requested to sniff out any others MarnetteD|Talk 02:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


15 February 2017

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

Tag-team deletion dickery at Adair Park Historic District and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adair Park Historic District. Same bad spelling and idiosyncatic template use, but as creating their own article to nominate is a new tactic, I'm getting a second opinion. BethNaught (talk) 14:55, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have nothing of value to add to this but I am still laughing at this: Tag-team deletion dickery. This might be the best description of Nsmutte's vandalism yet. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Adding Skytop333 due to their abuse filter hit which is in the usual Nsmutte layout. BethNaught (talk) 00:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Added Kaajupakoda (talk · contribs). 172.56.38.78 (talk) 03:59, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Added Jumritha (talk · contribs). 172.56.38.78 (talk) 04:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Added Sdfghjrdfgt (talk · contribs). 172.56.38.78 (talk) 04:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
+Bagunnayi. BethNaught (talk) 08:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
+Nuvvuedianna because of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Norris (footballer)]. BethNaught (talk) 13:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Any bets that Bowser0000 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) is not another one? Created a copy of an existing article and immediately took it to AfD. --bonadea contributions talk 17:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


17 February 2017

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets


Still more anti-Bonadea deletion dickitude (and WP:DUCKitude) at Sigurveig Jónsdóttir. --Finngall talk 03:56, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Yup, was just about to add Elaayinaparledu (talk · contribs) myself... 172.58.41.33 (talk) 04:28, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I reported the two accounts to WP:AIV and Oshwah nuked them... 172.58.41.33 (talk) 05:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


19 February 2017

– An SPI clerk has endorsed a request for CheckUser. A checkuser will shortly review the case.

Suspected sockpuppets

Fits pattern of AfD disruption, but no quacking as of yet. BethNaught (talk) 12:45, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

@Favonian and BethNaught: I found and added another little duckling... (User:StadiumCCC). 172.58.41.56 (talk) 03:22, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Materialscientist has now blocked them. 172.58.41.56 (talk) 03:40, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


21 February 2017

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets


Did a drive-by AfD for Hypnosis and speedy-closed it as frivolous, then I reported them to AIV; as they were blocked based on that this is reference-only, but they have all the signs of this editor's history. Nate • (chatter) 04:47, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Nsmutte&oldid=766614827"