Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hypnosis
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep Drive-by WP:BADFAITH nom that has zero chance of deletion. (non-admin closure) Nate • (chatter) 01:58, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hypnosis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article clearly qualifies for reasons 6 & 7 on the deletion policy - it's a biased, poorly written piece of pseudoscientific propaganda, not fit for an unbiased encylopedia. Oldemane (talk) 01:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.