Talk:Voivodeship of Serbia and Banat of Temeschwar

Name

Article name is problematic from a common-name perspective. English-language results:

• Serbian Voivodship and Banat of Temesvar
  • Károly Kocsis; Eszter Kocsisné Hódosi (1995). Hungarian minorities in the Carpathian Basin: a study in ethnic geography. Matthias Corvinus Pub. ISBN 978-1-882785-04-9.
• Serbian Voivodship
  • Enikő A. Sajti (2003). Hungarians in the Voivodina, 1918-1947. Social Science Monographs. ISBN 978-0-88033-522-5.
  • Acta historica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. Magyar Tudományos Akadémia. 1954.
  • Magyar egyháztörténeti vázlatok. Magyar Egyháztörténeti Enciklopédia Munkaközössége. 2003.
• Serbian Voivodeship
  • János Varga (1993). A Hungarian Quo Vadis: Political Trends and Theories of the Early 1840s. Akadémiai Kiadó. ISBN 978-963-05-6493-9.
  • Ernst Flachbarth (1944). A History of Hungary's Nationalities. Society of the Hungarian Quarterly.
  • Ignác Romsics; B?la K. Kir?ly (1999). Geopolitics in the Danube Region: Hungarian Reconciliation Efforts, 1848-1998. Central European University Press. pp. 412–. ISBN 978-963-9116-28-3.
  • István Hajnal (1954). Studia historica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. Academia Scientiarum Hungarica.
  • Magyar statisztikai közlemények. Az Országos Magyar Kir. Statisztikai Hivatal. 1895.
• Voivodship of Serbia and Temes Banat
  • Jürgen Barkhoff; Helmut Eberhart (2009). Networking Across Borders and Frontiers: Demarcation and Connectedness in European Culture and Society. Peter Lang. pp. 121–. ISBN 978-3-631-59003-4.
• Voivodship of Serbia and Tamiš Banat
  • Anna Novakov (2012). Diplomatic Ties. Lulu.com. pp. 25–. ISBN 978-1-105-57721-5.
  • Vasile Boari; Sergiu Gherghina (27 May 2009). Weighting Differences: Romanian Identity in the Wider European Context. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. pp. 117–. ISBN 978-1-4438-1215-3.
• Voivodeship of Serbia and Banat of Temeschwar
  • James Lyon (30 July 2015). Serbia and the Balkan Front, 1914: The Outbreak of the Great War. Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 62–. ISBN 978-1-4725-8005-4.
  • Joshua Parker; Ralph J. Poole (2014). Austria and America: Cross-Cultural Encounters 1865-1933. LIT Verlag Münster. pp. 30–. ISBN 978-3-643-90576-5.

Any thoughts?--Zoupan 03:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Voivodeship of Serbia and Banat of Temeschwar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100826111453/http://www.sluzba.vojvodina.gov.rs/SEKRETARIJATI-V/MANJINE/manjine-koliko-se-poznajemo/web-tekst/Brosura-ceo-tekst.htm to http://www.sluzba.vojvodina.gov.rs/SEKRETARIJATI-V/MANJINE/manjine-koliko-se-poznajemo/web-tekst/Brosura-ceo-tekst.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:08, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Merge

The article Serbian Vojvodina covers the immediate predecessor of this polity; it was a short-lived (15 months) self-proclaimed autonomy, which was later formally granted in the form of this Voivodeship. Since both articles are relatively short, some parts are duplicated (heck, they even had the same flag) and polity histories gracefully blend into one another, I propose that we merge them into one. This would also solve navigation problems, e.g. Serbian Voivodeship is now a dab page between these two articles, but it's essentially the same province. The ultimate name of the article may be changed in the processs; I see Zoupan had reservations, above, but that's not an immediate concern of mine. No such user (talk) 10:25, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

The territory provinces are different (see both maps provinces; It's not like Serbia and Montenegro and FR Yugoslavia, their territory was the same), "Voivodeship of Serbia and Banat of Temeschwar" included today's part of the Romanian (and Hungarian ?) Banat - city Temeschwar..."Serbian Vojvodina" is included today's part of the Hungarian (and Croatian ?) Baranja --SrpskiAnonimac (talk) 11:47, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

• Two different subject, no basis for the merge. Sorabino (talk) 06:34, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Closing proposal, given the uncontested opposition. Klbrain (talk) 16:54, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Resolved

Ilok

If I am reading it correctly (map and article) town of Ilok was a part of the Neusatz District at the time and the district was itself a part of the Voivodeship? It would therefore be correct to include Croatia into the infobox section "today part of"?MirkoS18 (talk) 08:19, 7 July 2019 (UTC)