Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Streamup (2nd nomination)

Streamup

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Streamup
• Articles for deletion/Streamup (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Streamup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Permastub showing no evidence of notability. Sole reference is a blog. The previous AFD was withdrawn on the basis of this Variety article, which is a single passing mention and definitely not sufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH; a WP:BEFORE shows only press releases. Would need solid RS coverage to demonstrate WP:CORPDEPTH to keep. David Gerard (talk) 19:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 19:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 19:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 19:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 19:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete: No evidence of notability, and that passing mention is certainly not enough. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:00, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete: Obscure website seeking publicity via Wikipedia. Ode+Joy (talk) 22:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
• Delete: The only in-depth source I could find was this Mashable article. It's a pretty low-quality source and WP:MULTSOURCES are required to satisfy WP:ORG. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 09:16, 7 October 2021 (UTC)