Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Charlier
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Anna Charlier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Her fiancé is notable; she isn't. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 06:16, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 06:16, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Strong keep. I'd argue Anna Chartier is as notable as her fiancé. In addition to the sources in the article, several books write about her more than in passing: she is pretty central to Bea Uusma's The Expedition: A Love Story (Expeditionen: Min kärlekshistoria), which won the August Prize in the non-fiction category, the major award in the Swedish publishing industry, and Uusma spends significant time on her not just during the North Pole expedition, but also after. sv:Per Rydén also talks about her in Söndag : näst sista försöket. sv:Grenna museum had a Anna Chartier exhibition in 2016. sv:Land (tidskrift), among other publications, have had articles focused solely on Anna Chartier (article from Petter Karlsson, in issue 8 2020, p. 28–30). She easily passes WP:GNG. /Julle (talk) 20:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - I'm finding enough hits on Google Books to determine that she meets WP:GNG[1]. The article needs proper sourcing to reflect this, but that's not a reason for deletion. Netherzone (talk) 23:14, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Your search turns up Annas and Charliers, but nothing significant about Anna Charlier. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC)