Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Charlier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 23:13, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Charlier

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Her fiancé is notable; she isn't. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 06:16, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 06:16, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. I'd argue Anna Chartier is as notable as her fiancé. In addition to the sources in the article, several books write about her more than in passing: she is pretty central to Bea Uusma's The Expedition: A Love Story (Expeditionen: Min kärlekshistoria), which won the August Prize in the non-fiction category, the major award in the Swedish publishing industry, and Uusma spends significant time on her not just during the North Pole expedition, but also after. sv:Per Rydén also talks about her in Söndag : näst sista försöket. sv:Grenna museum had a Anna Chartier exhibition in 2016. sv:Land (tidskrift), among other publications, have had articles focused solely on Anna Chartier (article from Petter Karlsson, in issue 8 2020, p. 28–30). She easily passes WP:GNG. /Julle (talk) 20:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I'm finding enough hits on Google Books to determine that she meets WP:GNG [1]. The article needs proper sourcing to reflect this, but that's not a reason for deletion. Netherzone (talk) 23:14, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your search turns up Annas and Charliers, but nothing significant about Anna Charlier. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clarityfiend: I don't know if you're seeing the same results as I am, but I just get specifically for Anna Charlier, some of them not significant, but also including things I've mentioned above, where there's significant treatment of Charlier if you've got access to the entire book. /Julle (talk) 14:01, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Clarityfiend that is interesting, because I'm seeing something very different. Try searching on Google books with "Anna Chartier" in quotes, as I'm getting hits for the following books that do include her: Perfect North; The Expedition: Solving the Mystery of a Polar Tragedy; Strindberg's Star; Nordic Literature: A Comparative History. Volume I: Spatial Nodes · Volume 1; The Ice Balloon: S. A. Andree and the Heroic Age of Arctic Exploration; Falling Upwards: How We Took to the Air; Extreme: Why some people thrive at the limits; Anderson’s Travel Companion: A Guide to the Best Non-Fiction; The Oddest Place on Earth: Rediscovering the North Pole; Scandinavians: In Search of the Soul of the North; Flying's Strangest Moments: Extraordinary But True Stories; and many others, making her a clear WP:GNG pass. Netherzone (talk) 14:54, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.