Talk:The Finders (movement)
Appearance
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of The Finders (movement) be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in Washington, D.C. may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
A lot more citations are available
There is considerably more sources available than the two currently cited in the article.
Peaceray (talk) 14:20, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Potential Bias
With how this article is worded I have serious doubts about the authors intentions with this article, and possible bias. Put simply it doesn't read like an unbiased article attempting to report facts, in fact many details available in the FBI link are left out. It appears that the author wrote this article with the intention of trying to dismiss the topic and shut down any debate over the group and their actions
--2001:8003:8888:4E00:D4F6:E60D:45D3:3F46 (talk) 11:02, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- We go woth what RS say, do you have an wp:rs that contadict what we say?Slatersteven (talk) 11:04, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Wow. I am honestly shocked that there is a complete coverage blackout, there is not a single wp:rs source that discussed these documents we can all read online on the FBI's official website. This really calls into question the reliability of every single one of these sources. 2600:6C50:757F:F4FE:D9F5:62D6:3F54:5A00 (talk) 15:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- Or maybe they looked at them and found nothing of relevance. You would need to ask the media about this, there is no point talking about it here.Slatersteven (talk) 15:57, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- Wow. I am honestly shocked that there is a complete coverage blackout, there is not a single wp:rs source that discussed these documents we can all read online on the FBI's official website. This really calls into question the reliability of every single one of these sources. 2600:6C50:757F:F4FE:D9F5:62D6:3F54:5A00 (talk) 15:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- Low-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class ethics articles
- Low-importance ethics articles
- Ethics task force articles
- Start-Class sociology articles
- Low-importance sociology articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class District of Columbia articles
- Low-importance District of Columbia articles
- WikiProject District of Columbia articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class organization articles
- Low-importance organization articles
- WikiProject Organizations articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in Washington, D.C.