Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darshan (2004 film)
Appearance
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Darshan (2004 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
NN film UtherSRG (talk) 10:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. UtherSRG (talk) 10:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. There are not many sources covering Kannada films of the early 2000s as shown by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annavru (2003 film) (which was nominated for deletion by me). Regarding the broken Deccan Herald review link, remember per Wikipedia:V,
Do not reject reliable sources just because they are difficult or costly to access. Some reliable sources are not easily accessible
. Most sources presented are coverage of the film, not passing mentions. @Kataariveera:@Kailash29792: Please share your opinion. DareshMohan (talk) 22:33, 17 April 2023 (UTC)- Please see WP:TOI. The Times of India is not regarded as a WP:RS. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:34, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Its not that clear cut, it is between no consensus and unreliable and during the RSN discussion it was not refuted that non-controversial content such as film reviews were still acceptable, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: It could benefit from just a few more sources added. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:23, 18 April 2023 (UTC)