Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anatomy

WikiProject Anatomy Talk Page
Main page	Discussion	Things To Do	Tools	Article alerts	Manual of Style	Resources

Shortcut

WT:ANAT

WikiProject Anatomy was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 3 September 2014.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Chorda tympani

Hi all, I'm new here, but excited to help! I know that chorda tympani was low on the priority list, but I was reading it today as a reference and found it difficult to follow. I overhauled the introduction and structure section. I also added sources. Do you all think there are enough sources to remove from the need citation list? Any and all feedback welcome. Anatomary (talk) 00:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Subsartorial artery

A discussion about this term is located at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#Use_of_subsartorial_artery/vein. Mikael Häggström (talk) 19:41, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The use of 'subsartorial vein' as an alternative for femoral vein is also raised on above link.--Iztwoz (talk) 14:43, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting discussion for Clitoris

An article that you have edited or that may interest you, (Clitoris), has content that I have proposed to be removed and moved to another article, (Human clitoris). If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 05:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Project-independent quality assessments

Quality assessments are used by Wikipedia editors to rate the quality of articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project decides to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:55, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a great change, hopefully will reduce a lot of duplicated effort. I'd support inheriting a rating; our current classification is pretty up to date but I don't see a reason for us to pursue an independent quality assessment scale with our limited resources. Tom (LT) (talk) 06:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Muscle tissue#Requested move 19 April 2023

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Muscle tissue#Requested move 19 April 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – Material Works 21:01, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]