Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anatomy

WikiProject Anatomy Talk Page
Main page	Discussion	Things To Do	Tools	Article alerts	Manual of Style	Resources

Shortcut

WT:ANAT

WikiProject Anatomy was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 3 September 2014.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Splitting discussion for Clitoris

An article that you have edited or that may interest you, (Clitoris), has content that I have proposed to be removed and moved to another article, (Human clitoris). If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 05:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Project-independent quality assessments

Quality assessments are used by Wikipedia editors to rate the quality of articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project decides to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:55, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a great change, hopefully will reduce a lot of duplicated effort. I'd support inheriting a rating; our current classification is pretty up to date but I don't see a reason for us to pursue an independent quality assessment scale with our limited resources. Tom (LT) (talk) 06:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Muscle tissue#Requested move 19 April 2023

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Muscle tissue#Requested move 19 April 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – Material Works 21:01, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Kidney#Requested move 3 July 2023

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Kidney#Requested move 3 July 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 21:34, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bad photos

I and @Claes Lindhardt have been working on the List of skeletal muscles of the human body and it has become clear that several of the muscles have "reused" images or are just scans of Gray's Anatomy 20th edition that do not really explain what the muscle is. For example, just for the head muscles:

Orbicularis oculi muscle - does not show parts
Depressor supercilii muscle - just reuses obicularis oculi image
Temporoparietalis muscle - image but muscle is not even labeled
Levator labii superioris alaeque nasi muscle - labelled under a different name and the arrow is not even pointing at the right muscle
Transverse muscle of the chin - identical pictures to Depressor anguli oris muscle
Thyroarytenoid muscle - doesn't label parts

I'm not really an illustrator, so what is the best way to go about fixing these? Mathnerd314159 (talk) 15:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Articularis genus muscle - ist a picture of a bone with the muscle attachment rather then the muscle itself

Claes Lindhardt (talk) 21:54, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]