User talk:Parnaval

Welcome!

Hi Parnaval! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Fiddle Faddle 12:12, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noticing and welcoming me. I will learn the syntax in a few days. Parnaval (talk) 09:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent: Parnaval (talk) 09:47, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Parnaval, start slow and gentle. It can take a while to get into the swing of things. Fiddle Faddle 10:08, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Parnaval! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Edit struck off, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I am glad to become your wikifriend

Jenifree wants to be your friend! Friends promote WikiLove and make people happy. This user wants to be your friend because they like you. You can contact me at my talk page. Oh, and hopefully you will be my friend too!

Become someones friend! Add {{subst:Friend}} to their talk page.

Jenifree 05:57, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tejashri Pradhan

Ignore the contribution I made on that page, sir... You can delete what I have contributed to that page PA12194 (talk) 09:25, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page -- Parnaval (talk) 05:54, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why you have removed the edit in Siddharth Nigam Wikipedia page?

Hello, I know that it was a blog page that you Removed as citation . But in real he is a member of International Human Rights PROTECTION council. And the blog page that I have added in that Siddharth Nigam's photo holding that award was present. So please add that edit back. Kishmish Hu Main Ok (talk) 05:51, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kishmish Hu Main Ok: I have re-added that in media section. It should not be in the lead and do NOT add blog as source. -- Parnaval (talk) 06:42, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Thank You Kishmish Hu Main Ok (talk) 08:24, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wanted you to check a few sources.

Hello! I wanted you to check these few sources [1] [2] [3] [4] and let me know that whether I could add them to Avneet Kaur's wikipedia page - media section. Kindly do tell me which ones from these 4 I could add which ones I can't (if any). Thank you. Manalijain (talk) 12:47, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Manalijain: Sorry for late reply. Let me tell you one thing. A source is generally considered reliable if it does NOT publish fake news. A source is secondary if it has no relation with article subject. Above sources are independent and may be do not publish fake news. BUT . . . are these awards notable. Imagine if you start your own website and publish true news and give awards of your own. Example Most fiery Raven award ;) goes to Avneet. Then should we include that too in Wikipedia ??? . NO, of course . Why? Because your site is NOT reputable and award you gave is minor. Same is valid for above sites and awards
Remember, If a news is significant enough to be included in Wikipedia the it will be published by media house like Hindutan times, tribune etc. also along with IWMbuzz. so cite that news from Hindustan times.
But, if a news is available only in IWMbuzz / indiaforums and not in reliable sources mentioned at WP:ICTFSOURCES, then that news most probably doesn't qualify for inclusion, per WP:NOT.
Pinging Ravensfire so they could verify whether I have explained above things correctly. -- Parnaval (talk) 11:43, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Parnaval Okay, thanks for the brief explanation, I understood. Also, since you hadn't replied earlier so I had asked @Ravensfire: about the same and they have already made their side of explanation done.

Also, regarding your point that whether these mentioned awards are notable or not, then I would state that though they don't have any wikipedia article on them and can't be considered notable and hence these awards do stay minor but are completely true.

So, just wanted to clarify regarding this and the reason I posted these sources here on your talk-page was to have your opinion on them so I could improve with my editing and research. And yes, next time I will try finding more accurate sources and sites which probably qualify for inclusion on Wikiepdia. Thank you! Manalijain (talk) 12:05, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please add a new picture

Hello @Parnaval I have Added two pictures of Siddharth Nigam in the info box you removed one because it's not looking that good and you removed one because of copyright. So please add a picture of SIDDHARTH NIGAM between 2019 to present because the picture that you have added In the info box is too old ( of 2017) he was a teenager at that time. So please add new picture of his in info box Kishmish Hu Main Ok (talk) 14:17, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kishmish Hu Main Ok: What is this behaviour ! The image that existed earlier in infobox was from 2016, you didn't had any problem. But now when I replaced it with 2017, you want more recent! Images copyrighted by others can not be used, which is the case in all the sites you mentioned above. If I find a more recent non copyrighted image then I will add it but please, you should NOT add copyrighted images. -- Parnaval (talk) 06:33, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok , that was too old that's why I SAID why are you being rude!! Kishmish Hu Main Ok (talk) 06:35, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being rude, just confused how 2016 is not old and 2017 is old. -- Parnaval (talk) 10:42, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rashmika Mandanna as national crush.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rashmika Mandanna as national crush.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Suhani Shah

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Suhani Shah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suhani Shah. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DefenderBoy27 (talk) 02:09, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hey! I removed that section from my talk page and forgot to reply your comment there. Just came here as I wanted to thank you for your help and cooperation :) ManaliJain (talk) 16:10, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ManaliJain: You're welcome :) We should always keep helping each other so that trolls like that IP stay away from wikipedia. -- Parnaval (talk) 06:15, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First edit day

Hey Sdkb, I just logged in after so many months. Thank you so much for wishing. -- Parnaval (talk) 06:47, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft AK138 (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:NEWSORGINDIA as most of these references fall under that category. For reviewers, note that the main page and even the draft page are blocked from creation due to being created by SOCKS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Parnaval/Draft AK138 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 18:51, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Parnaval! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 18:51, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]