Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suhani Shah
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 17:22, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- Suhani Shah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. The two possible notabilities are a magician, b or author. As magician, the award does not sem to be major; as author, there is no evidence for importance of the book. There is no evidence except her own assertions that she significant in the other claimed fields. The refs to be found in Google News, tho some are from what passes as major papers, are either notices of barely-disguised press releases. DGG ( talk ) 18:11, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails general notability guidelines, WP:NAUTHOR and WP:ENT. The article is overly promotional and makes unreferenced claims which if removed would leave very little material for an article. JbhTalk 23:26, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 00:56, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 00:56, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.