User talk:YumaIOT

Welcome!

Hello, YumaIOT, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:SEICA (company), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! VViking_TalkEdits 13:27, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:SEICA (company)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:SEICA (company), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. VViking_TalkEdits 13:27, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:SEICA (company)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:SEICA (company), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. VViking_TalkEdits 16:05, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.--VViking_TalkEdits 16:18, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the clarification, please do not delete the page that i am working on, I will take some days to prepare it for submission and I absolutely need the time to perform all changes. As previously mentioned in a previous "contest of nomination" I stated that I am doing a research in industrial electronics and I am setting up the page for SEICA (company) exactly like the existing SPEA (company) page. For technical reasons, both pages have in their corporate sites the main sources. Please keep it untouched and, please, remember that the SPEA (company) page is online from many years on Wikipedia, I do not want to violate any Wiki policy and I just want to create a page that could be very useful for automatic test equipment (ATE) users. Thank you in advance and regards YumaIOT (talk) 16:23, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. -- Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:30, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Your edit to Draft:SEICA (company) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Too much content was copied, or closely paraphrased from, the source. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:31, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! YumaIOT, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 17:11, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SEICA (company) (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SEICA (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 10:35, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SEICA (company) (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SEICA (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 12:27, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SEICA (company) (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SEICA (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 12:36, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation, maybe I made some mistake in formatting the references, because I am reporting exactly the same references that I am using in my university research about ATE in Electronics and Lighting. Will correct and resubmit, of course, or you prefer to give me other hints before resubmission? For the article, I took inspiration from the existing SPEA (company) page (by the way: SPEA and SEICA are the top european competitors in ATE manufacturing, so that for completeness WP must contain both of them (or none of them)). Please forgive me if I misunderstood. KR, YumaIOT YumaIOT (talk) 12:42, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SEICA (company) (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SEICA (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 12:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Let me check, will fix immediately. Thanks again! YumaIOT (talk) 13:10, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SEICA (company) (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SEICA (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 13:33, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Dear McMatter, may I ask you to better explain why you think that the cited sources are not reliable? Just for comparison, because I am looking to the SPEA (company) as a reference, may you explain how the SPEA (company)'s sources are qualified so that I can take inspiration from them? It's just to better understand and to get an example in the same SEICA's category (Automatic Test Equipment). Thanks in advance, KR, Yuma YumaIOT (talk) 14:17, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SEICA (company) (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:SEICA (company) may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:51, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Dear Significa liberdade, may you explain me why and where you think the submission appears to be taken from https://www.seica.com/about-us/ ? Please specify thanks, I put a very deep attention to not copy any significant paragraph, so that let me know what you mean and what I have to do to fix this sad situation, thanks in advance and regards. YumaIOT. YumaIOT (talk) 13:24, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SEICA (company) (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SEICA (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 01:57, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SEICA (company) (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SEICA (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 13:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

Hello YumaIOT. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:SEICA (company), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:YumaIOT. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=YumaIOT|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:45, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi DoubleGrazing, if you read my previous comments, I am an independent electronic researcher preparing a PH Thesis on ATEs.

In my thesis I am referring to the top world ate players that are Teradyne, Spea and Seica, and in this context i am making the SEICA page because it is strangely missing on Wikipedia, while the other two (Teradyne and SPEA) are on wiki and the SPEA article has no reference (please check if you think that I am wrong). Hope having definitely clarified, thanks and regards. PS: it would be nice being payed for making an article, but unfortunately it is not my situation ;-) YumaIOT (talk) 07:41, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SEICA (company) (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SEICA (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:SEICA (company) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:SEICA (company). Thanks! McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 17:17, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi McMatter I appreciate a lot your feedbacks, please forgive me but in your last comment I cannot understand what I am doing wrong with references, I mean: I put just public sites, newspaper articles and online magazine references, what do you mean exactly? It is just to understand how to manage this situation. YumaIOT (talk) 07:48, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SEICA (company) (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SEICA (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:17, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SEICA (company) (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SEICA (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:41, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi may I ask what reference(s) are not qualified? I put a dozen of references so that I would need to know what of them are not good in order to remove/change them, may you help me? Thanks in advance, KR, Yuma YumaIOT (talk) 09:27, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

As I said in my earlier review comment, with the possible exception of ref #5 (now #4), none of the sources meets the WP:GNG standard required.

I should also warn you that this has now been declined 11 times, which is exceptional. There is a real risk that at the next review it will be rejected outright, if the sources aren't materially better. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:31, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Dear DoubleGrazing thank you so much for the explanation, I will work to fix the sources as better as possible. May I ask you a favor? May you indicate me what sources were used for approving the following article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPEA_(company) I cannot find them (for taking example), maybe they are hidden or visible just for reviewers? YumaIOT (talk) 13:16, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

SPEA (company) will soon be deleted, because it has no sources. You should base any draft on featured articles or good articles not garbage. Theroadislong (talk) 13:19, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

OK, sure, will do it. Thanks again for the explanation. KR, YumaIOT (talk) 13:41, 8 November 2023 (UTC)