User:Research is c00L/Environmental gentrification/Bibliography

You will be compiling your bibliography and creating an outline of the changes you will make in this sandbox.

Bibliography

Edit this section to compile the bibliography for your Wikipedia assignment. Add the name and/or notes about what each source covers, then use the "Cite" button to generate the citation for that source.

Assess the article (skim):

• why you think the source is reliable.
• what in the source will be helpful for you when adding to your chosen Wikipedia article.

Academic Sources

Immergluck, D., & Balan, T. (2018). Sustainable for whom? green urban development, environmental gentrification, and the atlanta beltline. Urban Geography, 39(4), 546-562. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2017.1360041

• Skim Assessment:
  • This is a peer-reviewed journal article discussing the affect sustainable urban development projects have on housing and property values. It focuses specifically on the Atlanta Beltline project, but also discusses the impact these sustainable development projects have on gentrification more broadly.
  • Can give insight into ways sustainable and green development projects have good and bad effects on communities within a city. It also gives insight into why city officials do these projects. Atlanta could also be added to the examples section.
• After Reading:
  • This is a fairly well written article. However, it is primarily focused on the Atlanta Beltline project, which could be useful if creating a section on this in the Wikipedia article. It provides a little overview on other sustainable development projects and the effects that has had on property values in other places. It also discusses ways to adress changing property values in a more equitable way. It appears there is no conflict of intrest reported by researchers, but some research from one author is included in article.
  • topic notes:
    • The use of sustainability as a front to the true value and goal of economic growth (Immergluck and Balan 2018: 4-5)
      • Making the sustainability development sound better by using the good impacts on the environment, but real goal is to bring in money
    • Repurposing underused or abandoned infrastructure into parks or riverfronts and the affect on current residents (Immergluck and Balan 2018: 5)
      • High Line in NY brought in retail and residential development in addition to the environmental development- attracted wealthier people, and raised housing prices
    • Planning for affordable housing amidst development (Immergluck and Balan 2018: 6-7)
      • context of beltline: planned to set aside money to build affordable housing, no plans for keeping housing affordable for existing residents
    • Impacts of development on homes nearby, specifically home values and property tax and their effects on low income residents (immergluck and Balan 2018: 13-14)
    • Possible ways to offset these effects when considering development projects (Immergluck and Balan 2018: 14-15)

Pearsall, H., & Anguelovski, I. (2016). Contesting and resisting environmental gentrification: Responses to new paradoxes and challenges for urban environmental justice. Sociological Research Online, 21(3), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3979

• Skim Assessment:
  • This is also a peer-reviewed journal article that discusses the different ways communities and activists have been adressing gentrification due to environmental development. It is a source from Great Britian, which gives a more international view on the topic, but is relevant to what is happening in the States as well. They compare their findings to environmental justice responses to gentrification.
  • This article can give insight to ways environmental gentrification is being adressed. The article has little on this topic.

Quinton, J., & Nesbitt, L. (2024). Different names for the same thing? A systematic review of green, environmental, eco-, ecological, climate, carbon, and resilience gentrification. Cities, 151, 105107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105107

• Skim Assessment:
  • This is a peer-reviewed academic journal article.
  • This article gives an overview and defines the different terms used to refer to environmental gentrification, and also discusses related terms. As a literature review, it brings together many different sources to track the trends and uses of these terms to see how they overlap. This article would be helpful to understand the information about environmental gentrification out there already and get a better understanding of the terms used to define it as well. The Wikipedia article does mention many of these terms as well, so this article would be helpful in adding context to those terms.

Krings, A., & Schusler, T. M. (2020). Equity in sustainable development: Community responses to environmental gentrification. International Journal of Social Welfare, 29(4), 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12425

• Skim Assesment:
  • This is a Peer-reviewed academic journal article from the International Journal of Social Welfare.
  • This article is a literature review of various interdiciplinary academic articles all relating to the commmunity activim response to environmental gentrification. This article is written through the lens of social work, and how it overlaps with promoting equitable sustainability in communities. This article would be helpful in learning about how various communities have responded to environmental gentrification, and with the interdiciplinary lens, it can provide a well-rounded understanding.

Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2011). The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability. Sustainable Development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England), 19(5), 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.417

• Skim Assesment:
  • This is a peer-reviewed journal article from the interdiciplinary journal Sustainable Development.
  • This article focuses on defining social equity and social sustainability in an European urban context, which could add more depth to the section of the article discussing social equity. The article reviews other ways social sustainability has been discussed.

Anguelovski, I., Connolly, J. J., Cole, H., Garcia-Lamarca, M., Triguero-Mas, M., Baró, F., Martin, N., Conesa, D., Shokry, G., del Pulgar, C. P., Ramos, L. A., Matheney, A., Gallez, E., Oscilowicz, E., Máñez, J. L., Sarzo, B., Beltrán, M. A., & Minaya, J. M. (2022). Green gentrification in European and North American cities. Nature Communications, 13(1), Article 3816. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31572-1

• Skim Assesment:
  • This peer-reviewed academic journal article studies the impact of enviromental gentrification in cities across Europe and North America. It notes some of the benefits of Environmental green scpace, but also points out the multi-layered disparieties that occur in low-income areas with the creation of these urban green spaces. The international view on this article can help bring a more rounded perspective of the issue, rather than keeping the focus on the United States.
    

Newspaper Sources

"Black-Led Urban Farms are Thriving -- Until they have to Fight for their Land; Urban Farms Play a Vital Role in Feeding Communities but are Hampered by Precarious Leases and Gentrification." The Guardian (London), 2022.https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/mar/05/black-led-urban-farms-are-thriving-until-they-have-to-fight-for-their-land?CMP=share_btn_url

• Skim Assessment:
  • This is an article from The Guardian, which is on the list of reliable sources for Wikipedia. It is also a news article, not an opinion article. It discusses how Black Urban farmers have been fighting for food security, but are pushed off their land as a result of gentrification, and how they comat this issue.
  • This article gives insight to a different side of environmental gentrification. It shows how communtiy members have been making their neighborhoods more sustainable, but gentrification thwarts their efforts.

Sisson, P. (2022, November 10). A challenge for cities: Going green, without the gentrification. Bloomberg.com. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2022-11-10/a-challenge-for-cities-going-green-without-the-gentrification?utm_source=website&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=copy

• This is an article from Boomberg news, which is on the list of reliable sources for Wikipedia.
• This article provides insight to what structures cities looking to include green infrastructure can put in place to reduce the impact of gentrification on current residents.

Outline of proposed changes

• Add to the section about Environmental Getrification (EG) and Environmental Justice to discuss ways gentrification has been adressed by community activists.
• Possibly restructure the articles sections to have a smoother read and flow.
  • much of the article is disjointed, and the concepts discussed don't flow into each other in a way that is easy for a reader to fully grasp the subject.
  • the article also has backgrounds on topics that already have Wkipedia pages, which is a bit confusing, but they are slightly necessary to fully grasp the subject as well. Maybe adding more focus to the backgrounds to the subject of environmental gentrification rather than gentrificaltion or sustainabilty as a whole is needed
  • also, upon looking at the sources, there are many sentences and paragraphs that are not sourced well (either no citations are present, or they only have one citation), so adding some additional sources can benefit this article.