Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 February 27
February 27
- File:Envy Seven Deadly Sins.JPG
- File:Wrath Seven Deadly Sins.JPG
- File:Greed Seven Deadly Sins.JPG
- File:Sloth Seven Deadly Sins.JPG
- File:Gluttony Seven Deadly Sins.JPG
- File:Lust Seven Deadly Sins.JPG
- These images seem to be an artist (the uploader's) personal interpretation of the Seven Deadly Sins. I don't believe that hosting images of how one non-notable artist feels they are exemplified in photos is proper. seresin ( ¡? ) 05:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- delete per nom. also do not appear to have any value for illustrating other articles. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:23, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- delete agreed. I was just looking at the Envy page and was really confused. This is not an encyclopedic image for this article. Optimusnauta (talk) 07:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free image. There is nothing iconic about it and it would not impair reader understanding to simply not have a photo. B (talk) 03:28, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Eadesplace (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, summary says "© 2008 Blake Scott, Arbitrage Records", so non-free. JaGatalk 06:30, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Orphaned, intended for a page that got deleted. JaGatalk 06:32, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per unencyclopedic. --Artene50 (talk) 10:27, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- no source given and copyright status is unclear. the source is another wiki page, true source not listed. copyright tag states photo is released for promotional use, we have no evidence of this. as discussed in several TV series pages, would be better replaced with a screenshot, DVD series are widely available, maybe someone can grab one from them. Ejfetters (talk) 07:23, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Raymondaaron (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned. Properly OTRS accredited, uploaded by subject of picture for use in an article on himself that was deleted at AfD and, as far as I can recall, never used. No obvious alternative use despite skill being shown in the picture! Fiddle Faddle (talk) 07:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Unused, unencyclopedic. Can't tell what the photo is of. §hepTalk 20:59, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete: One of the worst quality images that is not even used, even if we could identify what it really is. ww2censor (talk) 00:05, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete The uploader should choose a better image of the stadium. This one is almost unusable. --Artene50 (talk) 10:25, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- This is a FAN MADE album cover, it is not official, this song has not been announced, or confrmed as a single, it is assumed by an interview where it was stated it 'MIGHT' be a single Alankc (talk) 21:00, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:CBALL No one can predict the future except God. --Artene50 (talk) 10:26, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Since it's a fan-art cover, the licensing rationale in the image is completely bogus. That makes it a candidate for CSD under rule 7, "Invalid fair use claim".—Kww(talk) 02:45, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Legolas2186 (notify | contribs).
- This image is merely a picture of the artist and a telephone. It adds nothing to readers' understanding of the article, and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding. Stifle (talk) 22:45, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- I completely disagree. The image shows an instant of the video where it shows the artist waiting for a telephone call from her lover. This does add to the readers understanding and frankly, how can you expect to convey the mood, the emotion portrayed in the picture through words? This image doesnot fail NFCC#8. --Legolas (talktome) 03:41, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Legolas2186 (notify | contribs).
- This image is merely a non-free picture of the artist. It adds nothing to readers' understanding of the article, and certainly nothing which cannot be conveyed by free text. Its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding. Stifle (talk) 22:46, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- It illustrates the expensive dress worn by the artist in the music video, not describable by words, hence in no way fails NFCC#8. --Legolas (talktome) 03:41, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- It illustrates a signifcant element of the video. This image should be kept. JayJ47 (talk) 08:16, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Legolas2186 (notify | contribs).
- This image is merely a non-free picture of the artist. It adds nothing to readers' understanding of the article, and certainly nothing which cannot be conveyed by free text. Its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding. Stifle (talk) 22:46, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- New version uploaded. --Legolas (talktome) 03:41, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete I don't see how it's adding anything to the article. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 00:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Legolas2186 (notify | contribs).
- This image is merely a non-free picture of the artists. It does not add to readers' understanding of the article. Its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding. Additionally, by using four shots from the video, it constitutes using multiple images when one would suffice. Stifle (talk) 22:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- New version uploaded, doesnot fail NFCC#8. --Legolas (talktome) 03:41, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- Violates the Wikimedia Foundation's logo use restrictions ([1][2]). —Remember the dot (talk) 22:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Random_Passer-by (notify | contribs).
- non-free stamp being used to prove that she appeared on a stamp; could be conveyed by text alone Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:21, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Its a non-free French government stamp. Copyright belongs to the French state. --Artene50 (talk) 06:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
