Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 February 28

< February 27	March 1 >

February 28

Toobis1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toobis1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Toobis (notify | contribs).

Unused personal photo. Absent uploader (indef blocked). Sherool (talk) 04:05, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Another useless image for wiki sadly. (There are too many) --Leoboudv (talk) 05:37, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per nom and spam. Ejfetters (talk) 06:12, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

I wanna be the guy title screen.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. PhilKnight (talk) 15:51, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:I wanna be the guy title screen.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Qrimmer (notify | contribs).

Delete. Image has an inadequate rationale and is of a needlessly large resolution. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 06:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, fix the rationale if needed, and is now tagged with {{fairusereduce}}. feydey (talk) 15:17, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep The image can be kept but needs a FU rationale. Someone care to add one? --Leoboudv (talk) 05:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but downsize. Stifle (talk) 14:30, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. To elaborate, my main concern with this image is the detail lost if it is downsized. Obviously, it's currently too large to comply with the fair-use policy, but reducing it will likely make the image of The Kid invisible, therefore negating part of the image's purpose. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 16:10, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but reduce size. Ejfetters (talk) 21:57, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Applebarnstar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Applebarnstar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Milk's_Favorite_Cookie (notify | contribs).

major portion of this image is a direct copy of a well-known logo used by apple computers ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 06:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It should be a non-free FU image instead. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Ejfetters (talk) 21:57, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Peach-Mango.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peach-Mango.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sugarisbad (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, intended for this deleted article. JaGa^talk 08:09, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

2007ISPBrochure-p1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2007ISPBrochure-p1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 518org (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. Found at Orphaned images in Category:Self-published work. JaGa^talk 08:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

2007ISPBorchure-p2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2007ISPBorchure-p2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 518org (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 08:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Great resolution but the uploader surely cannot claim copyright over the brochure. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:42, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete CV. Ejfetters (talk) 21:58, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wolfang IconTM.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wolfang IconTM.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lazzo1 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 08:13, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

WeJustGotBack.com logo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:WeJustGotBack.com logo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by WeJustGotBack (notify | contribs).

Either non-notable or copyvio. JaGa^talk 08:16, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Joe TE SA Style3.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joe TE SA Style3.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Joe the EchidnaFox (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 08:17, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Scott Storch Drawing.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scott Storch Drawing.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Playstationpsycho (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 08:18, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Utter rubbish Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 17:54, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete spam. Ejfetters (talk) 22:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

HKUMP45MAG.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HKUMP45MAG.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Asams10 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, low quality, little encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 08:20, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The image has almost no value. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:43, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

MeSouthPark2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MeSouthPark2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by EatAlbertaBeef (notify | contribs).

Derivative work, unused, invalid tag. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 11:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Ejfetters (talk) 22:01, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Idlewild_depot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: - Delete - As failing WP:NFCC#1 - also note that while the old image and a new one would show different surroundings it is needed to show that the difference would significantly decrease reader's understanding - Peripitus (Talk) 22:37, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Idlewild_depot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Grsz11 (notify | contribs).

Illustrates a subject for which a free image might reasonably be found or created that adequately provides the same information. PhilKnight (talk) 14:13, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: as stated before,[1] pictures have shown that the environment have considerably changed. Taking pictures of the structure now would not show the same or similar setting (old train depot) as in this photo, which is reported in the article. Jappalang (talk) 17:19, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Any free image that could be taken would show an entirely different surrounding that could not accurately portray the subject in its historical function as a train station. Grsz¹¹ 03:08, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Do I understand rightly that the ultimate point of this file is to depict a building? If so, has the building itself changed really? Is it possible to take a picture that depicts the building itself? If so, delete, because there's no reason someone else couldn't take a picture of it now. Pictures don't become automatically fair-useable simply because the vegetation has changed? Nyttend (talk) 03:56, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Not the building alone, but the historical setting—the building as the smallest full-service train depot in the US. Jappalang (talk) 22:19, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Text could easily convey this information. Stifle (talk) 14:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the argument that the surrounding have significantly changed seems to be a strong one, which would make this a non-replaceable fair use image. Ejfetters (talk) 02:34, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. What exactly does this image tell us that a current one with text wouldn't? That pictures used to be black and white? The picture is not that informative. It's like using a non-free picture of George Bush because he used to be the President. Just use a free picture and then mention it. Unless anyone believes that people won't get it without this incredibly informative picture that justifies violating someone's copyright? "I wouldn't have understood that article at all if it weren't for that slightly darker gray strip across the bottom. Thank God some Wikipedian had the foresight to use that image without the consent of the copyright holder so that I could have a better understanding of gray blotches." We need good reasons to violate someone's copyright, this isn't. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 10:00, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Markus001.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the image name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:06, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Markus001.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Usergreatpower (notify | contribs).

doubt this is self-made Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:40, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unless the guy is a gay photographer... Chuckle... Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 17:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Just ran across the article and the first thing I thought was there was no way the copyright licensing would be legit, and it doesn't look like it is. Mbinebri ^{talk ←} 23:43, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - the photograph is used here PhilKnight (talk) 23:45, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as copyvio. Stifle (talk) 14:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete CV. Ejfetters (talk) 22:05, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

BUSHKERRY DEBATE 3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:BUSHKERRY DEBATE 3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by UnitedStatesIndia (notify | contribs).

Fails WP:NFCC#8 - Disputed fair use rationale tag was removed with the explanation that there is critical commentary of the image exists in the section and the caption, but I don't see the image even mentioned. Mosmof (talk) 18:00, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8. Stifle (talk) 14:32, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, though I fully admit I'm not an expert on our image policies. I don't see how the image is replaceable, under the conditions the debates were filmed--the broadcast is copyrighted and the audience was limited and I'm not sure they were even allowed to take photos. The image itself isn't iconic, but isn't it enough that it depicts the historic event of the debates? The United States presidential election debates, 2004 is a bona fide historical event, not some random meeting between two people. A criteria that the image itself be commented upon may make sense for Simpsons episodes and the like but not for this. Otherwise we'd have no images in the article except weird ones like File:Kerrypen.jpg (which has copyright issues of its own, on an unrelated note). If nothing else the image depicts the town-hall format, as mentioned in the caption. Wkdewey (talk) 07:40, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's not enough that the image is not replaceable (although it could well be replaceable by text, such as "X and Y participated in a debate"). It must also add significantly to readers' understanding of the article, and I don't think this does. Stifle (talk) 09:53, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Ejfetters (talk) 22:07, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Delaware Memorial Bridge tollbooth.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:03, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Delaware Memorial Bridge tollbooth.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by KeithTyler (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, unsalvageably poor quality. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Angela petrelli.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -Nv8200p talk 13:48, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Angela petrelli.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Reevnar (notify | contribs).

publicity type shot of unknown origin, another wiki credited as the source, original source and copyright unknown. states released for promo. use with no clear source of this, better suited to replace with screencap as in numerous other fictional tv character pages. Ejfetters (talk) 19:57, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete Normally I would keep it but there is indeed no clear source. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:45, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- A screencap would be less infringing because it is only a very small portion of the complete work, and this publicity shot is the complete work, this is the argument made for the Star Trek character publicity shots as well, which led to them being replaced. Ejfetters (talk) 02:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Fdpsxtitle.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fdpsxtitle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Doom jester (notify | contribs).

Basically the same picture as the cover art used in the same article: File:Final Doom Coverart.png. This is just an ingame representation of the same image. Mika1h (talk) 20:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Ejfetters (talk) 22:08, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

BattlestarGalactica -- 3x03 - Exodus P1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:BattlestarGalactica -- 3x03 - Exodus P1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Matthew (notify | contribs).

Fails Wikipedia:NFCC#8, being only a screenshot of a character it does not significantly increase the readers understanding of the plot of the episode it is supposed to illustrate Million_Moments (talk) 21:37, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Altairisfar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Altairisfar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Altairisfar (notify | contribs).

Unused personal photo. Sherool (talk) 22:54, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No longer used by me. Altairisfar _talk 23:30, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted because of Altairisfar's request made here. Nyttend (talk) 03:52, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Locker_104_May_23_07.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Locker_104_May_23_07.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jerico9spd (notify | contribs).

Unused personal photo. Absent uploader Sherool (talk) 23:13, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are probably hundreds of school locker images on Commons. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:48, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Leoboudv. Ejfetters (talk) 22:09, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.