Jump to content

User talk:212.183.136.194

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 212.183.136.194 (talk) at 15:56, 5 May 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Note: This is a shared IP address for vodafone 3G users.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

212.183.136.194 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

unblock me immediately!

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=unblock me immediately! |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=unblock me immediately! |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=unblock me immediately! |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Spam warning

Adding unrelated external links to articles is considered vandalism. If you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be temporarily blocked from editing.

-- DLX 11:08, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chinese folk religion, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ck lostsword|queta!|Suggestions? 19:10, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Merchant account, you will be blocked from editing. Trusilver 20:38, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Merchant account provider, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from any site that uses the MediaWiki spam blacklist, which includes all of Wikimedia and Wikipedia. Trusilver 20:41, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[1] --Ronz 00:09, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Graham Jones?

A page like the article Graham Jones referring to a living person is confusing is another living person also has the same name. I am the author Graham Jones (28 books published). I want to make it clear this page is not about me. Every time I do that someone edits out my comment. Biography pages about living people are fine. But they need to be revised so that living people with the same names can be distinguished. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.183.136.194 (talk • contribs)

Ok, a couple of points (1) you claim you are an author called Graham Jones, that can't be proven but we assume good faith here; (2) other links you have placed on Wiki according to your edit record have also been removed by other editors, due to notability/value-add issues; (3) if you or other people with the name "Graham Jones" were notable under WP:BIO then they/you would have a Wiki entry already, or could have requested it; (4) the other notable Graham Jones listed here before is now simply a link to another entry, and he creates more Google hits than you or the actor now listed. You could have placed a disambiguation point at the top, but seem to insist on externally linking the piece you put in the main page - making me think that you want to create coverage/link to your own site as opposed to mainly a point of clarity: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and does not add external links unless they add value to a reader of an article - see WP:EXT. A number of ways to address your concerns - but first question: do you pass WP:BIO? Rgds, --Trident13 13:20, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent changes

Please refrain from adding nonsense into articles as you did here [2]. This IP address has been noted for multiple spam links and other vandalism. If you continue to edit in these ways, you risk being blocked from editing. Thank you. DigitalNinja 19:16, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Daz Sampson

Your recent edit to Daz Sampson was a serious violation of WP:BLP. Any further breaches of this magnitude will lead to you being banned from editing Wikipedia. TomPhil 19:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Thanks for experimenting with the page Legoland on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to David James (footballer), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: David James (footballer) was changed by 212.183.136.194 (c) (t) deleting 13842 characters on 2008-01-17T19:34:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:35, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Paradise Garage

  • I removed the addition of "gay" from the description of Paradise Garage. I have no idea if its accurate or not, but since it wasn't sourced, and commonly is added as vandalism, I removed it. If it's accurate, please source it and add it back in. Xymmax (talk) 03:52, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John Churchill, 1st Duke of Marlborough, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John Churchill, 1st Duke of Marlborough was changed by 212.183.136.194 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-02-16T18:45:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:45, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Confirmation (Catholic Church). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 10:46, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to James Kerr (Texas), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: James Kerr (Texas) was changed by 212.183.136.194 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-03-09T20:24:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:24, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Portadown constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 20:32, 9 March 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Eamonn Holmes. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. J.delanoygabsadds 20:47, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Solar energy, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Solar energy was changed by 212.183.136.194 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-03-15T16:39:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:39, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gordon Burns, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Gordon Burns was changed by 212.183.136.194 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-03-23T22:39:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:39, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gordon Burns, you will be blocked from editing. --Adamfinmo (talk) 22:46, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tiuna, you will be blocked from editing. --Adamfinmo (talk) 22:46, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Hungary, you will be blocked from editing. Hobartimus (talk) 20:40, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to water-fuelled car, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:55, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contribution to Gothenburg, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the Sandbox to get started. Thank you. Lord Foppington (talk) 22:15, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. gadfium 22:33, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Brian Harvey. Thank you. Onorem♠Dil 14:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wind farm, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Wind farm was changed by 212.183.136.194 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-04-30T18:53:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:53, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Shrek.
Any further vandalism will result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. ... richi (hello) 14:14, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Patricia Hodgson, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ... richi (hello) 14:15, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi, the recent edit you made to Television licensing in the United Kingdom has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. treelo talk 11:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Television licensing in the United Kingdom (historical), you will be blocked from editing. Nick Cooper (talk) 12:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Ramsey, Cambridgeshire has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Thingg⊕⊗ 16:13, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Tim Brunero has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ukexpat (talk) 21:26, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Tim Brunero constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. ukexpat (talk) 21:29, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to History of chocolate has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. AVandtalkcontribs 11:53, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to History of chocolate constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Chris 11:55, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to History of chocolate constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. RedThunder 11:56, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to History of chocolate. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. RedThunder 11:57, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to History of chocolate. RedThunder 11:59, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Pearl City, Hawaii has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ukexpat (talk) 20:06, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Mike Comrie. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tabercil (talk) 13:55, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Nantwich has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ScarianCall me Pat! 15:53, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

The recent edit you made to Red Issue constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. RJaguar3 | u | t 22:11, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Red Issue. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. RJaguar3 | u | t 22:16, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Amigos. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --Oxymoron83 16:59, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Amigos. J.delanoygabsadds 17:00, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. J.delanoygabsadds 17:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to J Dilla has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 18:52, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Richard Wright (musician). It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Booglamay (talk) - 23:27, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Your recent edit to Jody Latham (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 19:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Jody Latham (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 19:08, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to St John Plessington Catholic College has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Res2216firestar 19:00, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Stirling High School has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 15:55, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ehsan-ul-Haq Piracha. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~Beano~ (talk) (contribs) 21:36, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to It's Coming has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Killiondude (talk) 08:10, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to It's Coming constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Killiondude (talk) 08:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Pyroclastic flow has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 21:50, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Yoda constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Martin451 (talk) 02:04, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Heroes (TV series), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Heroes (TV series) was changed by 212.183.136.194 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-12-07T15:02:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Second Life. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Piano non troppo (talk) 14:41, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to List of countries by foreign exchange reserves has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Gail (talk) 01:33, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Prince Edward, Earl of Wessex. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Piano non troppo (talk) 00:31, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Rita Ackermann has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 19:31, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Scottish Labour Party, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BritishWatcher (talk) 23:42, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


January 8th

Erm... The only edit i have made so far was the 'new labour sleaze and corruption party' to the scottish labour party page.. ( also a few others that i have had to problem with ) And this is a brand new laptop with new brand new internet connection :s

The recent edit you made to Poverty constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 23:47, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Enver Hoxha, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Enver Hoxha was changed by 212.183.136.194 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-01-11T11:52:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 11:52, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Roy Carroll

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Roy Carroll. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.

Keith D (talk) 22:51, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This GUYS SOOOOO GAY

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Quiff has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): img[0-9]+\.imageshack\.us/*(?:my\.php\?image=|img[0-9]+/).*\.(?:jpg|jpeg|png|gif|bmp|tif|tiff|swf) (links: http://img5.imageshack.us/my.php?image=quiff1ut6.png"). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Your edits to March 4

Dear 212.183.136.194,
Some of your edits on the page March 4 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

No Wikipedia page has been linked to.

If a Wikipedia page for the person already exists, add a link to it (by putting it in doubled square brackets [[Like this]]) and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 19:51, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hatfield Visual Arts College, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hatfield Visual Arts College was changed by 212.183.136.194 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-02-26T13:03:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:03, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Antrim has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Cheers Kyle1278 03:47, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Simply south is terug naar normaal 14:35, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Simply south (talk) 15:05, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page User talk:I have kept the bathroom clean has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Maen. K. A. (talk) 14:15, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:212.183.136.194&oldid=288072742"