Jump to content

User talk:Andre666

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Maashatra11 (talk | contribs) at 12:13, 12 August 2010 (→Painface). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Further information: [[:Archive 1, Archive 2]]

Nice job!

Yo Andre, great work on Them Crooked Vultures, cheers!  Skomorokh  10:10, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks a lot, but I haven't finished yet! There's still a lot of tidying I will do :) Andre666 (talk) 10:11, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:WolfmotherStudioMar9.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:WolfmotherStudioMar9.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:48, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:New Moon Rising Tour.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:New Moon Rising Tour.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:51, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:WolfmotherCosmicEggLimitedEdition.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:WolfmotherCosmicEggLimitedEdition.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:52, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cromagnon

See Cromagnon talk page. Rockgenre (talk) 00:10, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know anything about "Connecticut Tribe"? Rockgenre (talk) 01:14, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not quite. They are both the same album just under a different name, but the credits only on Orgasm list "Connecticut Tribe". Since this is such an obscure group it's unlikely that we will find out whether this was a backing group. "Connecticut Tribe" is credited for some of the songwriting, background vocals, and sound on Orgasm. But someone who posted a video for "Caledonia" on Youtube has said, "They said that they had a Connecticut tribe with which they would bring to fruition the ideas that they needed to express... the ultimate theme being "all is one" ESP gave them engineer Otto Schontze and some studio time. For three days they labored to fulfill their musical dream...producing an album titled "Orgasm", which they credited to Cromagnon. It was released in 1969. There actually was a Connecticut tribe of sorts, a typical hippie commune of the day, with several children included". I don't know how true that is, but do you think we should include this "Connecticut Tribe" under members? Rockgenre (talk) 19:23, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Black Sabbath (album)

Hi, I like what you did with the track lists, it looks much better. They tend to get out of control with the re-issues. J04n(talk page) 13:22, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've been meaning to bring the early Sabbath albums' pages up to a more respectable quality. Since you seem to have a similar interest here is a link that you may find useful. I've been sitting on it for too long now. J04n(talk page) 14:38, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dio personel

Hey, the table looks great but the two columns aren't working with most monitor settings. It is squishing the first column into one-word width. I assume you are looking at it on a wide-screen monitor. I'm going to get rid of the columns. J04n(talk page) 01:41, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GNREUTour01advert.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GNREUTour01advert.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:50, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WolfmotherNewMoonRising.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WolfmotherNewMoonRising.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:21, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MuseNewtonAbbotDemo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MuseNewtonAbbotDemo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:51, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MuseInYourWorld.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MuseInYourWorld.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:10, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Godsoftheearthtour.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Godsoftheearthtour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:05, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

Killing in the Name

Hey, fellow Basingstoke(ian?)! Just to let you know that I've removed the "leaked" figures from the Rage song article. There is no verifiable, reliable source to confirm these (the source given acknowledges that it's "unofficial", and doesn't state its source). I hope you cool with that – in any way, we'll find out shortly! Regards, matt (talk) 18:38, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Slipknot Project Roll Call

In an attempt to breath life back in to the Project I am arranging a Roll Call and will begin making arrangement for group initiatives throughout the coming months. Just so the Project can keep an updated list of people who continue to contribute to the Project a Roll Call will happen from time to time. It is understood that over time, users may have lost interest in the Project or Wikipedia all together; if you have, it's no big deal. If you would like to keep contributing to the project please sign the list here. If you do not add your name to the list by January 16, you will become an "Inactive member", this will bar you from voting in the AoF, as well as receiving the monthly newsletter. Remember, if you ever want to join the project again, you are always welcome!!! REZTER TALK ø 01:34, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010 Slipknot Newsletter

The Slipknot WikiProject Newsletter

Issue VI - January 16, 2010
If you would like to help out with future newsletters, please contact the Outreach Department.
Man, it's always the same, if we talk or complain
We only wanna upset the balance
How's it feel to be the New Abortion?
The only generation to suffer extortion
News and announcements
From the editors

Apologies to the editors for the lack of project activity in the past couple of months. But let's forget about that and move forward, we've had great success as a project so far and continue to improve articles. I would like to take this opportunity to remind editors that the main premise of this WikiProject is to bring editors together and collaborate on improving articles related to Slipknot. Editors are encouraged to address objectives mentioned on the project to-do list and arrange collaborations with other project members on the project talk page. If you want to work on an article but want help from other editors, ask for it here.

(sic) news

Slipknot recently concluded touring in support of their 2008 album All Hope Is Gone and released a short-film alongside the single "Snuff". Band members have begun working with their side-projects again, including Stone Sour and Dirty Little Rabbits, albums are expected from both of those bands in 2010.


File permission problem with File:AxlRose-BryanMantia-TommyStinson.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:AxlRose-BryanMantia-TommyStinson.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 10:25, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File permission problem with File:MuseACL2006.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MuseACL2006.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 10:30, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Oasis

I reverted what you did on the Oasis template because what you did had no justification. The band is now defunct so all band members should be on the same level. Zak Starkey has never been an official member of the band, and it is better to have the related articles organized, therefore easier to navigate through. If you have a good reason to change anything back to your way, please don't do so without asserting a very good reason. Iminrainbows (talk) 18:13, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for this "shouting". I was not trying to make myself seem "above you" in any way, I was pointing out the truth about these members of Oasis and I simply believe that major edits shouldn't be made without putting forth a good reason. And I'd also like to point out that these "negative comments" are the 9 bad edits out of the 1,000+ edits I've made on Wikipedia, the personal attacks aren't necessary.
Thank you, -Iminrainbows (talk) 22:09, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fort Minor: We Major

The article Fort Minor: We Major has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable mixtape with little or no media coverage of substance. Fails WP:NALBUM.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheJazzDalek (talk) 20:57, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

consensus

I set up a consensus section in the talk page for Battle Studies (album) to resolve a dispute. As u have edited this artice in the part, would u mind commenting? Dan56 (talk) 00:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Slipknot Project - AoF voting now open

Voting for the next Article of Focus from the Slipknot Porject is now open. You are invited to vote on which article you think the project should focus it's efforts on based on nominations from project members. Go to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Slipknot/AoF to vote and find out more! REZTER TALK ø 15:25, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Guns N' Roses singles

Template:Guns N' Roses singles has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:19, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FiveRockTheParty.jpeg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FiveRockTheParty.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
  • If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:44, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Five-SlamDunkDaFunk.jpeg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Five-SlamDunkDaFunk.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
  • If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:03, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:CKY_-_Familiar_Realm.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:CKY_-_Familiar_Realm.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 06:22, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

When making edits, could you please add an edit summary so that other users can understand your thinking, especially when you delete whole sections of an article. Cheers. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 17:02, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Andre666subpages

Please note that your owm subpages, such as the pages you nominated at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Andre666subpages, don't need to be nominated at Miscellany for deletion. In stead, just place a {{db-user}} on the pages, and some admin will delete them. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:27, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:26, 15 June 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Dagger Records releases

Category:Dagger Records releases, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:39, 14 July 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OzzyOsbourne-TalkOfTheDevil.jpeg
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OzzyOsbourne-TalkOfTheDevil.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:24, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jimibyhimself.gif
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jimibyhimself.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Painface

Hi Andre666! There's currently an AfD discussion ongoing about an article to whom you've been a main contributor, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Painface (2nd nomination). A question has been raised of whether it deserves a separate article or should be merged into Slipknot. Anyway, a user has expressed that he wishes to verify the article's content with further inline citations and maybe it "might make it clearer that the mentions are not just in passing and therefore this subject merits a separate article". I'd be happy if you could tell us (or me) where you got the information about the band from, when you inserted it here. Thanks for your help. :) Maashatra11 (talk) 07:37, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Maashatra. As you can see, the edit to which you are referring was made almost two years ago. As such, there is no way I could remember where I got my information for the article. It was most likely metal-archives.com, as that is my go-to source for many similar articles. Sorry I could not be of more help. Andre666 (talk) 12:04, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine, thanks for responding ! :) Maashatra11 (talk) 12:13, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010–11 Southampton F.C. season

Hi - congratulations on a great job so far.

Do you think there should be a mention of the club banning press photographers from St. Mary';s; it did make most of the national papers as well as the BBC? Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 11:37, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I personally don't think so - I don't think controversy has any importance to a season article. Maybe in the main club article, but that thing is a state anyway. The death of Liebherr, for example, affects the fixtures etc, but the controversy does not affect any elements of the season. I find that "general information"-type sections in club season articles are discouraged anyway, as this information makes up the general history of the club. Andre666 (talk) 11:40, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK - I'll leave it up to you. It's good to have someone interested in the club active on WP. As you can probaably see, my interest is mainly historical. There was some good stuff in the last two match programmes covering the earliest years, so I may start the season article for 1885-86 soon. Cheers. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 11:43, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andre! I posted something above. I hope you noticed it. Maashatra11 (talk) 11:48, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Andre666&oldid=378526433"