Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Waenceslaus

930310

Please note that a case was originally opened under Waenceslaus (talk · contribs) but has been moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/930310. Future cases should be placed under Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/930310.

– This SPI case is open.

All of these are WP:SPA bent on protecting article Anna Eliza Williams. They are !voting Keep in this discussion about it:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Eliza Williams. If these are not sockpuppets, they are at least meat puppets. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

This is the most ridiculous crap I have ever heard. Just because someone votes "Keep" in an AfD doesn't mean that they are a sockpuppet. Why not nominate the people who voted "Delete" as well? How can you be sure that they aren't sockpuppets? I am myself and almost every single account you can find on the internet with the username "930310" is associated to me, not someone else. 930310 (talk) 09:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As an admin who's probably involved here, I'd say it's a bit weak to use a single AFD discussion as evidence. There's probably two dozen or so discussions found at Wikipedia:WikiProject World's Oldest People/Article alerts that have similar patterns with possibly the same individuals. Note though that ARBCOM discretionary sanctions are available for any uninvolved admin which may be a better method of dealing with the more aggressive editors. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 11:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]