Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2016 February 16
February 16
Two files
- File:Ram Kamal Mukherjee.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Ram Kamal Mukherjee Picture.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
Two copies of the same file. Sourced to Google, without evidence of permission. The uploader claims to be the subject of the photograph (Ram Kamal Mukherjee). As there is no evidence that the uploader is the photographer (Vickky Idnaani), the uploader needs to ensure that the photographer provides evidence of permission. --Stefan2 (talk) 09:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Beparoyaa Poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Poster. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 09:29, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Gurinder Seagal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is claimed to be a selfie of a person called Gurinder Seagal. On File:Ram Kamal Mukherjee Picture.jpg, the uploader claims that he is called Ram Kamal Mukherjee. There is no evidence that the uploader is Gurinder Seagal. Stefan2 (talk) 09:30, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Debojit Saha Picture.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Looks like a screenshot of a TV programme, and the text
Aakash Aath Channel's Programme
on the file information page also suggests so. No evidence that the uploader is the photographer. Stefan2 (talk) 09:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:ArmandAssante-Belarus.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- If the image is copyrighted, as the uploader writes in its description, we can't use it. We have a free image, File:Armand Assante Za misli.jpg GRuban (talk) 15:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Benton Jennings.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- EXIF data clearly shows "David Beeler Photography". Text suggests uploader is the subject NOT the photographer, and no formal evidence of copyright transfer Ronhjones (Talk) 20:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
I am sorry, but you obviously have NO idea of the world of show business, actors and their headshots, or entertainment law. The file (photo)is MY property. The fact a photographer was hired to take the photo does not preclude MY ownership. Ninety3rd (talk) 06:25, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- If a photographer was hired, then the photographer is the copyright holder. You need to obtain permission from the photographer. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)