Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2016 February 17
February 17
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Dota 2 Heroes.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- As this is a game screenshot, wouldn't this go under screenshot rationale? Therefore, it's not "owned" by A.raxhid. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:14, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- Looks like a screenshot of a press/promotional photo (note the GUI arrow in the bottom left of the image). Unlikely that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY 10:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- Uploader is claiming own work but this appears to be a derivative image. According to the upload date info, this is from 2014 but there are instances of this image that predate this. For example, this Youtube video is from 2013 (see 1:02 mark in playback) and this blog post is from 2011. Whpq (talk) 14:02, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Placidachan.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader claims to be copyright holder but this appears to be a derivative work. See this page and look for "PATHIKULANGARA V.(ed.), Placidachan" A version of this image is on the book cover. Whpq (talk) 15:12, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Annie Mascarene.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader is claiming to be the copyright holder but this image appears to be a scan from some other source such as a newspaper or book. Whpq (talk) 15:16, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- This was tagged with {{non-free review}}, but I can't find any NFCR discussions about the file. The file is missing evidence of permission, though. Stefan2 (talk) 16:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:WSPA-TV Logo 2016.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is basic geometric shapes and letters. There is also a file on Commons. Too simple to be copyright. 🇺🇸 Corkythehornetfan 🇺🇸 21:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:FFD. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:11, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- It says that the author of this speech died more than 70 years ago, but this is a speech by Zog I of Albania, who died in 1961, i.e. less than 70 years ago. In the United States, the copyright to the speech would last until 95 years after it was held (i.e. until the end of 2025), and the copyright to the sound recording of the speech seems to last until the middle of February 2067. Stefan2 (talk) 21:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- It seems that this picture was taken by someone who was wanted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, so it is unlikely that the photographer was an employee of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Stefan2 (talk) 21:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- It says
Photo provided by Laissez Faire Books
so the uploader is unlikely to be the photographer. Stefan2 (talk) 21:44, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: convert to fair use and split histories. — ξxplicit 01:46, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Dublin Airport Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file: two in one. The copyright tag PD-textlogo only seems to apply to the uploads from 2008 and 2012 but not to the uploads from 2015. Stefan2 (talk) 21:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.