User talk:Izudrunkizuhadenough

Welcome!

Hello, Izudrunkizuhadenough, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Gamergate controversy Wikipedia article controversy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Meters (talk) 03:15, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Gamergate controversy Wikipedia article controversy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Gamergate controversy Wikipedia article controversy. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Gamergate controversy. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Gamergate controversy – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Meters (talk) 03:15, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article I created covers part of the topic that is in it's own right very notable.--Izudrunkizuhadenough (talk) 03:18, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also the artcle you mentioned did not cover that sub-topic as much as was warranted.--Izudrunkizuhadenough (talk) 03:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you have something useful to add to the topic then add it to the existing article. Don't fork a new article. Meters (talk) 03:22, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 17 September 2016 United States attacks

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as 17 September 2016 United States attacks, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 23:35, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It appears others did not think it should be speedily deleted either given the switch to regular deletion.--Izudrunkizuhadenough (talk) 23:51, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 17 September 2016 United States attacks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 17 September 2016 United States attacks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/17 September 2016 United States attacks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. epicgenius (talk) 23:41, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Seeker Daily YouTube comments

Hello Izudrunkizuhadenough,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Seeker Daily YouTube comments for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 23:56, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm Parsley Man. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 15 October 2011 global protests have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Parsley Man (talk) 03:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

VEGETTA777

It's not a Wikipedia page. Please write one or the text will be deleted.Xx236 (talk) 06:35, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of VEGETTA777

Hello Izudrunkizuhadenough,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged VEGETTA777 for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Cotton2 (talk) 06:40, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]