Talk:Religion in Hungary

Hungary Unassessed

	Hungary portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Numbers in the 2011 census are wrong

I don't know where the information displayed comes from, but according to the Hungarian Central Statistical Office the numbers are quite different. Also, if you try to add up the current numbers, it's more than the total. Catholics, for example, appear at 3871000 in the xls file the Official census show. http://www.ksh.hu/nepszamlalas/tables_regional_00 --talk

Colours of the "undeclared" in the pie chart

I changed the colour of one section of the pie chart (for the group who didn't state their religion) from light grey to white. This was reverted with the comment: Unexplained change to visually overwhelmingly white - silver fits in aesthetically with irreligious and atheism. Obviously I should have explained the rationale for my change, however the user reverting my change actually did for me :-)

Silver fits indeed aesthetically with irreligious and atheism, as do the other colours of denominations of a religious group. However lumping together those, who didn't state anything, and a group that did (in this case the irreligious and atheists) is misleading. The undeclared didn't ally themselves with catholics, not with protestants and not with atheists or the irreligious - they just didn't say anything about their affiliation. They could be Catholics/Protestants/Atheists/Muslims/Buddhists/etc. being the opinion it's not a matter for the state to ask the religious affiliation of its citizens. I chose white for the following reasons: 1. It is visually distinct from the other colours (i.e. it doesn't lump this group to any other group) 2. It visually reduces the pie to those who actually answered the question - without concealing the fact that this substantial group exists. Therefore white seems to be the perfect colour of representing this group. Gugganij (talk) 11:14, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, white is an overwhelming and glaring shade which ended up dominating the entire chart. You're welcome to use a pastel colour to differentiate, but please don't use a shade in such glaring juxtaposition to the deep purple and other colours immediately surrounding it. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 01:10, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Religion in Hungary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070927225828/http://www.nepszamlalas.hu/eng/volumes/18/tables/load1_26.html to http://www.nepszamlalas.hu/eng/volumes/18/tables/load1_26.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All Wayback captures were redirects to the home page. Replaced with correct archived capture available at WebCite. Thanks, Cyberbot II. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:38, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]