Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.
This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G5 or G11 be undeleted here.
Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.
- Instructions for special cases
- G13. Abandoned Articles for creation submissions – see Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13 for instructions.
To contest deletions that have have already been discussed (in particular, at Articles for deletion), or that are likely to be controversial, please make a request at Wikipedia:Deletion review instead. |
Deletion discussions |
---|
|
Articles |
Templates and modules |
Files |
Categories |
Redirects |
Miscellany |
Speedy deletion |
Proposed deletion |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Asahd Khaled
Please restore page, user:RickinBaltimore. A wiki user deleted this page Asahd Khaled because he claimed there was no significance.
Asahd does meet the requirements set by Wikipedia though.
Has had SIGNIFICANT roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions -- exec producer on the album, also produced the song "shining".
WP:MUSICBIO Wiki rules state a person must have at least 1 of the 12 requirements for notability. Asahd has 3.
1. Has been the subject of MULTIPLE, non-trivial, PUBLISHED works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself.
2. Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart.
3. Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network.
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AjayTO (talk • contribs) 20:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - none of the information above was mentioned in the article, with or without reliable sources. —Anne Delong (talk) 15:46, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Two articles: Geometry template & Mathomat
Geometry template · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Mathomat · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]
Can the article Geometry template be undeleted, it was PRODed, so that I can do a tidy up in relation to:
Or, if attribution is not an issue here, then copy the content to User:Aoziwe/sandbox/Geometry template for me to work on it.
Also, can the content of the previous, deleted, version of Mathomat be copied to User:Aoziwe/sandbox/Mathomat (old) for me to work on it.
Subject to what is there and what else I can find, I am at this time presuming I will have one article with a couple of redirects, if an article is warranted after I review all the material available.
Thanks. Aoziwe (talk) 13:24, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Not done for the moment. See comments at the AfD.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 19:45, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Fuhghettaboutit. Any movement as a result of the apparent general agreement to fix / concatenate the histories as per your suggestion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathomat (2nd nomination), and anything else as per Spinningspark at the AfD too. Aoziwe (talk) 13:14, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Aoziwe Sorry! I sometimes have too much stuff going on and forget something. My apologies. I am at work and only have a few minutes and cannot do this with the care it requires right now. I will do this after work, today; that's a promise.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:29, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- No problem at all. We (most of us) have day jobs and are volunteers! Take the time you need. It is just that it all went very quite and I was not sure what might be happening. Consensus is a wonderful thing when it is clear, but it is not always. Cheers. Aoziwe (talk) 11:16, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- Fuhghettaboutit. I see you have done some work. Sorry but I am not clear, have you finished? Regards. Aoziwe (talk) 14:42, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Hey Aoziwe. Yes, everything was done the same day as my message above. I thought maybe I'd help by finding and adding sources. However, I looked for sources on the general "geometry template" topical scope (albeit, not a very deep dive; I spent maybe a half hour) and really found little, so it may be that it should be returned by a move back to the more restrictive title focused upon Mathomat (or maybe "Mathomat and MathAid, or something similar depending on what exists). By the way, given the Australia connection, I performed searches of both Trove (a digitization project of the National Library of Australia with over 5,000,000 Australian newspaper pages) and Papers Past (a digitization project of the National Library of New Zealand; over 2,000,000 New Zealand newspaper pages) and found little, but part of the problem is that searches of "mathomat" find huge numbers of false-positives for "mathomatics" and "mathomatician", despite the change from an "e" to an "o", and I saw no easy was to bypass that.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:47, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks Fuhghettaboutit. Yep know all about trove! I will start to see what I can do with Mathomat/Geometry template. Are you going to close off the AfD? Aoziwe (talk) 10:50, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Hey Aoziwe. Yes, everything was done the same day as my message above. I thought maybe I'd help by finding and adding sources. However, I looked for sources on the general "geometry template" topical scope (albeit, not a very deep dive; I spent maybe a half hour) and really found little, so it may be that it should be returned by a move back to the more restrictive title focused upon Mathomat (or maybe "Mathomat and MathAid, or something similar depending on what exists). By the way, given the Australia connection, I performed searches of both Trove (a digitization project of the National Library of Australia with over 5,000,000 Australian newspaper pages) and Papers Past (a digitization project of the National Library of New Zealand; over 2,000,000 New Zealand newspaper pages) and found little, but part of the problem is that searches of "mathomat" find huge numbers of false-positives for "mathomatics" and "mathomatician", despite the change from an "e" to an "o", and I saw no easy was to bypass that.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:47, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Fuhghettaboutit. I see you have done some work. Sorry but I am not clear, have you finished? Regards. Aoziwe (talk) 14:42, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- No problem at all. We (most of us) have day jobs and are volunteers! Take the time you need. It is just that it all went very quite and I was not sure what might be happening. Consensus is a wonderful thing when it is clear, but it is not always. Cheers. Aoziwe (talk) 11:16, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
David R. Hawkins
There might be some inappropriate contents in the page according to wikipedia policies, which can be left for further revision. But the entry should not be deleted, since there is a same-name entry in German Wikipedia, https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_R._Hawkins, suggesting it is an appropriate entry according to Wikipedia policies. —- talk 22:51, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David R. Hawkins (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:13, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- Zhongchuxiong, each Wikipedia is separate, and any deletion discussion here would trump the simple fact that it exists on another project, which really provides little precedent because of the way Wikipedia operates. See by analogy, WP:WAX. That being said, if the foreign language article contains content that if translated, would address the basis for deletion at the discussion (which here was notability concerns) it certainly might be a good basis for a recreation that would not be subject to CSD G4 as a "repost". It is also true here that the [2nd] deletion discussion was five years ago, so if, for example, there has been significant treatment of the subject in the types of reliable, secondary, independent, published sources that evidence notability in the intervening period, a new article using those sources would invalidate any G4, but the rub is that a repost cannot be a stub, or just contain the prior content. It must show the deletion discussion basis is no longer applicable. Regarding the canned template I posted above, if any request were to be made at Wikipedia:Deletion review, I would suggest any such nomination would be predominantly under the idea that "significant new information has come to light since a deletion that would justify recreating the deleted page"—which would the be supported by disclosing those suitable sources that have come into existence in the interim. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:27, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- Fuhghettaboutit, thanks for your detailed explanation. Pursuant to your explanation that this article was deleted on the basis of notability concerns, I've found a biography of this person written in 2012 by an independent author. Would that source be adequate for restoring this article? (Jeffrey, Scott. 2012. Doctor of Truth, The Life of David R. Hawkins. Creative Crayon Publishers) Bests--Zhongchuxiong(talk) 16:25, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Zhongchuxiong, each Wikipedia is separate, and any deletion discussion here would trump the simple fact that it exists on another project, which really provides little precedent because of the way Wikipedia operates. See by analogy, WP:WAX. That being said, if the foreign language article contains content that if translated, would address the basis for deletion at the discussion (which here was notability concerns) it certainly might be a good basis for a recreation that would not be subject to CSD G4 as a "repost". It is also true here that the [2nd] deletion discussion was five years ago, so if, for example, there has been significant treatment of the subject in the types of reliable, secondary, independent, published sources that evidence notability in the intervening period, a new article using those sources would invalidate any G4, but the rub is that a repost cannot be a stub, or just contain the prior content. It must show the deletion discussion basis is no longer applicable. Regarding the canned template I posted above, if any request were to be made at Wikipedia:Deletion review, I would suggest any such nomination would be predominantly under the idea that "significant new information has come to light since a deletion that would justify recreating the deleted page"—which would the be supported by disclosing those suitable sources that have come into existence in the interim. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:27, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Hampshire Scout Expeditions
- Hampshire Scout Expeditions · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] I hadn't finished editing the page before it went live, I wanted to save it as a draft and finish editing.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpricy93 (talk • contribs) 14:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Done Mpricy93, You will find the text in your user space at User:Mpricy93/Hampshire Scout Expeditions. However, so as not to waste your time, before doing any more work on it, please find several published independent articles about the organization (news or magazine reports, not press releases or the group's website) and limit the information in the article to what is published in these, not what people in the organization want to publicize.—Anne Delong (talk) 16:06, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Funk: The Music, the People and the Rhythm of The One
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Funk: The Music, the People and the Rhythm of The One · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Rickeyvincent77 (talk) 15:09, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Fixed submission, linked page. ~ GB fan 17:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Rickey Vincent is the name of the author of this book. Just sayin'.... --Orange Mike | Talk 23:53, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Done The book may be notable, but the text will need neutralizing and referencing. Rickeyvincent77, since you have a conflict of interest, be sure to submit the improved draft for review by pressing the large blue button, so that an uninvolved editor can judge its readiness for the encyclopedia.—Anne Delong (talk) 23:40, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adaptive Filtering by Optimal Projection
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adaptive Filtering by Optimal Projection · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Samuelboudet, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Samuelboudet (talk) 15:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Done Samuelboudet, the draft is now at: Draft:Adaptive filtering by optimal projection. However, before it will be accepted into the encyclopedia, you will need to show that "Adaptive Filtering by Optimal Projection" is a term in common use by others besides you and those working with you, and that it has been written about extensively in a number of independent published sources. Otherwise, the term will be considered a Wikipedia:Neologism and the article will not be accepted.—Anne Delong (talk) 23:59, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Kevin Johnston
The article was deleted about 10 years ago. I have recently created a new article about the same individual as he is now a YouTuber who is garnering significant news coverage in Canada (he became a YouTuber sometime after the previous article's deletion). I'd like to have the previous article undeleted so as to restore the history and also in case there is any material that is usable in the current article. Hungarian Phrasebook (talk) 23:46, 17 May 2017 (UTC) —Hungarian Phrasebook (talk) 23:46, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- The deleted content was unsourced BLP content, which we're not gonna restore. (Assuming it's even the same guy.) It also reeked of self-promotion. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:51, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Is it possible for me to see it? It's possible sources can be found for the basic content (without the self-promotion). I've just set an email address with my account. Hungarian Phrasebook (talk) 00:16, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- How do you know the content deleted 10 years ago has anything to do with your subject? Super common name. Legacypac (talk) 05:18, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Is it possible for me to see it? It's possible sources can be found for the basic content (without the self-promotion). I've just set an email address with my account. Hungarian Phrasebook (talk) 00:16, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Adaptive filtering by optimal projection
I, Samuelboudet, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Samuelboudet (talk) 05:44, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- I responded to a previous request for this same draft further up the page.—Anne Delong (talk) 00:13, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Bonin Bough
Please undelete and return to draft space so I may work on it and resubmit to AfC. — —አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 06:42, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Done SmartSE (talk) 09:32, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Live Exploit Immunisation
Please restore this page as a draft as it might be relevant to an "Immunisation" section (or alike) of the Zero-day (computing) page. No need to restore if its content only consisted of this: this. —Fixuture (talk) 10:10, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Linnon Stylz
Page did not have an updated source for a media listing for the artist. Promo Only. Attempted the update late. —Michicanna (talk) 19:28, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Download
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Download · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Velox14724, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Velox14724 (talk) 02:11, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Scott Trowbridge
I, Inasea, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Inasea (talk) 03:48, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
User:Umahoysala/sandbox/Garudanagiri Nagaraj
I, Umahoysala, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Umahoysala (talk) 08:50, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
John Layfield bullying and harassment allegations
- John Layfield bullying and harassment allegations · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
Please give me a copy of this article in my user space, as I'd like to work more on it and improve it. —Pinguinn 🐧 17:53, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
File:A. A. Gill BBC 2012.jpg
I discussed the image with Mifter, who deleted the image as orphaned. Actually, the image was removed by another admin, with whom I discussed the image. Right now, Mifter is taking a break at the moment. May you undelete the image, reinsert it into A. A. Gill, and then take it to FFD please? —George Ho (talk) 18:52, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Reading statements that BBC's operations in the US "are not non-profit", I wonder whether it's worth it. --George Ho (talk) 17:25, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- Done, restored per request. ℯxplicit 00:56, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft:WestRock Company
Please restore so that I can then redirect to WestRock and the page history of the work that was done on the Draft version will be maintained. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:40, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Russians people in Israel
- Talk:Russians people in Israel · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
This talk page should be undeleted and moved to Talk:Russian people in Israel with no redirect left behind. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:36, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- Done, restored and moved as requested. ℯxplicit 00:59, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Eúgèñė
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below — — Preceding unsigned comment added by IVFiPodTouch (talk • contribs) 12:53, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Rejected This was purportedly the "autobiograpy" of a character in a non-notable (possibly hoax) video game variant. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Edward Forchion
Previously deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Forchion(2nd nomination). Have subsequently created article Ed Forchion. Would like to see if there is any information or references of interest. Will then make restored article a redirect.Djflem (talk) 08:47, 22 May 2017 (UTC) —Djflem (talk) 08:47, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Erasmusgreen (talk) 13:34, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Draft:Left_Hand_Right_Hand&action=edit&redlink=1
William Feather
Once popular author, sometimes associated with H.L. Mencken, has many quotations that appear with some frequency in quote collections —Underalms (talk) 15:33, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Winthroopstan
This is a micronation. It is not a hoax or vandalism. This page is very important to me, because it is my micronation, and I would like the page back. There are many other pages of micronations on here, so why delete mine? —Winden89 (talk) 15:55, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- The bar for articles on micro nations is pretty high. You just confirmed the other deletion reason "08:49, 22 May 2017 Kusma (talk | contribs) deleted page Winthroopstan(A11: Made up by article creator or an associate, and no indication of importance/significance" by stating it belongs fo you. Wikipedia is not the proper outlet to promote your pet project. Legacypac (talk) 05:24, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Crowdspeaking
I, Kynerion, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kynerion (talk) 17:05, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Convergent Design
I, Pattymooney, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Patty Mooney (talk) 17:10, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Grist (literary journal)
I, 24.151.85.145, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 24.151.85.145 (talk) 17:39, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Joe DeRouen
I, Donaldvista, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Donald Vista (talk) 18:00, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Creating Draft:Untitled, Art
File:Phenomblue logo.png
I changed the licensing status to "PD-logo", so the previous revision should be undeleted. Also, the image is of the US company, whose article is deleted. —George Ho (talk) 21:35, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Jared Keylon
Deleted under WP:SOFTDELETE, since meets WP:NRODEO there is presumption that it meets WP:GNG and should be kept —RonSigPi (talk) 22:20, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft:The Software Toolworks
I, Bilofsky, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bilofsky (talk) 22:54, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft:The Onyx Tavern
I, Rick lay95, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rick lay95 (talk) 23:08, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Fleurieu Folk Festival
I, BrettWJensen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BrettWJensen (talk) 23:13, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Natan Friedland
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Edgfeinberg (talk) 01:22, 23 May 2017 (UTC) 2=The article was rejected for lack of adequate references. I could not speedily work on it at that time and left it too long. It was deleted in March 2017. I have time to work this summer on it and hoped to get it back to do do.
Draft:Robert Diamant, FAIA
I, 24.7.67.225, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 24.7.67.225 (talk) 03:35, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
European Foundation for South Asian Studies
- European Foundation for South Asian Studies · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
The page is about a non-profit think thank that promotes peace and security in the world, like other organisations such as Unicef and The Clingendael Institute (which have wikipedia pages as well), I think it is very important to have a page about this since it actually helps to make the world a better place and people can learn about it and maybe be inspired to do similar things in their own lives. —J.barakova1978 (talk) 08:23, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Crowdspeaking
I, Kynerion, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kynerion (talk) 08:52, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Crowdspeaking
I, Kynerion, think Wikipedia should be a neutral resource for the term "crowdspeaking", for now considered as a neologism, with a rising amount of requests from search engines. Instead of that, commercial platforms are monopolizing the results, and one of them has already its Wikipedia page (see Thunderclap) —Kynerion (talk) 09:04, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
{{subst:Refund/Draft:Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Metropolitan Solutions (AMS Institute)| }}
File:George Institute.png
I re-tagged the logo as free to use in the US. Unsure about Australia as its original standards are very low, like that of the UK. However, I noticed that there were previous revisions of the image, so they should be undeleted. —George Ho (talk) 11:38, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Comparison of font editors
I, John doe 120, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. —john doe 120 (talk) 12:48, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Mark Stanley (guitarist)
I, Walrus Boot, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Walrus Boot (talk) 15:21, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Justin Tyler
User meets WP:N —Spiritualasf (talk) 16:38, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Articles that were deleted by community input are not restored unless otherwise convincing but, considering you started a Draft, that should be sufficient space because it's simply no different from the community-imposed deletion. SwisterTwister talk 05:29, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Betty Van Patter
I, Berksee, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SunriseSam (talk) 17:42, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Study Plan
I, Dpammm, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dpammma (talk) 17:58, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
and
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 81.110.20.13 (talk) 18:07, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Not done and will not be done – We cannot accept empty requests. (non-admin closure) ToThAc (talk) 14:10, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Adam Ray (actor)
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Katyhansen89 (talk) 18:47, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Kabir Ruma Babangida
The page was created as new no copy from any website or wikipedia page, lease restore the page as I intend to work on it. —Awwal1st (talk) 19:46, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Not done The article was deleted because it was blatantly promotional. It would require a complete rewrite; it's easier to start over than to try and salvage that page. Huon (talk) 20:27, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 49.224.72.2 (talk) 20:43, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Stephan Rothlin
==
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Ladanyi-verein (talk) 21:07, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
User:BC1278/Caryn Marooney2
I, BC1278, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BC1278 (talk) 21:11, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Southside Comets Football Club
I, Hoey906, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hoey906 (talk) 00:13, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
DJ Many
Care To Restore That Page About Me... I Think I'm Notable Now This Article In Inc. (magazine) Explains http://www.inc.com/john-boitnott/how-to-use-your-talent-to-attract-the-attention-of-major-brands.html Along With This Article In The American City Business Journals http://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/news/2016/03/14/dj-many-twitter-personality-emanuel-thomas.html Or You Could Always Just Google Me. Also I Now Have A Huge Cult Following Now With Over A Million Followers On Twitter http://Twitter.com/DJMany I Also Have A New Music Video On VEVO http://www.vevo.com/artist/dj-many With This Guy Donny Osmond Which Currently Has Over A Million Views Which Once Again Verifies My Cult Following. Wich Meets This Articles Guidelines https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Entertainers I Previously Failed This Because I Was Not Notable Back When My Page Was Deleted. I Would Think I Have Passed The Threshold Now. DJ Many56 (talk) 11:48, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Many (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Daniel (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Yunshui 雲水 12:11, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Deepak Dubey
I, Drdubey27, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Drdubey27 (talk) 12:28, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft:National Civic Art Society
I, Rundmt, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rundmt (talk) 13:42, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Hellenic Electronic Center
==
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Thanos7v (talk) 14:48, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Undeletion Request
Draft:Hellenic Electronic Center
I, Thanos7v, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Thanos7v (talk) 14:53, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Virus Total Screenshot.jpg
Hi, Technically not undeletion but I was wondering if an admin could restore my "09:07, 23 January 2017" revision - I planned to reupload however now I don't have a 1366x768 laptop my new version would probably look odd on bigger screens, Also I'll add {{non-free no reduce}} this time, Thanks, —–Davey2010Talk 17:36, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
==
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) History devotee (talk) 02:42, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Evesham Flats
Draft:Evesham Flats
{{subst:refund|1= Draft:Evesham Flats |2= Will address most recent feedback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by History devotee (talk • contribs) 02:44, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Joshua Stein
I, BioHistoryFan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BioHistoryFan (talk) 05:45, 25 May 2017 (UTC)