Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Johnston
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:03, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete vanity article about a logo designer created by User:300Bucks.ca. Guess what service is provided at the website 300bucks.ca. Moreover, there are unsubstantiated claims about him helping to pull the Hamilton Tiger-Cats out of financial difficulties while a 20-year old working with the team's marketing department. Also, claims in the article include "premier graphic and logo designer" and "he has become the nation’s most sought-after designer". Mindmatrix 18:28, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- delete per nom MNewnham 18:45, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no cited evidence of notability. Also, I removed a couple unverified claims, so please review the history of the article before voting (or speedying, which shouldn't be done, since a claim of notability was made). --Rob 19:00, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete wow very POV. --Pboyd04 19:03, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. --NoeJustin 21:22, December 28 2005 (UTC)
- Delete for reasons listed above. No evidence of notability. --GrantNeufeld 22:39, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom --Jaranda wat's sup 03:57, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- delete for reasons above. The claimed information is unsubstantiated . --Hurricane111 05:38, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- And unsubstantiatable. Does anybody really keep stats on this sort of thing? Is there a list somewhere that quantifies Canada's most sought-after graphic designers? Delete. Bearcat 09:16, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.