Jump to content

User talk:174.3.155.181

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 174.3.155.181 (talk) at 21:40, 30 June 2017 (just asking if i will be banned again if i request arbitration (due process) wrt baseless reversions (w/ no substantive defense) of my edits that showed James Gregory influenced Isaac Barrow "bigly" lol ("it's true, it's damn true"-Kurt Angle)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for your disruptive editing and refusal to abide by the RfC consensus at Isaac Barrow. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

July 2016

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for continuing to sock as Gagz7. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN talk to me 17:40, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

misc

@David Eppstein: i think it's safe to say that @Ohnoitsjamie and NeilN: are the most fun to be around lol ;) lighten up guys wow. i didn't think using remaining space of my edit summary to share an INTERNAL (not EXTERNAL) link to The Last Waltz would get you so upset User:Ohnoitsjamie.

your original request asked that i not waste the entire summary with lyrics, which was fair because i originally wasn't even summarising the content of my insertion which is bad. however i did summarise my edit and used the remaining space to share some good stuff, what's the harm in that? whatever lol 174.3.155.181 (talk) 21:43, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:46, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note the editor currently using this IP has been blocked indefinitely. [1] --NeilN talk to me 23:49, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hudson Hoagland

Hello, 174.3.155.181. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Hudson Hoagland".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 05:30, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:David Ingvar

Hello, 174.3.155.181. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "David Ingvar".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 07:52, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

and the commons yelled...

"... RELEASE THY BEAST"

they said

== asking if i'll be banned for asking for arbitration on a reasonable topic -- @Bbb23: are you going to ban me again if i ask for arbitration upon expiration of the current ban?