User contributions for 174.3.155.181

2 July 2017

• 18:2718:27, 2 July 2017 diff hist +1,184 User talk:174.3.155.181 since i'm in a position to talk to these kids&they listen,i ain't no politician,but i'll kick it w/ em a minute.cos see they call me a menace&if the shoe fits i'll wear it,but if it don't y'all will swallow the truth,grin&bear it

1 July 2017

• 18:3418:34, 1 July 2017 diff hist +6 User talk:174.3.155.181 Updating flagicon to represent the real flag of Canada&not the one made by duplicitous Lester B. Pearson, who is only revered in the world's largest Indian Zoo called Toronto, Ontario. Shame most "Canadians" wave that Maple Leaf w/o understanding.
• 18:0918:09, 1 July 2017 diff hist +18,028 User talk:174.3.155.181 restoring previous version of talk page that admin-in-question (that abused authority, invoking WP:SOCK when i clearly stated they're related) removed out of bias (early edit history suggests he is apart of the demographic studied by James Mill).
• 17:4617:46, 1 July 2017 diff hist +461 User talk:174.3.155.181 just finishing thought that selfless edits by likes of User:David Eppstein User:Slawomir Bialy User:Michael Hardy User:Wcherowi User:D.Lazard User:Tomruen User:TakuyaMurata r for nought, in light of admins' misplaced priorities
• 17:3817:38, 1 July 2017 diff hist +1,693 User talk:174.3.155.181 calling on dr eppstein, a fellow computing scientist and mathematician, to get involved in this matter. it is upsetting that there is an agenda being promoted at the expense of correctness and due process.
• 16:5216:52, 1 July 2017 diff hist +193 User talk:174.3.155.181 I find it disappointing that User:Mkdw reverts my preliminary request, and then the same person User:Bbb23 comes in and bans me for requesting due process, when clearly (larger) nuisances on this site get more attention from ARBCOM than legit reqs
• 16:4916:49, 1 July 2017 diff hist +728 User talk:174.3.155.181 →blocked for requesting arbitration again: new section
• 01:4201:42, 1 July 2017 diff hist +3,836 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee →preliminary inquiry regarding arbitration request: new section

30 June 2017

• 22:4422:44, 30 June 2017 diff hist +1 User talk:174.3.155.181 Eadum resurgo mutata ["changed and yet the same, I rise again"] -- Jacob Bernoulli (dummy edit)
• 21:4021:40, 30 June 2017 diff hist +187 User talk:174.3.155.181 just asking if i will be banned again if i request arbitration (due process) wrt baseless reversions (w/ no substantive defense) of my edits that showed James Gregory influenced Isaac Barrow "bigly" lol ("it's true, it's damn true"-Kurt Angle)
• 21:3421:34, 30 June 2017 diff hist +69 User talk:174.3.155.181 →and the commons yelled...: new section

30 December 2016

• 22:3022:30, 30 December 2016 diff hist +18,108 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests Undid revision 757355592 by Callanecc (talk) well, I mind. Please let participants respond before eagerly reverting. I couldn't respond for reasons I've mentioned in the response

29 December 2016

• 19:5619:56, 29 December 2016 diff hist +10,933 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests →Experiencing continual abuse by administrators who defend uninformed editors as a consequence of my argumentativeness and steadfast adherence to the TRUTH: new section

28 December 2016

• 01:3601:36, 28 December 2016 diff hist +19 Philosophy of law surprised to see that sir francis is omitted as a notable philosopher of law; adding. requesting those who disagree to consult law section of his bio (considered by some as "father of modern jurisprudence")

27 December 2016

• 23:5423:54, 27 December 2016 diff hist −343 Democritus Undid revision 756969979 by 174.3.155.181 (talk) :) Tag: references removed
• 23:5423:54, 27 December 2016 diff hist +343 Democritus "...essential(...) to impress upon men that violent motion (which we call mechanical, & Democritus, who in explaining his first motions is to be ranked even below mediocre philosophers,called the motion of the blow)" PWNT by sir francis

19 December 2016

• 23:1223:12, 19 December 2016 diff hist −18 Robert Filmer Undid revision 755746860 by 174.3.155.181 (talk)
• 23:1223:12, 19 December 2016 diff hist +18 Robert Filmer showin' our giga johnny love for straight bodying Filmer for 100pgs str8, over 300 yrs ago,TIL HE THE LAST MFER SCRIBIN'

17 December 2016

• 04:4704:47, 17 December 2016 diff hist +289 Thomson problem fixing deadlink to Sir JJ's paper that seems to provide the mathematical basis for result. wonder if georgie and [[fourth baron got dem Depends handy. y'all feelin' us yet or wat? 1 centy and sir JJ still fresh

26 July 2016

• 21:4321:43, 26 July 2016 diff hist +741 User talk:174.3.155.181 jeez, User:Ohnoitsjamie really knows how to have fun, eh dr eppstein? lol, all the characteristics of "life of the party". no wonder he's a wikipedia admin! one-to-one correspondence Constantin Carathéodory-styles lol ;)
• 17:4917:49, 26 July 2016 diff hist −368 User talk:174.3.155.181 No edit summary
• 03:5503:55, 26 July 2016 diff hist −124 User talk:174.3.155.181 Undid revision 731559619 by David Eppstein (talk) i've asked why the new references are insufficient and have not received any proper answer. i do not understand what is disruptive...
• 03:5403:54, 26 July 2016 diff hist +1,574 Isaac Barrow Undid revision 731559272 by Sro23 (talk) can i please get a reason as to why new references provided are insufficient? they are new additions that i found when bolstering the original claim. thanks.
• 03:5003:50, 26 July 2016 diff hist +78 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard "take chances, make mistakes!!" - Miss Frizzle (from the Magic School Bus), Davy boy! ;)
• 03:4703:47, 26 July 2016 diff hist −1,390 User talk:174.3.155.181 Undid revision 731558505 by David Eppstein (talk) not really. no one has engaged, originator of the reversion motivating RfC gave no evidence to counter claim while i provided multiple.
• 03:4403:44, 26 July 2016 diff hist +1,574 Isaac Barrow Undid revision 731558315 by David Eppstein (talk) instead of reverting, why not engage & tell me what is lacking in rigour of references? nothing has been stated regarding this at all
• 01:1801:18, 26 July 2016 diff hist −1,032 Alfred North Whitehead it is debatable whether this individual was a student at all. sources (https://books.google.ca/books?id=sMffGQKgJ9EC&pg=PA41) also say his thesis has remained unpublished. regardless, the individual is unfortunately not notable enough for insertion. sorry

25 July 2016

• 23:4123:41, 25 July 2016 diff hist +1,542 Isaac Barrow Undid revision 731527555 by 174.3.155.181 re-adding w/ stronger refs that synergise the original ("contested") one. if administrators punctuate my inactivity-vow due to my steadfast adherence to EVIDENCE, so be it..
• 23:0423:04, 25 July 2016 diff hist +1,375 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard wikipedia is now a site where evidence is subservient to the "opinions" of non-experts who comment on topics necessitating expertise. outrageous.
• 22:4822:48, 25 July 2016 diff hist −451 Isaac Barrow Undid revision 731356242 by 174.3.155.181 (talk) feels weird leaving this up when the editors aren't even reading evidence & making decisions on a whim. this site officially sucks. peace.
• 22:4622:46, 25 July 2016 diff hist +1,320 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard response.
• 20:4120:41, 25 July 2016 diff hist +43 Theorema Egregium providing link to first translation of Gauss' "General Investigations of Curved Surfaces of 1827 and 1825", commenting out second translation due to redundancy, rm'ing Morehead/Hiltebeitel trans as it is first ref. also homogenising the references.
• 20:2220:22, 25 July 2016 diff hist 0 Theorema Egregium 2x Karl->Carl. homogenise, homogenise, homogenise, laddies!
• 19:4119:41, 25 July 2016 diff hist −151 P versus NP problem Undid revision 731392013 by 2602:301:77A8:1030:A166:E50F:476E:5607 (talk) not notable; user:david eppstein's removal is appropriate
• 18:5418:54, 25 July 2016 diff hist +277 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard →RfC close review please
• 18:4118:41, 25 July 2016 diff hist +2,130 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard response. thanks for the heads up User:S Marshall
• 00:1400:14, 25 July 2016 diff hist +1,295 User talk:S Marshall adding another source providing one of Isaac Barrow and James Gregory's many exchanges, again where the latter expresses massive amounts of respect for the former. arguably enough to put Isaac Barrow as an influence for Gregory, too! TEAM work

24 July 2016

• 22:4922:49, 24 July 2016 diff hist −1 Bohr model Undid revision 731284159 by 196.207.77.90 (talk) rvv
• 22:0322:03, 24 July 2016 diff hist −120 Gaussian function Undid revision 731018046 by 114.205.211.151 (talk)
• 21:1621:16, 24 July 2016 diff hist +121 User talk:S Marshall fixing recent insertion
• 21:1521:15, 24 July 2016 diff hist +965 User talk:S Marshall just adding a few more sources for User:S Marshall to peruse, so that this decision can be made with some finality.
• 21:0121:01, 24 July 2016 diff hist +1,855 Talk:Isaac Barrow brief response. i am not reverting and expecting the edit to stay. rather, i am leaving it there until User:S Marshall and i have a discussion about what else would be needed (if anything), if the current evidence is not as strong as *he* would like.
• 20:4320:43, 24 July 2016 diff hist +451 Isaac Barrow Undid revision 731355880 by Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) no, User:S Marshall said he could not find consensus in the discussion below (where you voted & i didn't)
• 20:2820:28, 24 July 2016 diff hist +451 Isaac Barrow Undid revision 731070901 by S Marshall (talk) see your talk page. evidence is on par with what is used to support Isaac Barrow's influence on Isaac Newton, plus my vote was not taken.
• 20:2520:25, 24 July 2016 diff hist +277 Talk:Isaac Barrow verdict of RfC was not as claimed, and further i had not voted (but opposition had), with many abstains/impartial voters. leave it open.
• 20:1820:18, 24 July 2016 diff hist +6,655 User talk:S Marshall summarising "meat" of argument
• 20:0120:01, 24 July 2016 diff hist +1,638 User talk:S Marshall →re: gregory's influence on barrow: new section

23 July 2016

• 21:4621:46, 23 July 2016 diff hist +3,147 Mind–body problem adding two translated sources for my giga 'stotle's De Anima (Eugene Gendlin Robert Drew Hicks) BOTH implying that "the mind is a faculty of the soul", where soul is distinguished from nous (which corresponds to the mind)

21 July 2016

• 23:3723:37, 21 July 2016 diff hist +47 Separable space adding wl for separable σ-algebra
• 22:0022:00, 21 July 2016 diff hist +149 Cramér–Wold theorem removing "proof" section & citing billingsley in statement. adding a few more categories and wikilinks.