Talk:International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
Church Rock and Santa Susana
Why is there no mention of Church Rock uranium mill spill or the meltdown of the Sodium Reactor Experiment at the Santa Susana Field Laboratory? Church Rock was at least level 4 if not 5. It released more radiation than Three Mile Island. Randall Bart Talk
- This isn't intended to be an exhaustive list; some examples are given. Incidentally, if either of those accidents was ever assigned an INES rating, it doesn't appear to be listed in either article. VQuakr (talk) 01:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on International Nuclear Event Scale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110413145944/http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/12_05.html to http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/12_05.html
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.ujv.gov.si/nc/en/splosno/cns/news/article/12088/5400/ - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://200.0.198.11/comunicados/18_12_2006.pdf - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www-news.iaea.org/news/topics/topic/erfs/erf/default.asp?VersionNum=1&TopicID=660 - Corrected formatting/usage for http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/INES-2009_web.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:57, 15 November 2017 (UTC)