User talk:Bamnamu
Many thanks for your expansion here! The article has been rather pitiful, and there is still a lot to do. Is there any chance of you adding more? It's not an area I am familiar with. Johnbod (talk) 00:59, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you! You're absolutely right about the state of the article. Thanks for your contributions to it as well. I plan on adding more to the article eventually, but not at the moment. Bamnamu (talk) 04:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Sorry about that. This is indeed part of a quote. 85.193.218.178 (talk) 16:43, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- No need to apologize. Cheers! Bamnamu (talk) 18:11, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Bamnamu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Vandalism in the article, Goguryeo Need help
Hello
I am here to ask you for some help. In fact, I'm asking the same thing to several other administrators about the same matter at hand. About four months ago, the article Goguryeo has been protected due to vandalism, disruptive editing, and edit warring. After a couple of weeks after the protection was broken, two new editors started to vandalize the same article. To introduce you to the situation: they edited out the statements to misrepresent the cited sources, multiple credited sources were entirely removed, and original research has been included to substitute the removal. The two editor(s) in question are: User:Zanhe and User:Koraskadi I have been reverting the article back to the last editorial completed by User:Failosopher since the breakout of the situation.
The content that has been subject to this event are these two qualities:
1- "Goguryeo (고구려; 高句麗; [ko.ɡu.ɾjʌ], 37 BCE–668 CE), also called Goryeo (고려; 高麗; [ko.ɾjʌ]), was a Korean kingdom[4][5][6]"
The two editors mentioned above are constantly removing the bolded word; which goes against these three supporting articles cited.
"Koguryo". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved October 15, 2013.
States that Goguryeo as one of the three Kingdoms of Korea
Byeon, Tae-seop (1999) 韓國史通論 (Outline of Korean history), 4th ed, Unknown Publisher, ISBN 89-445-9101-6.
Emphasizes Goguryeo as one of the most powerful Korean State that arose throughout history
"Complex of Koguryo Tombs". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Retrieved 2013-10-24.
The current article simply talks about its geographical location. However, the article stated that Goguryeo was Korean when it was retrieved.
2- "Goguryeo has been described as an empire by many scholars", "Goguryeo was a powerful empire and one of the great powers in East Asia"
Phrases in relation to the bolded word are getting removed alongside their supporting citations. This is a completely clear example of vandalism.
신형식 (2003). 高句麗史. Ewha Womans University Press. p. 56. ISBN 9788973005284. Retrieved 12 September 2017.
이덕일; 박찬규 (2007). 고구려 는 천자 의 제국 이었다. 역사의아침. ISBN 9788995884973. Retrieved 12 September 2017.
Roberts, John Morris; Westad, Odd Arne. The History of the World. Oxford University Press. p. 443. ISBN 9780199936762. Retrieved 15 July 2016.
Gardner, Hall. Averting Global War: Regional Challenges, Overextension, and Options for American Strategy. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 158–159. ISBN 9780230608733. Retrieved 15 July 2016.
Laet, Sigfried J. de. History of Humanity: From the seventh to the sixteenth century. UNESCO. p. 1133. ISBN 9789231028137. Retrieved 10 October 2016.
Walker, Hugh Dyson. East Asia: A New History. AuthorHouse. pp. 6–7. ISBN 9781477265178. Retrieved 20 November 2016
All these sources explicitly describe Goguryeo as an empire or have been described to have developed into an empire. In fact, the main thesis of the first two articles is about Goguryeo being an Empire. The same sources also state that Goguryeo is Korean, but they were not cited for the quality mentioned above for the current editorial.
The editorial that I have been reverting back into was the protected version; which was constructed by a series of discussions and debates with various editors and administrators including us. Something has to be done about the vandalists or the article in question. For the greater good, I ask you for your help once again, but I will decrease the burden by asking many others. Thank you. Wandrative (talk) 17:49, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
The Korean "clan"s didn't came from other country. Only "people" and "surname"s came from other country. Thanks. --Garam (talk) 11:23, 18 February 2018 (UTC)