Talk:Lazarus (comics)

Lazarus (comics) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 14, 2017	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
October 13, 2017	Good article nominee	Listed
October 13, 2017	Good article nominee	Listed
May 30, 2018	Featured article candidate	Promoted
Current status: Featured article

Comics FA‑class Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics
FA	This article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction FA‑class Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
FA	This article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lazarus (comics)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TriiipleThreat (talk · contribs) 18:07, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will be reviewing this article, please be patient as I make my initial pass. Thank you.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:07, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Very well written. One minor quibble; names that are introduced in lead should probably be re-introduced in the body.
I added first names for Rucka and Lark. Those were the only two, right? Argento Surfer (talk) 12:36, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Also I know its stated in the infobox but is there anyway to clarify in the lead that the series is still ongoing. For some reason, I just assumed it was completed so the word tense in the production section threw me off at first.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:59, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Does this work? Argento Surfer (talk) 14:20, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I made some tweaks as well.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 14:28, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
Did not verify every claim but random spot checks show no original research. Earwig's Copyvio Detector shows a remarkable 10.7% likely violation.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Although not GA dependent, I suggest adding a "Characters" section with sourced descriptions. If not, no worries.
I'm not opposed to this, but I'll need to re-read the series before I can start on it. Aside from two, maybe three of the characters, I doubt I'll be able to find anything but primary sources for the descriptions. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:36, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Like I said, no biggie.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:59, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
File:Lazarus promotional image.jpg has FUR but the comparison between Lark's promotional image and his published artwork is not present in the article.
I didn't add a direct comparison, but I did incorporate more comments to highlight the changes that are present. When I added it, I was intending the user to use the images to see the comparison him/herself. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:36, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Then you may wish to change the FUR to more accurately represent what is in the article.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:59, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Argento Surfer (talk) 14:07, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Kudos to Argento Surfer on a well-written, comprehensive, reliably sourced article on a topic I knew little about. I'd be interested to see what becomes of the Amazon adaptation.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 14:28, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lazarus (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:29, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]