User talk:Yankees10

Archives

---

1. 2006
2. January 2007–June 2007
3. July 2007–December 2007
4. January 2008–June 2008
5. July 2008–December 2008
6. January 2009–June 2009
7. July 2009–December 2009
8. January 2010–June 2010
9. July 2010–December 2010
10. January 2011–June 2011
11. July 2011–December 2011
12. January 2012–June 2012
13. July 2012–2015
14. 2016

Proposed deletion of Bo Scarbrough

The article Bo Scarbrough has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not come close to satisfying either WP:COLLATH, WP:NGRIDIRON or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 05:12, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

If this is brought to AfD, see the article's talk page. That should cover it. Lizard (talk) 06:01, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

We should delete this article, surely he'll never amount to anything. Lizard (talk) 02:24, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Marcus Williams (safety) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marcus Williams (safety) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcus Williams (safety) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:30, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

User talk:Yankees10 Regarding Bengie Molina Article Revision

Hello, thanks for your help with my revision to the Bengie Molina article. As he was awarded the Willie Mac Award, I am simply curious as to why the revision was made to delete the addition to a category, which I had created, where none currently exists and likely should? I am hoping you could help answer this, for my own curiosity, thanks.

Mark Halsey 19:08, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Mark Halsey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markhalsey (talk • contribs)

Barry Stokes (American football)

Lol. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 03:46, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Certainly notable. Who could forget his 1999 season with the Claymores? Lizard (talk) 03:55, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

All-Pro

Shouldn't we get some consensus for what All-Pro teams to list in the infoboxes and All-Pro pages. The recent articles (ex. 2015 All-Pro Team) have Pro Football Focus in the lead but the PFF team isn't actually listed. Someone removed them. I'm not sure what qualifies and what doesn't. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 01:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Yeah definitely. There shouldn't be any inconsistencies with these.--Yankees10 09:31, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

How do we decide though? WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 14:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

This gets confusing on which to include or not just like the with the college football All-American teams. Personally if it was up to me i'd just stick with AP, PFWA and SN and not include PFF. PFF doesn't get the wide recognition yet as the others.--Yankees10 18:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

I had added PFF a few months ago, based on what Pro-Football-Reference lists, then some IP came around claiming there was consensus not to include PFF years ago, but I never found that consensus. But I did find that the NFLPA collective bargaining agreement in 2011 (see page 101) recognized the AP, PFWA/PFWA, Sporting News, and Sports Illustrated as "veteran media". This seems to be what the "consensus" decided, but I've never seen Sports Illustrated listed. Lizard (talk) 18:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

I think you meant to say PFW/PFWA. Yh, I don't see Pro Football Weekly included either. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 19:30, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

PFW and PFWA are basically the same. Pro Football Weekly is published by the PFWA I think. Lizard (talk) 19:47, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Cook

I thought the navboxes were only for regular season. This is a rare case indeed. What shall we do? WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 21:35, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

He should be there as he did start. We could add a # sign and say that it was a postseason start, however I'm not sure we should be taking up space in the template for that.--Yankees10 21:42, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

I didn't think we included postseason before. Joe Webb just has (2010), he's missing the playoff start in 2012. I guess in the case of Osweiler and Savage, it doesn't really matter which one says "present" though. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 21:45, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

I think Dissident normally deals with these. Lizard (talk) 21:47, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

For the Raiders starting quarterback navbox? We have Matt Cassel as a "starter" for the Bills in 2015, due to him taking the first snap of the season in a trick play. But on the other hand, the NFL does not officially include postseason starts as part of a player's career start total, so if we follow how they do it, Cook shouldn't belong. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 00:22, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

• It wouldn't be a big deal if we included postseason because cases like Webb and Cook are very few. Most people who start a playoff game started at least one regular season game that year too. And a lot of the QB lists on here have the postseason starters. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 22:15, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Raiders starting quarterbacks template

Connor Cook IS NOT considered a starting quarterback yet because he did not start in the regular season. He did make a start in the postseason, but he is not considered a starting quarterback on the team. -MON5T3ER (RoyalsLife) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RoyalsLife (talk • contribs) 21:00, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

La O

I think his last name is just La O (you can move it back if u disagree) and Yander part of his first/middle name. Weirdest name ever! We'll know more when he gets a MLB.com page/see alpha order. 24.162.134.57 (talk) 05:27, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

U can see in the body of this article refer to him as La O but the accompanying video is too fuzzy to see his last name on the back of his jersey. Ur opinion? 24.162.134.57 (talk) 05:37, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

His B-R page lists him as Luis Yander (Camacho) Yander. I'm confused. 24.162.134.57 (talk) 05:46, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Could Yander be part of his first/middle name and last name!! 24.162.134.57 (talk) 05:57, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

U can see here de la O last name. But can't find just La O. 24.162.134.57 (talk) 06:14, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

"We'll probably find out that he's actually going by his third cousin's name and is 3 years older anyways." -An insightful comment someone left here. Lizard (talk) 06:53, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

These Cuban names can get real confusing sometimes. I won't make any changes until he gets an MLB.com page.--Yankees10 07:08, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

He is officialy signed. Listed as Luis La O. I guess Yander is his middle name. 24.162.134.57 (talk) 16:13, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

References

Unreal

I can't wait for the season to be over. I've never seen vandalism that heavy. This is what I imagine the edit history on Trump's page would be like if it was unprotected for 30 minutes. Lizard (talk) 02:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

I wish we had a football editor admin that would right away be able to protect the page instead of having to wait until the nonsense gets this far.--Yankees10 03:03, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

I've been letting them hear it. Wikipedia talk:Requests for page protection#1,276 admins. As expected, they avoided the actual problem and went off into admin-speak. Lizard (talk) 03:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Here's all the admins in WP:NFL: User:BU Rob13, User:Cbl62, User:Cholmes75, User:Eagles247, User:Go Phightins!, User:Gonzo_fan2007, User:Jayron32, User:Rlendog, User:VegaDark, User:Wizardman, User:Zzyzx11. And I may have missed some. I hope you don't mind me pinging all of them, because they need to be aware of what happens when a player gets called for holding in a playoff game. Lizard (talk) 05:14, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

I'm home now, so I'm grabbing some of these. When I got this ping (and a couple others), I was on a bus home from Wikipedia Day NYC and on mobile only, so I couldn't do much. We need more admins, badly, but few editors on the "front lines" are running. We've done a better job recruiting niche editors or long-time content creators as admin candidates in the past month, but we're still struggling to get counter-vandalism editors to run for and pass RfA. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

My intentions were mainly to point out that we had 11 admins in WP:NFL, and to suggest that at least one of them be on standby next week for the conference championships. The vandalism was insane this week, it'll be worse next week. WP:RFPP has been criminally slow lately; protection coming three hours later isn't gonna cut it. We need an admin who could respond immediately when vandalism on a page goes haywire. Lizard (talk) 06:32, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

@Yankees10: Have you ever considered running? You have the tenure, the edits, the experience, a clean block log (for at least seven years), and, in my experience, the temperament. I haven't the time to do a full review, but I would encourage you to submit your name here to potentially get some feedback and throw your hat in the ring. Anyway, with regard to this specific issue, I am well aware of the amount of vandalism that can happen on articles when a subject does something noteworthy (or not, in this case). It's one of the reasons I hate the MLB Trade Deadline. But, it's the price we pay for being an encyclopedia that anyone can edit. I'd encourage following up on the proposals discussed at WP:RFPP about noting BLPs and the number of edits made recently. I can try to be available at least for some of next Sunday evening. Go Phightins! 15:14, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

I'm not sure I'd want to be one. It would be nice for situations like this, but i'm not sure sure i'm interested in the other responsibilities.--Yankees10 18:12, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Tyler Krieger) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Tyler Krieger, Yankees10!

Wikipedia editor Hydronium Hydroxide just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Does not appear to meet WP:NBASEBALL, but will provided he plays in the WBC in March, so close enough for the moment.

To reply, leave a comment on Hydronium Hydroxide's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 09:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Pro Bowl

Does being a Pro Bowler even mean anything. Like 75% of the league gets invited lol. Just looking looking at the AFC QBs, 13 out of the 16 teams could have had their starter be a Pro Bowler. The following list is in order of passing yards.

• Philip Rivers (accepted invite)
• Joe Flacco (not sure he had an invite but why not, he had the 2nd most yards in the AFC, not like Siemian's numbers are way better)
• Andrew Luck (declined invite due to injury)
• Andy Dalton (accepted invite)
• Derek Carr (selected on ballot but injured and will not play)
• Blake Bortles (same as Flacco, not like Siemian's numbers are way better)
• Ben Roethlisberger (selected on ballot but injured and will not play)
• Tom Brady (selected but team is in Super Bowl)
• Alex Smith (accepted invite)
• Marcus Mariota (injured before Pro Bowl invites started, so he could not have been invited unless he was selected on the original ballot, his numbers are way better than Siemian's)
• Trevor Siemian (declined invite due to surgery)
• Tyrod Taylor (declined invite due to surgery)
• Ryan Tannehill (injured like Mariota, and not like his numbers are that much different from Taylor or Siemian, Tannehill's might be better since he played in fewer games)
• Ryan Fitzpatrick (no invite, 12 TD 17 INT)
• Brock Osweiler (no invite, 15 TD 16 INT)
• Browns QBs (no invite)

For the record, the NFC side isn't as bad. The five players currently listed on the 2017 Pro Bowl page are the only ones who were invited as far as I can tell. The AFC had too many declined invites and injuries. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 18:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

It's so bad. I haven't watched it in years. Where living in a world where two Pro Bowl quarterbacks threw 15 (Alex Smith) and 18 touchdowns (Dalton). Those numbers wouldn't even have gotten you in the Pro Bowl in the 1970's when they were throwing the ball only 25 times a game. In today's pass happy NFL those numbers are embarrassing...and they're in the damn Pro Bowl.--Yankees10 18:59, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Bridgewater last year was worse. 14 TDs, 9 INTs, lol. Also, Dalton's numbers were way better last year and he didn't make the team. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 19:03, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Oh god, I forgot Bridgewater made it. Atrocious. And somehow Stafford's 2011 (5,038, 41 touchdowns) wasn't good enough.--Yankees10 19:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

As ironically an IP just falsely added that he did make it to his infobox.--Yankees10 19:10, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Weird lol. Also, the bad thing is people look at Pro Bowls and automatically think it's an accomplishment. It is for the players on the original ballot most of the time. But some of the replacement's don't deserve it. But when people look back at their careers, they say stuff like "Pro Bowl QB Teddy Bridgewater" and they might not realize he only made the team because 10 people declined invites or were injured. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 19:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Exactly. It's a meaningless honor at this point. Maybe it meant something at one time, but now its so watered down and useless.--Yankees10 19:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Friendly reminder that Vince Young has as many Pro Bowls as John Riggins and Ray Nitschke combined. Lizard (talk) 20:17, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

@WikiOriginal-9: Check out LT's non-Pro Bowl season in 2003. Lizard (talk) 13:57, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

That was his 100 receptions season no less.--Yankees10 18:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

If they picked before the final game like they do now, the voters missed that 243-yarder. But here were the AFC running backs that season: Jamal Lewis who had over 2,000 yards, Priest Holmes who scored 27 rushing touchdowns, and Clinton Portis who had almost the same rushing yards as LT but played 3 less games. Also it didn't help that the Charges went 4–12. Lizard (talk) 18:32, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Interesting. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 21:30, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

"Advanced metrics"

Is this supposed to be football's sabermetrics? Most of this stuff is Greek to me and has no value to the average reader. That one guy's getting annoying. I always wonder what goes through an editor's mind when all their edits get reverted and they truck along continuing to make the same edits. Are they oblivious? Do they just not care? It's one of the great mysteries of the human race. Lizard (talk) 23:22, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

I'm always amazed at that too. You think they'd get the hint. But no I guess.--Yankees10 23:38, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

i agree. advanced metrics are more sophisticated stats akin to sabermetrics. i'm personally interested in collaborating with User:Lizard the Wizard and User:Yankees10 to incorporate remarkable info into wikipedia's pro football player pages only when the information is noteworthy or newsworthy, particularly interesting to the average fan, and includes a trustworthy source reference. i see User:Lizard the Wizard and User:Yankees10 are doing an excellent job curating many of the pro football player pages. i love wikipedia and i love football stats. is there a specific protocol that i can follow to contribute to these pages while ensuring my work is not reverted by an established page curator?

i also noticed a reversion comment questioning playerprofiler as a source. i have yet to encounter an incorrect stat on one of the playerprofiler pages and believe it has become the authoritative source for many interesting stats and metrics such as catch radius, deep ball accuracy, yards after contact, etc. unlike much of sabermetrics, i believe many football metrics are straightforward concepts that are consumable and interesting to the average reader. for example, i believe many patriots fans would be interested to know that dion lewis leads the nfl in evaded tackles per touch over the last two seasons. also, for wikipedia users interested in learning more about football advanced metrics, i found this link, which lays out the origin and current source of numerous advanced stats: https://www.playerprofiler.com/terms-glossary/.-Mkelley78

I'll respond on your talk page, Mkelley. Lizard (talk) 05:00, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Templates

Hey, i always thought pro over college? Am i wrong? If yes (any guideline?), i am sorry. (Current roster should still be the first template). Kante4 (talk) 18:07, 1 February 2017 (UTC) Kante4 (talk) 18:07, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Well college comes first so that's why they are always listed as the top. As far as rosters going at the top, I've never seen that as being mandatory. It's usually the first or last depending on the article. Personally I don't care either way.--Yankees10 18:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Sure, that's logical. But pro is, yeah like ahead of college. That's why i thought it should be at the top. But ok if i'm wrong. Kante4 (talk) 18:15, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

You're technically not wrong. I'm really just going based off what i've seen on other articles for consistency reasons, and most have it in this order. There's never been a formal discussion, as far as I know, about what order they should be in (and there probably shouldn't be considering how minor of an issue this is).--Yankees10 18:22, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Agree. Sorry if i caused any problems. Kante4 (talk) 18:23, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Don't be. There's zero problems here. Keep up the good work with the Packers articles.--Yankees10 18:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. Kante4 (talk) 20:47, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Are you ready?

We should do prop bets with vandalism tonight. Over/under 10 instances of a player being another player's "daddy." Over/under 3 different players being the "GOAT." How many seconds between the first big hit of the game and the player who was tackled having their death_date field filled out? Lizard (talk) 20:07, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Wasn't as bad as I thought, except Malcolm Butler (American football). Single-handedly battled an idiot on that page for like 15 minutes. Lizard (talk) 06:38, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Was pleasantly surprised when I came to my watchlist after the game and the damage wasn't too bad. I thought Dan Quinn's article for sure was gonna be ugly, shocked that it didn't even have to be protected.--Yankees10 19:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Roger Clemens

Thanks for correcting me on the Toby Keith/Paul Wall sentence. I really should have put that in the sandbox and looked at it first. It wasn't very notable, I was just overthinking it.[[D-free]] (talk) 10:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks

For this. I've been dealing with this since the name change, and before that I'd been reverting people saying Johnny Unitas' jersey is retired by the Baltimore Colts. I wish they'd take a second to actually think about how it makes no sense for the jersey of a team that no longer exists to be retired. Technically every Baltimore Colts jersey is retired. Lizard (talk) 18:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

He did it again but I'm too close to 3RR. Lizard (talk) 01:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Alex Reyes

I'm not understanding your objection to having a line mentioning and linking to the other players who have had Tommy John surgery. besides Alex Reyes. If the additional information is accurate, not contentious and contains a wiki link, why do you feel the arbitrary need to remove the line, in the quote below? Could you possibly explain the reasoning or rule that has you so upset that it can't be there for those who want to see the listing? There are those who wonder if he is unusual in having it as a rookie and only 22, so the link gives them direct access to the list. That's the reason why I included it, so I hope it will explain and refute your unusual objection in smearing it ("this is silly", "still no reason to have this") as you did in your comments, which I thought was out-of-line for such an innocent addition. I would appreciate it if you would reassess your arbitrary deletion and re-add it. Thanks. "He is among many other players who have had the surgical procedure." Oye289 (talk) 05:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

If I may ask, what makes his removal of said link any more arbitrary than your addition of it? If it wasn't there to begin with, doesn't that make its absence the default, and thus its inclusion "arbitrary"? Lizard (talk) 05:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your point is illogical for a reason for anyone to ever add anything to an existing article, by your definition of arbitrary. On the other hand, deletion of something added should be only for a solidly valid reason such as inaccuracy or invalid source. Oye289 (talk) 19:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

It's oddly placed and really doesn't add much. Would work better in a "See also" section.--Yankees10 07:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

I don't see it the way you do as "oddly placed" or somehow a wrongful addition of information. However, I am glad to see you suggest an alternate way (that you won't delete) that I did not see, which is just another way of adding that same information that you initially objected to. Oye289 (talk) 19:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Teddy Bridgewater

I referenced Bridgewater's college QBR (a popular QB efficiency metric) and included a link to the QBR wiki page to provide additional context. I am investing significant time into contributing interesting information, and try to be self aware, but here I don't see where/how I err'd. I sincerely concerned about wasting time and energy while simultaneously creating work for you... Can you briefly explain why the contribution was reverted?Mkelley78 (talk) 15:13, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

This stuff isn't notable that's why it's being removed. And that website is not a good source. All it is is a knockoff of Pro Football Focus and shouldn't be used.--Yankees10 17:42, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

I respectfully disagree with this opinion. For example, QBR is widely used by ESPN and is considered noteworthy to many mainstream sports media members and Wikipedia users. Additionally, PlayerProfiler, like Pro Football Focus, is widely considered a trusted data source by advanced stats aficionados. I believe discrediting it as knockoff is unfair as I have been using the site for years and have yet to find unverifiable/inaccurate data. Furthermore, Pro Football Focus does not make it's data publicly available, so it cannot be referenced, and is therefore not a true comparison. For this reason, I believe PlayerProfiler deserved more mention on Wikipedia, not less. What more can I do to help to ensure that my contributions that reference PlayerProfiler are not removed in the future? Mkelley78 (talk) 16:57, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Ruth

This interesting article is no doubt retrosheet's basis.--Wehwalt (talk) 21:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Interesting though I think we should still keep it based on what MLB's official website says.--Yankees10 01:12, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

season → annual

I'm thinking of moving all the NFL's seasonal leader lists from "List of National Football League season xxxx leaders" to "List of National Football League annual xxxx leaders." Not only because it's consistent with how the NBA and MLB do it, but it's also awkward wording. You wouldn't say "he was the NFL's season rushing yards leader five times," but you might say "he was the NFL's annual rushing yards leader five times." Figured I'd consult with you since you created a few of the pages and templates for the NFL. And then we'd need to go fix the names in those template and stuff. Lizard (talk) 20:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Sounds good to me.--Yankees10 21:36, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Kinda torn on what to do with List of National Football League rushing champions. While they are considered "rushing champions" it might be better to name it "List of National Football League annual rushing yards leaders," for consistency and recognizability. Lizard (talk) 02:52, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Yeah I'd stick with "annual" for those reasons.--Yankees10 03:04, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Joe Jiménez

I think Joe Jiménez needs to be moved to Joe Jiménez (pitcher) because there's another article of a golfer with the same name but without the accent in the E. Seriesphile (talk · ctb) 00:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

There is only one baseball player with the name Joe Jiménez so pitcher isn't necessary and the other Jimenez doesn't have an accent so I disagree.--Yankees10 01:21, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

"Off-season and/or practice squad member only"

Do any other projects besides the NFL list off-season teams in the infobox? I can't find any examples. Lizard (talk) 00:10, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

None others as far as I know. Baseball certainly doesn't it.--Yankees10 01:02, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wendell Carter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Power forward. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Be my friend MonkeyPanda1 (talk) 19:07, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Deleting external web links

I am the manager for NFL linebacker Dekoda Watson and I updated is Wikipedia page to have links to his Facebook and instagram profile. But those links were deleted and it appears you made the last edit to the page. I am looking on visibility into why this change was made? En tourage01 (talk) 19:24, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Technically, according to a policy (that I can't think of the name of), social media links are not supposed to be used in articles. Though I have seen them added and removed by numerous different people, so i'm not 100% sure.--Yankees10 19:43, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft info in intro

There is no need to have it in the header, you already have it in the infobox and also inside the article text. The header should give you a quick idea of the article, not the whole story Tecmo (talk) 01:41, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Willy Adames for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Willy Adames is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willy Adames until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:33, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Dalton Pompey

Thanks for the catch. I guess I wasn't paying enough attention. --rogerd (talk) 23:22, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

No problem.--Yankees10 23:33, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

What happened here?

[1]. You had it right the first time with Biletnikoff. Lizard (talk) 16:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

They apparently changed their minds and gave it to Andruzzi [2]. Belitnikoff is not listed on their website's list of winners [3] I tried finding their reasoning for changing but couldn't find anything.--Yankees10 16:49, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Wow that's really weird. Lizard (talk) 17:31, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) I found a couple of pages listing them as co-winners for 2015: [4] [5] And they gave the award to each of them, per the ceremony videos at [6] and [7] (on the Andruzzi video, the host and Andruzzi both mention that there are two awardees). Why the website award page currently lists only one winner, I don't know.--Arxiloxos (talk) 18:35, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

That makes sense. I can't imagine they'd just outright change their mind after awarding it, unless they rescinded it, which doesn't seem to be the case. Lizard (talk) 19:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

LT

This stupidity is what that IP keeps adding to LT's page to try to make a point that he played for the Chargers when they were in San Diego. Check the page history over the past few months. Yet another idiot who can't come to grips that a number can't be retired for a team that no longer exists. Lizard (talk) 16:31, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

And of course the idiot does it again.--Yankees10 00:38, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Recent Reversions

I had a great back and forth with User:Lizard_the_Wizard on my talk page regarding the general content restrictions enacted by NFL player page curators, and I have been following those guidelines above and beyond Wikipedia's general guidelines. To my dismay, I noticed a flurry of reversions rolling back many hours of notation work. I would appreciate it you could take a look at my talk page and respond with a general explanation for the reversions.Mkelley78 (talk) 20:34, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

None of the info you add is notable and the source is not reliable.--Yankees10 20:38, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

After significant due diligence on PlayerProfiler, I concluded it is reliable. Have you read objections to its citation? Have you encountered significant inaccuracies on the site? Regarding your second objection, the information reverted such as yards after the catch is both relatable to casual sports fans and noteworthy to more sophisticated sports information consumers.

The recent reversions conflict with wikipedia's stated reversion guidelines. These guidelines ensure that editors such as myself are not demoralized and driven off the platform by having their hard work deleted by others based on acute notion of relevancy or arbitrary notion of reliability: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Revert_only_when_necessary

Communication is the key to avoiding conflict per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_warring. Please engage me on my talk page before making a reversion as I am always happy to talk about the content I'm providing to ensure that it resonates as much as possible with wikipedia readers.Mkelley78 (talk) 20:57, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

You do a great service culling false information, opinions lacking citation, and original research from this platform, and you recently reverted one of my contributions deeming it not something the average person would find interesting. Wikipedia's mission is not to create an average information source, and as cited above, the documented standards for reverting contributions are higher than one editor's opinion of the average reader's sophistication and preferences. I will continue to strive to enhance the information on football player performances available on this platform. Mkelley78 (talk) 14:14, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

I have reviewed your recent reversions and concluded my contributions were noteworthy, relevant, and consumable to a wide audience. Beyond this point, your general reasoning for the original reversion conflicts with Wikipedia's stated reversion guidelines. Mkelley78 (talk) 19:05, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Rangel Ravelo listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rangel Ravelo. Since you had some involvement with the Rangel Ravelo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Spanneraol (talk) 22:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

whz are you reverting the listings at RfD

please explain sharpish. Discuss at WP:RFD please, don't revert. Si Trew (talk) 23:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

You placed a PROD tag on an article that has already been nominated for deletion and kept. You can't do that.--Yankees10 23:52, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Kohl Stewart State Champion Deletion.

Why do you keep deleting about Kohl winning a State Championship? I was apart of that team and it should be apart of his highlights. HoustonAstrosFan97 (talk) 21:31, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Because the infobox isn't for useless minor things like that. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball/Player style advice.--Yankees10 22:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mike Strong (baseball)

The article Mike Strong (baseball) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable minor league baseball player

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spanneraol (talk) 23:42, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Yaz

Comments as to why you've deleted items from his infobox would be useful. I imagine you deem them minor accomplishments compared to the others, so I'm not immediately quibbling, but explicitly stating the reason would be appropriate. --John (User:Jwy/talk) 23:35, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

@Jwy: Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball/Player style advice.--Yankees10 23:47, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks - such a link in the comment of your update would be "a good thing." --John (User:Jwy/talk) 23:58, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

You're invited...

 Note: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#Navigation boxes in coaching articles (again) regarding the issue of whether or not the navboxes in coaching articles should be collapsed or stay as is. Please comment there and not here. Thanks, Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 22:47, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Team Colors

Hey, I was wondering if you knew how to add colors for a team? For example the St. Paul Saints have a color if you look at Mark Hamburger but teams in the Atlantic League don't have any and I want to add them in. Kingryan227 (Decrees • Acts) 20:28, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

@Kingryan227: Not sure, sorry. I'm sure somebody at WP:baseball knows how to.--Yankees10 20:39, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

new images

I see you have been active in editing Mohamed Bamba, DeAndre Ayton, Michael Porter Jr. and Wendell Carter, who played in the 2017 McDonald's All-American Boys Game. At Talk:2017 McDonald's All-American Boys Game, we are discussing the preferred images for use on WP for the MCD All-Americans.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:25, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Congrats! Buster Seven Talk 03:00, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Chad Kelly Mr. Irrelevant.

Why did you erase it? Basically all NFL players that were the last pick of the draft have the Mr. Irrelevant 'title' in the box description here in Wikipedia. I.e Kalan Reed, 2016 Mr Irrelevant: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalan_Reed; Gerald Christian, 2015 Mr. Irrelevant: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Christian. Etc, etc, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2804:431:D701:F708:B6A4:6F6D:7170:6D78 (talk) 22:23, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Because it's incredibly minor and hardly even notable.--Yankees10 22:41, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sam Rogers (fullback), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fullback. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Quick Question

I was just wondering if you and Muboshgu had my contributions on your watch list haha because it seems like everytime I make an edit y'all are literally right on my edits. Kingryan227 (Decrees • Acts) 01:06, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

I have 5,900 articles on my watchlist. Chances are a lot of the articles you edit are going to be on there.--Yankees10 01:21, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

John Ross

Regarding this, since when?? Do you have a link showing the consensus on the NFL project talkpage? I'm not upset I just want to see the proof that this is a consensus because I was unaware there was one.-Rockchalk717 04:40, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

I've been removing those as well. Subsections should be kept to a minimum. If a player only played for one team there's no reason to have a "Professional career" section and a team section. And the "Combine" section usually only contains one or two sentences. Lizard (talk) 05:39, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Yup, exactly what Lizard said here.--Yankees10 05:55, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Fair enough. Thank you both. I did not know we weren't doing that anymore. I will stop adding it and will remove them going forward if I come across them.--Rockchalk717 21:24, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Oi

I see you removing dates from infobox career award things, I've seen them being added but I'm unsure whether or not to remove them. Leggomygreggo8 (talk) 16:46, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Example of what you are referring to?--Yankees10 17:11, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Should I be removing dates like this [8]? If I see dates like this should I remove them? Leggomygreggo8 (talk) 18:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

You don't have to. I only removed them because I didn't find it necessary to add the years in this case. Had the user or another user reverted me, I wouldn't have removed it again.--Yankees10 18:38, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Juju Smith-Schuster

I'm still looking for the others. So relax. Toeknee44 (talk) 18:50, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Trevor Lawrence (American football)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Trevor Lawrence (American football) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Alexf505 (talk) 05:26, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomar Garciaparra

Why did you revert my edit of Garciaparra being World Series champion? He was with the Red Sox halfway thru the 2004 season and he has a WS ring so wouldn't that make him a WS champion? Smokiewight (talk) 00:30, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

No. A player has to have been on the WS roster for it to be in the infobox per WP:Baseball.--Yankees10 02:21, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of D. L. Hall

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on D. L. Hall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Alexf505 (talk) 03:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of D. L. Hall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article D. L. Hall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. L. Hall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alexf505 (talk) 03:47, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Orlando Cepeda

Yo, Yankees10, Orlando Cepeda was a seven-time All-Star, 1959-1964 and 1967. Please get informed with the following reference and leave my correction in place. http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/c/cepedor01.shtml Dave Peters (talk) 05:54, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

I explained in the edit summary why I reverted. There was two AS games from 1959 to 1962. That's how it's 11--Yankees10 05:25, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

I beg your pardon; you're quite right. After a little research, I see that the rosters were more or less identical for the "doubleheaders," so the entry in the third paragraph of the Cepeda Wiki claiming that "Cepeda was selected to play in seven Major League Baseball All-Star Games" is correct. Do you agree? Dave Peters (talk) 05:54, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Baseball player categories

Is there a set order for organizing player categories? I've noticed several articles of newly debuted players have their categories reshuffled after I added them in. Thank you! WNYY98 (talk) 01:59, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

@WNYY98: No, but my preference is birth year, living people, sportspeople/people from xxx, baseball players from state, position, MLB team, College team (if applicable) and then minor league teams in order of appearance. There's no set standard, but that's the way I usually order them.--Yankees10 02:04, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Drew Rasmussen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Drew Rasmussen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drew Rasmussen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:13, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Jose Altuve Deleted Info

Why did you delete about the fastest player in Astros history to get to 1,000 hits? It was a true fact about Altuve. Can you put it back?

Also why did you delete the stats too?

HoustonAstrosFan97 (talk) 03:12, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

You did not provide a reliable source backing up this info.--Yankees10 03:51, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Packers

Hey, I saw that you are listed as an active member of the Packers Wikiproject. I am interested in trying to push the Green Bay Packers main article to good article status. If you are interested, I would appreciate any help or advice that you are willing to give. I am sending this to all active members, so please reply to this proposal at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Green Bay Packers. Thanks! And go pack go ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 16:30, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Mark Langston, AL Rookie Pitcher of the Year

I see you reverted my edit that added Mark Langston's award as AL Rookie Pitcher of the Year. Was there something wrong with my edit? Thanks in advance.Bro rick (talk) 19:01, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Not a notable award. Alvin Davis was the ROY that year.--Yankees10 19:03, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Duly noted. Thanks.Bro rick (talk) 03:19, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Cingrani

Besides not looking like him, Cingrani isn't right-handed (look at the glove). You got the wrong guy in the pic. ~~

I dun goof'd

I was dealing with all the vandalism on Christian Hackenberg and accidentally blocked you instead of the user right below you. I've of course unblocked your account and I apologize for being a moron and accidentally smacking you instead of the right person. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to message me. I'll be happy to address any concerns you have. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:04, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

It's all good.--Yankees10 05:13, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Ken Boyer

I believe Ken was a 7-time, not 11-time All-Star! Still consider him a HOF'er! Brtalley (talk) 14:49, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Jacoby Brissett

Someone changed his birth year to 1993, which is what NFL.com has but NFL.com used to say 1992 and that's what his article has said for years. If he was born in 1993, that means he graduated high school a year early. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 01:27, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Odd. ESPN and PFR are also saying 93. I guess 92 was a mistake that whole time?--Yankees10 01:35, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

This article from Oct. 2011 says he is 18, except he should be 17 if he was born in Dec. 1993. Even though the coach might just be generally saying 18 year old since he's a freshman. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 01:57, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

I just found this, which looks like it may have been written by Brissett, which says he was born in 1992. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 02:01, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Really odd. I wonder why all these websites recently changed to 93 then.--Yankees10 02:11, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Stengel

The article says he was on the 1921 roster, he simply wasn't used. Are there contrary sources?--Wehwalt (talk) 17:30, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Ok, I see now. I'll revert.--Yankees10 17:34, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Lewis Neal

I think Lewis Neal may pass GNG, if someone wants to create an article for him. Wink nudge.[9][10][11] Lizard (talk) 03:13, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Seems notable. I'll check it out tomorrow.--Yankees10 05:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Finding an image

I recently expanded the article J.P. Crawford but there is no image! Do you understand how to find one that is considered fair use...because I certainly don't.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:37, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

@TheGracefulSlick: With all honesty no. I've been editing here for about 10 years and I am still sadly not good with the whole images thing. Maybe ask Merson (talk · contribs) who i've noticed has added a bunch of good pictures to articles.--Yankees10 23:47, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for directing me to him. You have always kept articles on minor leaguers and rookies in good condition so I figured you would know someone.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:56, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

My Apologies

Im very sorry, I did not see your last edit. I thought you changed the derby thing again. My apologies.

David Cone

The information regarding David Cones ex wife and alleged son is false. Brian is not David's son therefore it should not be on his page. Davids ex- wife Lynn has a son named Brian with a man named Jason Castriota. David only has one son named Samuel Cone with Taja Abitbol which should be reflected properly on his Wiki page. Please stop reversing the edits as they are coming directly from the source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.38.79.184 (talk) 00:12, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

The "source?" (I think primary sources--i.e. "I'm giving this information because I know this person"--are scorned upon on Wikipedia, because hearsay, no?) So... all the contemporary newspaper articles interviewing him about fatherhood c. 10 years ago are wrong? Was there a paternity test or something in the interim? Very confusing. 2604:2000:F84A:A700:6C39:D30D:8BB0:55DC (talk) 01:23, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Eric Ebron

If I wanted to say Eric's favorite candy bar was a butterfinger, what would count as a valid source?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webbling (talk • contribs) 06:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC) 

Matt Cain

Stop reverting my changes to Matt Cain’s World Series section. He’s a 3x WS champ. Live with it. LiserKay (talk) 07:36, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Bret Saberhagen

Hello, why was the Saberhagen bit about the Napa fire removed? I have a source but don't know how to put it on yet. StevenRizzo11 (talk) 18:14, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

I never touched Cain StevenRizzo11 (talk) 18:19, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Saberhagen

I think you have this misunderstood. I never edited Cain's section. I wouldn't do that even if I wanted to. StevenRizzo11 (talk) 18:18, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks

Feel free to create some of the others if you want as well. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 17:18, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

I might have a little time today. Can't believe guys who have started like Burgess and Trevon Coley didn't have articles before.--Yankees10 17:22, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Deyshawn Bond has started four games for the Colts at center this year. Also, Justin McCray, who has started three games this year, didn't have an article until a day or two ago. He's interesting because he played in the Arena Football League in 2016. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 17:29, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, as a Packers fan I was wondering who the hell McCray was and noticed he didn't even have an article. Meant to create it at some point but never had the time.--Yankees10 17:50, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

John Ross

Why did you delete my image of John Ross fumbling a football after being hit by Jadeveon Clowney?

Sorry, but those images aren't in the public domain and wouldn't qualify as fair use. See Wikipedia:Uploading images. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 20:34, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Khalil Tate

I created a page on Tate already (just a day before you on the 28th), it's just still awaiting approval :/. It's fine if I need to delete my submission - just please feel free to put some of my page's work onto the page you created. Or just let me update some of the info on his page. Thanks! -Will

@Wwillcoxson1: Feel free to merge any of the content there into the actual article.--Yankees10 01:15, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Derek Barnett

You're right. Say Mike Tomlin attended is extremely random considering it had nothing to do with Tennessee's pro day and it wasn't in a sentence about people and players that were there. Toeknee44 (talk) 21:59, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Page update

Greetings,

I am Carlton Mitchell. I recently changed some information under the name Judah Punch but it was switched back to its original. How can we fix this?

I'd like to change "Free Agent" to "Retired"

And

"American football player" to Hebrew Isrealite football player.

I would also like to select a proper photo.

Please advise

Sincerely,

Carlton Mitchell.

JudahPunch (talk) 04:49, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Yankee10

I'm extremely upset considering I've wrote for MTSU Blue Raiders website since 2011. I've covered Kevin Byard the whole time. He text me last night asking me to upgrade his Wikipedia page. You have no right to delete anything that was fact on Byard. I wrote the stuff myself for years 2012,13,14,15 at MTSU that I redid on here,and I just started the awards. Stop deleting my stuff Yankee man or you will hear from our lawyer. JoshG23 (talk) 19:56, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

It got removed because it just copy-pasted from this page. It should be written out in sentence format. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 20:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Also, Wikipedia:No legal threats. Lizard (talk) 20:11, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

A legal threat. Wow that's a first.--Yankees10 00:11, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

I can just see the court case... Plaintiff: "Your honor, the defendant deleted my contribution to a wikipedia page..." Judge: "Why are you wasting all of our time?" Spanneraol (talk) 00:14, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Happened to me before. Gave me a hearty chuckle. Lizard (talk) 01:03, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

To anyone who was just pinged

When Yankees reverted his talk page back from Nigeria I got 6 notifications saying I was mentioned here. I assume this happened to everyone else who was pinged here since the start of the year, so I just wanted to leave an explanation for anyone who comes here wondering why they were pinged. Lizard (talk) 08:15, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:10,000 rushing yards club

Template:10,000 rushing yards club has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. RoyalsLife 16:20, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Rocco

The info you restored at Rocco Baldelli is misleading / inaccurate, which is why I updated it. He didn't play an official game in 2005. but was under contract with the (D)Rays and spent the season rehabbing, even played in some extended spring training games. Cutting that season out of the infobox entirely makes it look like he was out of baseball as a free agent, which was not the case. Also, he's been a coach of some sort in the Rays organization since his retirement, and the infobox should reflect that. And your edit summary made my point about his position - he played across the outfield. I'll go one further; Rocco made 28 total appearances in CF from 2006 to 2010 but 48 in RF or LF (and one at 3B with Boston, which must've been interesting). Listing him as an outfielder covers all the bases, as it were. Zeng8r (talk) 12:33, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

@Zeng8r: Per WP:Baseball consensus from a while back, seasons that a player did not appear in an MLB game do not appear in the infobox. Whether it be for injury, suspension, minors all season, whatever. It's the reason why Adam Wainwright's 2011 isn't there or A-Rods 2014. Adding 2010 for his coaching is misleading. We only add major league coaching jobs in the infobox and Baldelli has only done that since 2015. With regards to the position, we add the players primary position and center field was clearly his playing nearly 90% of his total games there. No reason for it not to say so in the infobox--Yankees10 17:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Happy Thanksgiving!

	Mmmm...
	I hope you have a good meal and a great Thanksgiving. Thank you for all the time you spend detoxifying vandalized sports articles, as well as for all the article maintenance and writing that you do. Lepricavark (talk) 05:57, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Why was Personal Life section from Fletcher Cox's Wiki removed?

Hi,

I had added personal life section on Fletcher Cox Wikipedia page.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fletcher_Cox

It was removed by you.

May I know the reason for the edit?

Why was season 2017 section removed on Jamison Crowder Wiki page?

I had made an edit on Jamison Crowder Wiki page where I added 2017 season section

May I know why was it removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Billthegreatest (talk • contribs) 06:19, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

The part about the Giants yards and Perine's rushing yards has nothing to do with Crowder.--Yankees10 07:12, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Aaron Boone

Unexpected, to say the least. Are you as puzzled as I am by that hiring? Lizard (talk) 01:48, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

I was puzzled that they fired Girardi in the first place. I still don't get it. I was underwhelmed by every one of these candidates.--Yankees10 02:07, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

I think I heard that they probably would have fired him even if they made it to the WS. That he was too much of a stick in the mud and they wanted someone with more personality. Hell, ask the Patriots, the Spurs, or Alabama if they have a problem with their coaches being a stick in the mud. Lizard (talk) 02:21, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Yes dumbass Hal Steinbrenner said they might have still let him go. Pure insanity.--Yankees10 02:25, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Who bats cleanup, Stanton or Judge? Lizard (talk) 01:14, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Either one is fine by me. This lineup is insane. I can't even believe this happened.--Yankees10 03:41, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Why do you keep removing the All-Star Game MVP award from Career highlights and awards?

You keep removing it from certain players wikipedia pages and it doesn't make sense since the players actually won the award in question — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drdrepepper (talk • contribs) 23:28, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewing

Hello, Yankees10. As one of Wikipedia's most experienced Wikipedia editors, Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 07:55, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Yankees10. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Warn the vandals

You reverted at least 15 vandalism edits by an IP. Why didn't you issue a single warning? Warnings scare a lot of vandals off from further vandalism, and it helps us block the ones who don't stop ASAP. Please read WP:WARNVAND. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:32, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Why did you revert the updated photo of Jimmy Garoppolo?

I updated the photo for Jimmy Garoppolo and you reverted the photo. Why? His old photo was from the Patriots. He is now with the 49ers. The photo I updated was him with the 49ers - why do you want to show a photo of him with the Patriots?

Because the picture of him with the Patriots is a much better picture.--Yankees10 00:46, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

I think his Patriots photo is very slightly better, but I do not believe it is significant enough to replace the photo. He is with the 49ers now and I think a photo of him in a 49ers uniform is what most people would expect to see on his Wiki page. I read in your user page and like you, I am neither a Patriots nor 49ers fan. So, my motivation to update this photo is not biased upon a fan perspective. Therefore, I respectfully disagree with your revert and request that you reconsider and reinstate my edit. --chipermc 01:25, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

You can get others opinions on his talk page if you want.--Yankees10 02:09, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

"tis the season...."

Hello Yankees10: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, ―Buster7 ☎ 19:49, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Articles for Creation Reviewing

Hello, Yankees10. AfC submissions Random submission 2+ months 1,744 pending submissions to update I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged. Would you please consider becoming an Articles for Creation reviewer? Articles for Creation reviewers help new users learn the ropes of creating their first articles, and identify whether topics are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Reviewing drafts doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia inclusion policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After requesting to be added to the project, reviewing is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the reviewing instructions before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 02:49, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Explanation

Hi Yankees10, I see that you questioned why date of birth was deleted from a particular BLP. This is understandable and so I wanted to explain that it was due to a request at OTRS. This is now noted on the article's talk page since your last visit. Happy New Year!  JGHowes  ^talk 19:51, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

OJ Howard

I’ve opened a discussion on Talk:O. J. Howard regarding your recent edits to the article. Billhpike (talk) 04:55, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Retired Players

Hey, I have a question how do you decided when to update players who haven't played in awhile to retired? I thought it was when they haven't played in two years but I have noticed you are doing sooner than that is there a different time period I should go off? An example would be P.J. Walters. Kingryan227 (Decrees • Acts) 18:24, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

It depends on the situation. With Walters for example, he has't played in an MLB game since 2013 and hasn't been with an organization in a year and a half so I figured it was fair to assume he was done.--Yankees10 20:22, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Look here yankees10

Why do you delete edits whenever some one adds content. Wafflex3 (talk) 17:27, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Michael Kelly

Hey, do you think that you could make Michael Kelly (the Orioles pitcher)'s article look proper I am not sure how to do that but the article is all jacked up much appreciated thank you. Kingryan227 (Decrees • Acts) 23:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

I'll take a look at it later.--Yankees10 23:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Julius Dawkins for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julius Dawkins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julius Dawkins until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nthep (talk) 12:53, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Brian Roberts

There is a page move going on. Correcting templates helps the database adjust to show how many mislinks are involved, which takes a few hours to catch up. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:59, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

But the article is no lock to be moved. I'm not sure why you feel it's necessary to jump the gun, but I'm not going to revert again.--Yankees10 17:10, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Corey Clement

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

Your reverting of my changes on the Corey Clement page is seemingly not in good faith. I am local to the area from which he grew up and that is indeed a local nickname that people call him.

@Cfh294: The onus is on the editor adding the information to prove that it belongs in the article, and that there is a consensus for it. A random shmuck polling a few dozen people on Twitter proves nothing. And consensus is clearly against this addition as it's been reverted by three editors now. Lizard (talk) 23:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Navbox ungrouper

Feel free to add any IPs that do this to this list. This guy's been doing this for at least two years now. It's baffling. I'll try to see if a range block is possible. Lizard (talk) 02:29, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Will do.--Yankees10 02:33, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Notable players

What players are considered "notable"? I'm asking because I want to be helpful and add notable players on, but not sure what is considered notable or not. For the recent ones I'd been adding I had been looking at the newly released Top 30 Prospects Lists and had been adding in some of the top 20.

P.S. I understand your reverting of the rankings I added a few days ago. Malmmf (talk) 19:01, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Alex Lange

I ask you do not undo my edit, he admitted he was 17: [[12]].

Thank You. Iamthemostwanted2015 (talk) 01:16, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Iamthemostwanted2015

Nah.--Yankees10 01:17, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

@Iamthemostwanted2015: If we're talking about Alex Lange, it's the wrong Alex Lange. Keep in mind Wikipedia allows usage of self-published sources if it's someone talking about themselves, under limited circumstances: Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Using_the_subject_as_a_self-published_source WhisperToMe (talk) 00:07, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

I hate to say it

I searched him up, you are correct. Sorry about that. Iamthemostwanted2015 (talk) 01:28, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Iamthemostwanted2015

Nomination for deletion of Template:Pro Football Hall of Fame members

Template:Pro Football Hall of Fame members has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Sabbatino (talk) 17:21, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Main characters of films should get redirect notices regardless of whether they have their own articles

Hi! Regarding this edit, it still makes sense for the character to get a redirect notice.

If the main character of a film doesn't get his/her own article, the character's name is supposed to redirect to that of the film. The redirect notice is therefore supposed to direct people interested in the character to the proper place (the article about the film). WhisperToMe (talk) 00:03, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Barrett Barnes

The article Barrett Barnes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable individual. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BASE/N

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:38, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Jordan Reed

Can I ask why you reverted my edits on Jordan Reed? Zillam (talk) 20:23, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Unsourced.--Yankees10 00:19, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Alex Fernandez

He was on the 1997 Marlins even though he didn't pitch. Therefore he's a World Champion like his teammates. --Evil Yugi (talk) 03:09, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Lee May

Realized you were right after I reread the article. Never knew he was a coach, let alone on a World Series team; I assumed it was a mistake that he had been credited with a World Series win many years after his retirement. Thanks. Pugchump (talk) 20:23, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Triple crown stats

Hi. Where does it say in Wikipedia policy that only triple crown stats go in the infobox? Many other players' articles have stats such as stolen bases, hits, etc. Sorry to trouble you. Kind regards Zingarese (talk) 01:59, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball/Player style advice. Generally if a player has over 2,000 hits or 400 SB then it's generally ok.--Yankees10 02:04, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Understood, thanks! Zingarese (talk) 02:10, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Seuly Matias

Matias seems relevant enough to have an article but I’m not sure what sources I can find to make it able to stay an article. There’s not much info on him yet. Any ideas on what types of sources to use or should we just wait until more info comes? Malmmf (talk) 12:06, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Yes like Muboshgu and I told you on your talk page back in February (or March maybe?) there needs to be sources for a player to be on these pages. Matias literally has nothing right now. So yes wait until the sources to re-add--Yankees10 00:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zach Jemiola

Hello, Yankees10. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Zach Jemiola, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:58, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Tyler Conklin

Please stop your reversion of Tyler Conklin to Tyler Conklin (American football). There is only one Tyler Conklin. Also, your comment that the edit history has "Nothing to do with" this Tyler Conklin is incorrect if you actually looked at the edit history. You are just making a double redirect and being disruptive to prove a WP:Point. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 18:59, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Uh yeah the edit history does matter. History for this Conklin should't appear from 2005. The correct procedure would be to go here and request the move. So yeah i'm gonna go ahead and continue to revert.--Yankees10 19:05, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Zach Jemiola for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zach Jemiola is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zach Jemiola until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 20:10, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Jihad Ward

Why did you remove the part where the Cowboys agreed to acquire him because they had scouted him in the 2016 Senior Bowl ?Tecmo (talk) 02:39, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Unsourced and not really notable anyway. The main reason I reverted anyway was because you added the trade a second time.--Yankees10 02:41, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

I'll take "unfortunate names in sports" for 600, Alex. Lizard (talk) 03:30, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Cleveland browns

Hey how are you. I’m new to wiki I was wondering if you could change the Cleveland browns president from Paul DePodesta to vacant. The browns do not have a president in office. Corruption0909 (talk) 06:27, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Dwight Gooden and silver slugger

Sorry for the mistake, it's just that there is no mention of it in the lede or main body of his article. It's odd no one put in at least one sentence in the 1992 section, considering he's a pitcher, its an accomplishment worth mentioning. On the mlb page I only looked at his batting stats and not the awards, so I thought he didn't have enough plate appearances, so again, sorry for the mess up and thanks for undoing it. Persistent Corvid (talk) 23:18, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Unassigned players

Hey, I was wondering if a player hasn't been assigned to a minor league affiliate by now that signed in the offseason should I list them as a free agent or what? Kingryan227 (Decrees • Acts) 19:24, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Disruptive

Stop being the way you are. It's not productive. Bleucheeses (talk) 03:04, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Ok.--Yankees10 03:05, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, but now UW won't stop. Look, it's important to have the leaders of categories recognized. It's a major accomplishment. Bleucheeses (talk) 05:04, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Tyler Jones

I just read through the entire article after I removed the PROD. I now agree, too late, with your PROD. I'll take it to AFD. -- Dolotta (talk) 02:03, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Tyler Jones for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tyler Jones is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Jones until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 06:56, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Reese Havens for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reese Havens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reese Havens until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 06:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Why?

Mitch Walding had played 658 minor league games at third base. And 2 at first base.

Milb.com describes him as a third baseman. They are the official site of minor league baseball. http://www.milb.com/player/index.jsp?player_id=605520#/career/R/hitting/2018/ALL

MLB.com describs him as a third baseman. They are the official site of minor league baseball. http://m.mlb.com/player/605520/mitch-walding?year=2018&stats=career-r-hitting-minors

Another editor already described him as they did -- as a third baseman.

Why did you change his article - which already described him as a third baseman - to call him instead an infielder? Why is your opinion here overriding that of mlb.com, milb.com, and the prior editor? Your edit summary doesnt say why. And whatever .. I think you should not override mlb.com, and should not override another editor without giving a reason that is a good one. --2604:2000:E010:1100:9848:50A0:48B3:889B (talk) 23:27, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Jesus relax...It's not that big of a deal... change it back.--Yankees10 23:34, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Sorry. I figured if you were reverting, you had some strong reason I wasn't seeing. 2604:2000:E010:1100:9848:50A0:48B3:889B (talk) 23:44, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Barkeep49. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Christin Stewart, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 05:23, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chicago White Sox minor league players, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington State (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Vida Blue stats line deletion

Hello and good evening. Why did you delete Vida Blue's stats line? I added hits, runs and earned runs and changed .3 to.1 to represent 1/3 of an inning, and all seemed correct. I don't mind when something is deleted when the statistics are incorrect, but they were correct. You can go to Baseball Reference and Retrosheet to verify the additions, but I feel guilty because my additions caused someone elses work to be entirely deleted. They should be put back, just my opinion. Thank you and have a good evening.2601:581:8500:949C:29AD:44E0:620B:7E12 (talk) 00:31, 12 July 2018 (UTC)