User talk:I am One of Many

; Archives
	Archive 1 (December 2012 – May 2013)
	Archive 2 (June 2013 – August 2013)
	Archive 3 (September 2013 – December 2013)
	Archive 4 (January 2014 – April 2014)
	Archive 5 (May 2014 – July 2014)
	Archive 6 (August 2014 – April 2015)
	Archive 7 (May 2015 – April 2016)
	Archive 8 (May 2016 – ) ;

Hey

Can you help me create the Nathan Damigo page? I’m not really sure how Wikipedia code works, and I’m afraid it will be deleted by the time I create something. Thanks for helping to defend me by the way.

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

MMXX Lunar Calendar

I am One of Many,
Have a great 2020 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.

– 2020 is a leap year – news article.
– Background color is Classic Blue (#0F4C81), Pantone's 2020 Color of the year

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2020}} to user talk pages.

– North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:38, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jeanne Calment

It's a little ironic that you commented at Talk:Jeanne Calment/Archive 2#Edit warring This is a paradigm of a fringe theory. Has anyone actually read this unpublished garbage? Come on,Wikipedia is better than this. And yet when I deleted the fringe stuff from the article as per Talk:Jeanne Calment#Vandalism? (User:Dead Mary stated that Aubrey de Grey is a pseudoscientist and there wasn't any disagreement afterwards), you were quick to put it back. I think perhaps your trigger finger was a little itchy. Regardless, the offending paragraph opens with the exact same wording as the previous paragraph, so if you are going to put it back in, the very least you could do is reword it so that it's not redundant. Thanks. —howcheng {chat} 23:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is my view, but it didn't fit the consensus at the time as I recall it, so I looked to see if there had been a new discussion and I did not see it, so I reverted back to the consensus view. Though I do not agree with the consensus view. --I am One of Many (talk) 00:21, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]