Jump to content

User talk:I am One of Many

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 05:38, 14 June 2020 (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:I am One of Many/Archive 8) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archive
Archives
Archive 1 (December 2012 – May 2013)
Archive 2 (June 2013 – August 2013)
Archive 3 (September 2013 – December 2013)
Archive 4 (January 2014 – April 2014)
Archive 5 (May 2014 – July 2014)
Archive 6 (August 2014 – April 2015)
Archive 7 (May 2015 – April 2016)
Archive 8 (May 2016 – )

Hey

Can you help me create the Nathan Damigo page? I’m not really sure how Wikipedia code works, and I’m afraid it will be deleted by the time I create something. Thanks for helping to defend me by the way.

                                                 Happy holidays

Happy New Year!
I am One of Many,
Have a great 2020 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.


   – 2020 is a leap yearnews article.
   – Background color is Classic Blue (#0F4C81), Pantone's 2020 Color of the year

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2020}} to user talk pages.

North America1000 22:38, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jeanne Calment

It's a little ironic that you commented at Talk:Jeanne Calment/Archive 2#Edit warring This is a paradigm of a fringe theory. Has anyone actually read this unpublished garbage? Come on,Wikipedia is better than this. And yet when I deleted the fringe stuff from the article as per Talk:Jeanne Calment#Vandalism? (User:Dead Mary stated that Aubrey de Grey is a pseudoscientist and there wasn't any disagreement afterwards), you were quick to put it back. I think perhaps your trigger finger was a little itchy. Regardless, the offending paragraph opens with the exact same wording as the previous paragraph, so if you are going to put it back in, the very least you could do is reword it so that it's not redundant. Thanks. howcheng {chat} 23:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is my view, but it didn't fit the consensus at the time as I recall it, so I looked to see if there had been a new discussion and I did not see it, so I reverted back to the consensus view. Though I do not agree with the consensus view. --I am One of Many (talk) 00:21, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious
Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 03:52, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]