Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cool zone

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:38, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cool zone

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

De-PROD'd by an IP. PROD rationale was: Self-described neologism. Only one of the three refs refers to it. Way WP:TOOSOON to see if this will actually enter the common language and not just be a thing a guy said on Twitter one time. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:06, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:06, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:16, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (without prejudice against recreation if it becomes notable) Wikipedia is not a dictionary and this neologism appears to not be commonly used. There's a Vice article and it's sort-of entering usage with some social media posts and one news article from a local news company that mentions it once. Reddit mentions it, as does the Urban dictionary. However, it is not evident that the phrase has become commonly used outside of a few mentions and doomsday prepping. Should it enter common usage, Wikipedia will be here for the article to be recreated. As it stands it's not near meeting the threshold for an article. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:40, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As this term does not seem to be in common usage among the general public just yet, and is not notable enough to be an article on its own. David Greener (talk) 15:32, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:NOTDIC--17jiangz1 (talk) 16:37, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Definitely WP:TOOSOON. Perhaps more of a dictionary term. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 22:39, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.