Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MAKE Motorsports

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:50, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MAKE Motorsports

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod was disputed; article has little content, with no indication whatsoever of how it meets WP:GNG. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:17, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

waiting for improvements prior to saying keep or delete I'm aware of this subject, it is clearly notable and worthy but the article needs vast improvements for inclusion. A worthy subject to create an article about. A couple of sources would help DIZwikwiki (talk) 19:29, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete One of many useless redirects/articles created by a spamtroll days ago. No need to have this. --D-Day (talk) 13:22, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 00:49, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, makes no claim of notability, no sign of mention in secondary sources. Abductive (reasoning) 05:11, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. While this team is indeed notable and the page could easily be improved, this is a case where it would be best to blow it up and start over. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:40, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.